CVE-2026-72427

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-15. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Fix effective prog array index with BPF_F_PREORDER

replace_effective_prog() and purge_effective_progs() located the slot in the effective array by walking the program hlist and counting entries linearly. That count does not match the array layout: compute_effective_ progs() places BPF_F_PREORDER programs at the front (ancestor cgroup first, attach order within a cgroup) and the rest after them (descendant cgroup first). So when a preorder program is present, the linear hlist position no longer equals the program's index in the effective array.

For replace_effective_prog() (bpf_link_update()) this overwrote the wrong slot, corrupting the effective order. For purge_effective_progs(), it could dummy out a slot belonging to a different program and leave the detached program in the array while bpf_prog_put() drops its reference, i.e. a use-after-free.

Fix both by replaying compute_effective_progs()'s placement (including the per-cgroup preorder reversal) in a shared effective_prog_pos() helper. Identify the entry by its struct bpf_prog_list pointer rather than by (prog, link) value, so the lookup resolves to exactly the attachment the syscall selected even when the same bpf_prog is attached to several cgroups in the hierarchy.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(high)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Aug 17, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

bpf: Fix effective prog array index with BPF_F_PREORDER - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f08aaee3152d0dfc578b3f2586932d82062701dd
generic

bpf: Fix effective prog array index with BPF_F_PREORDER - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b584f107ab90222bd825dcb4c5977326ff684109
generic

bpf: Fix effective prog array index with BPF_F_PREORDER - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9697db03e010391c55ae75192cbdf30c5a72c114
generic

bpf: Fix effective prog array index with BPF_F_PREORDER - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/525e408c27ae714e538b8c608c3a974df3ab6c92
generic

bpf: Fix effective prog array index with BPF_F_PREORDER - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/41b4320b84fdafe1ab586b06453d30d50415db59

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-72427(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 28× in last 7d / 28× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-20 11:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-19 22:24 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-19 22:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-19 09:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-18 20:48 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-18 20:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-18 08:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-17 19:14 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-17 19:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-17 06:28 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-08-17 06:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-17 05:57 UTCEG score recompute 7.80
  17. 2026-08-17 05:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-17 05:54 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  19. 2026-08-17 05:29 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-17 05:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-17 05:25 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  22. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-16 02:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-15 06:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 3 more
  1. 2026-08-15 06:23 UTCNVD update
  2. 2026-08-15 06:04 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-15 06:02 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-72427?
CVE-2026-72427 is a high vulnerability published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix effective prog array index with BPFFPREORDER replaceeffectiveprog() and purgeeffectiveprogs() located the slot in the effective array by walking the program hlist and counting entries linearly. That count does not match…
When was CVE-2026-72427 disclosed?
CVE-2026-72427 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 15, 2026, with the most recent update on August 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-72427 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-72427 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 96.6% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-72427?
CVE-2026-72427 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-72427?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-72427, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-72427

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-72427?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.