In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
md/raid5: avoid R5_Overlap races while breaking stripe batches
KCSAN report a race in break_stripe_batch_list() vs. raid5_make_request()
on sh->dev[i].flags (plain word write vs. atomic bit op)..
and .. one possible scenario is:
CPU1 CPU2
break_stripe_batch_list(sh1)
-> handle sh2
-> lock(sh2)
-> sh2->batch_head = NULL
-> unlock(sh2)
-> test_and_clear_bit(R5_Overlap, sh2->dev[i].flags)
-> wake_up_bit(sh2->dev[i].flags)
raid5_make_request()
-> add_all_stripe_bios(sh2)
-> lock(sh2)
-> stripe_bio_overlaps(sh2) returns true
batch_head is NULL, so new bio overlap
exist bio on sh2 -> true
-> set_bit(R5_Overlap, sh2->dev[i].flags)
-> unlock(sh2)
-> wait_on_bit(sh2->dev[i].flags)
-> sh2->dev[i].flags = sh1->dev[i].flags & ~R5_Overlap
No wait_up_bit(), CPU2 could be wait_on_bit() forever...
Fix by :
- Expand the protect zone.
- Use batch_head's device flag's snaphot when no held head_sh->stripe_lock.
- Move sh/head_sh->batch_head = NULL to the end of protected zone , and ,
any concurrent add_all_stripe_bios() grabs sh->stripe_lock now either:
- see batch_head != null, and , is rejected by stripe_bio_overlaps()
under the lock (no R5_Overlap wait ) , or ,
- sees batch_head == NULL, only after dev[i].flags has already been
set and the prior R5_Overlap waiters worken.
KCSAN report:
================================================
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in break_stripe_batch_list / raid5_make_request
write (marked) to 0xffff8e89c8117548 of 8 bytes by task 4042 on cpu 0:
raid5_make_request+0xea0/0x2930
md_handle_request+0x4a2/0xa40
md_submit_bio+0x109/0x1a0
__submit_bio+0x2ec/0x390
submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x457/0x710
submit_bio_noacct+0x2a7/0xc20
submit_bio+0x56/0x250
blkdev_direct_IO+0x54c/0xda0
blkdev_write_iter+0x38f/0x570
aio_write+0x22b/0x490
io_submit_one+0xa51/0xf70
__x64_sys_io_submit+0xf7/0x220
x64_sys_call+0x1907/0x1c60
do_syscall_64+0x130/0x570
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
read to 0xffff8e89c8117548 of 8 bytes by task 4010 on cpu 5:
break_stripe_batch_list+0x249/0x480
handle_stripe_clean_event+0x720/0x9b0
handle_stripe+0x32fb/0x4500
handle_active_stripes.isra.0+0x6e0/0xa50
raid5d+0x7e0/0xba0
md_thread+0x15a/0x2d0
kthread+0x1e3/0x220
ret_from_fork+0x37a/0x410
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
value changed: 0x0000000000000019 -> 0x0000000000000099 --> R5_Overlap
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (8.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it