CVE-2026-72367

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-15. a secondary CVSS source baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

iomap: guard io_size EOF trim against concurrent truncate underflow

iomap: fix zero padding data issue in concurrent append writes changed ioend accounting so that io_size tracks only valid data within EOF. This trims io_size when a writeback range extends past end_pos:

ioend->io_size += map_len; if (ioend->io_offset + ioend->io_size > end_pos) ioend->io_size = end_pos - ioend->io_offset;

However, if end_pos ends up below ioend->io_offset, the subtraction becomes negative and is stored in size_t io_size, causing an unsigned wrap to a huge value. This can happen when writeback continues past byte-level EOF up to a block-aligned range, or when a concurrent truncate shrinks the file after end_pos was sampled in iomap_writeback_handle_eof().

A wrapped io_size can mislead append detection and corrupt completion-time size handling, since filesystem end_io paths consume io_size for decisions such as on-disk EOF updates and unwritten/COW completion ranges.

Fix this by clamping io_size to zero when EOF has moved to or before the ioend start offset. This preserves the original intent of trimming io_size to valid in-EOF data while avoiding the underflow.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8(high)
EG Risk
44(Track)
EG Risk 44/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity88% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
45%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Aug 17, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

iomap: guard io_size EOF trim against concurrent truncate underflow - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7f7780abb4c0fdc9a2603aea8e985ff14ee900e0
generic

iomap: guard io_size EOF trim against concurrent truncate underflow - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/55ec50d046c03b3724741957f7b007856e36dbe7
generic

iomap: guard io_size EOF trim against concurrent truncate underflow - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1f38f65bf965fce9aa159d45c5347538f56c5973

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-72367(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 29× in last 7d / 29× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-20 19:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-20 07:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-19 19:08 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-19 19:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-19 07:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-18 19:02 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-18 19:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-18 07:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-17 18:59 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-17 18:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-17 06:29 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-17 06:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-17 05:58 UTCEG score recompute 8.80
  18. 2026-08-17 05:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-17 05:54 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 8.8 · severity → HIGH
  20. 2026-08-17 05:30 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-17 05:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-17 05:25 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  23. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-16 02:15 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 4 more
  1. 2026-08-15 06:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-15 06:23 UTCNVD update
  3. 2026-08-15 06:06 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-15 06:02 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-72367?
CVE-2026-72367 is a high vulnerability published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iomap: guard io_size EOF trim against concurrent truncate underflow iomap: fix zero padding data issue in concurrent append writes changed ioend accounting so that io_size tracks only valid data within EOF. This trims io_size when…
When was CVE-2026-72367 disclosed?
CVE-2026-72367 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 15, 2026, with the most recent update on August 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-72367 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-72367 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 54.8% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-72367?
CVE-2026-72367 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-72367?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-72367, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-72367

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-72367?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.