CVE-2026-72247

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-15. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

netfilter: nf_conncount: fix zone comparison in tuple dedup

The "already exists" dedup logic in __nf_conncount_add() decides whether a connection has already been counted and can be skipped instead of incrementing the connlimit count. It compares the conntrack zone of a list entry with the zone of the connection being added using nf_ct_zone_id() and nf_ct_zone_equal(), passing conn->zone.dir or zone->dir as the direction argument.

Those helpers take enum ip_conntrack_dir values: IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL is 0 and IP_CT_DIR_REPLY is 1. However, zone->dir is a u8 bitmask: NF_CT_ZONE_DIR_ORIG is 1, NF_CT_ZONE_DIR_REPL is 2 and NF_CT_DEFAULT_ZONE_DIR is 3. Passing that bitmask as the enum direction shifts the meaning of every non-zero value. An ORIG-only zone passes 1 and is tested as REPLY, while REPL-only and default zones pass 2 or 3 and test bits beyond the valid direction range. In those cases nf_ct_zone_id() can fall back to NF_CT_DEFAULT_ZONE_ID instead of using the real zone id, so different zones can be treated as equal and dedup collapses to tuple equality alone.

nf_conncount stores and compares the original-direction tuple for a connection. If an skb already has an attached conntrack entry, get_ct_or_tuple_from_skb() explicitly copies ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple, regardless of the packet's ctinfo. Therefore the zone comparison in the tuple dedup path must use IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL as well; the zone direction bitmask describes where a zone id applies, not which direction this conncount tuple represents.

Fix the two dedup comparisons by passing IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL directly. Do not special-case NF_CT_DEFAULT_ZONE_DIR and do not compare raw zone ids: using the existing helpers with IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL preserves the direction-aware NF_CT_DEFAULT_ZONE_ID fallback. A default bidirectional zone contains the ORIG bit, so it naturally returns the real zone id; reply-only zones continue to fall back for original-direction tuple comparisons.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5(high)
EG Risk
39(Track)
EG Risk 39/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity75% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
50%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Aug 17, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

netfilter: nf_conncount: fix zone comparison in tuple dedup - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f62c41b4910e65da396ec9a8c40c1fe7fe82e449
generic

netfilter: nf_conncount: fix zone comparison in tuple dedup - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/82fc35e0da9a91db9a034f8311f18f77a599ae3f
generic

netfilter: nf_conncount: fix zone comparison in tuple dedup - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7bdc3c0985ecf17b957811fedcc684acdf698acc
generic

netfilter: nf_conncount: fix zone comparison in tuple dedup - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/78b5d6dbc860776161f9e9206b06ff8a01f531ab
generic

netfilter: nf_conncount: fix zone comparison in tuple dedup - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ff07ac5405bea4d4ead3559fc123f987576424a
generic

netfilter: nf_conncount: fix zone comparison in tuple dedup - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4f30a89c0ed2418719a1144881c2635b940b543d
generic

netfilter: nf_conncount: fix zone comparison in tuple dedup - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3cd9a5792cbea81139c24320986dd0db69e9b5d0
generic

netfilter: nf_conncount: fix zone comparison in tuple dedup - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/35a56e2a46b90e6bd4ca816b80e9cb8d20dfc3ce

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-72247(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 29× in last 7d / 29× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-20 12:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-20 00:56 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-20 00:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-19 13:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-19 02:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-18 15:38 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-18 15:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-18 04:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-17 17:28 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-17 17:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-17 06:20 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-17 06:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-17 05:59 UTCEG score recompute 7.50
  18. 2026-08-17 05:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-17 05:54 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.5 · severity → HIGH
  20. 2026-08-17 05:31 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-17 05:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-17 05:24 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  23. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-16 02:15 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 4 more
  1. 2026-08-15 06:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-15 06:23 UTCNVD update
  3. 2026-08-15 06:09 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-15 06:02 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-72247?
CVE-2026-72247 is a high vulnerability published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_conncount: fix zone comparison in tuple dedup The "already exists" dedup logic in nfconncountadd() decides whether a connection has already been counted and can be skipped instead of incrementing the connlimit count.…
When was CVE-2026-72247 disclosed?
CVE-2026-72247 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 15, 2026, with the most recent update on August 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-72247 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-72247 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 50.1% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-72247?
CVE-2026-72247 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-72247?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-72247, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-72247

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-72247?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.