CVE-2026-72382

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-15. a secondary CVSS source baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ksmbd: reject undersized DACLs before parsing ACEs

parse_dacl() limits the attacker-controlled ACE count by comparing it with the number of minimal ACEs that fit in the DACL size. The DACL size field is 16 bits, but the expression subtracts sizeof(struct smb_acl). Because sizeof() is unsigned, a DACL size smaller than the ACL header underflows to a large size_t.

A malicious client can reach this with:

SMB2_SET_INFO (InfoType=SMB2_O_INFO_SECURITY) -> smb2_set_info_sec() -> set_info_sec() -> parse_sec_desc() -> parse_dacl() -> init_acl_state(..., 0xffff) -> init_acl_state(..., 0xffff) -> kmalloc_objs(..., 0xffff)

Thus a malformed security descriptor can make num_aces pass the guard and drive large temporary ACL state and pointer-array allocations.

Reject DACLs smaller than struct smb_acl before doing the subtraction, so the ACE count check cannot be bypassed by the underflow.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8(high)
EG Risk
44(Track)
EG Risk 44/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity88% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
46%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Aug 17, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

ksmbd: reject undersized DACLs before parsing ACEs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d020e7f27bf65eecd3805404702f716b2b6d9e73
generic

ksmbd: reject undersized DACLs before parsing ACEs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/60908f7ebcd9b6cde74ad5711fab0f49c7970949
generic

ksmbd: reject undersized DACLs before parsing ACEs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/282847c0cf22f2e961155ac8e42f6eeab7e16049
generic

ksmbd: reject undersized DACLs before parsing ACEs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/16fb65ec15fe7c90f50a2115854bfd9a032d4023
generic

ksmbd: reject undersized DACLs before parsing ACEs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/15a9e9b8f7f5d7f380ae54c6f5bcbc0bdcb0f3cd

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-72382(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 31× in last 7d / 31× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-21 01:08 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-21 01:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-20 22:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-20 12:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-19 23:23 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-19 23:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-19 10:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-18 21:37 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-18 21:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-18 08:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-17 19:23 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-08-17 19:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-17 06:29 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-17 06:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-17 05:58 UTCEG score recompute 8.80
  20. 2026-08-17 05:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-17 05:54 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 8.8 · severity → HIGH
  22. 2026-08-17 05:29 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-17 05:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-17 05:25 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  25. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 6 more
  1. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-16 02:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-15 06:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-15 06:23 UTCNVD update
  5. 2026-08-15 06:05 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-15 06:02 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-72382?
CVE-2026-72382 is a high vulnerability published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: reject undersized DACLs before parsing ACEs parse_dacl() limits the attacker-controlled ACE count by comparing it with the number of minimal ACEs that fit in the DACL size. The DACL size field is 16 bits, but the expression…
When was CVE-2026-72382 disclosed?
CVE-2026-72382 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 15, 2026, with the most recent update on August 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-72382 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-72382 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 54.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-72382?
CVE-2026-72382 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-72382?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-72382, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-72382

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-72382?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.