CVE-2026-72215

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scored
—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

MIPS: DEC: Ensure 32-bit stack location for o32 prom_printf()

In 64-bit configurations calling any firmware entry points from a kernel thread other than the initial one will result in a situation where the stack has been placed in the XKPHYS 64-bit memory segment.

Consequently the stack pointer is no longer a 32-bit value and when the 32-bit firmware code called uses 32-bit ALU operations to manipulate the stack pointer, the calculated result is incorrect (in fact in the 64-bit MIPS ISA almost all 32-bit ALU operations will produce an unpredictable result when executed on 64-bit data) and control goes astray.

This may happen when no final console driver has been enabled in the configuration and consequently the initial console continues being used late into bootstrap, or with an upcoming change that will switch the zs driver to use a platform device, which in turn will make the console handover happen only after other kernel threads have already been started, and the kernel will hang at:

pid_max: default: 32768 minimum: 301

or somewhat later, but always before:

cblist_init_generic: Setting adjustable number of callback queues.

has been printed.

It seems that only the prom_printf() entry point is affected. Of all the other entry points wired only rex_slot_address() and rex_gettcinfo() are called from a kernel thread other than the initial one, specifically kernel_init(), and they are leaf functions that do no business with the stack, having worked with no issue ever since 64-bit support was added for the platform back in 2002.

To address this issue then, arrange for the stack to be switched in the o32 wrapper as required for prom_printf() only, by supplying call_o32() with a pointer to a chunk of initdata space, which is placed in the CKSEG0 32-bit compatibility segment, observing that prom_printf() is only called from console output handler and therefore with the console lock held, implying no need for this code to be reentrant.

Other firmware entry points may be called with interrupts enabled and no lock held, and may therefore require that call_o32() be reentrant. They trigger no issue at this point and "if it ain't broke, don't fix it," so just leave them alone.

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
11th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

EG Severity
Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the BOD 26-04 block below.

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-72215(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(8)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (55 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.180-1: fixed in 6.1.180-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (31 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.100-1: fixed in 6.12.100-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (160 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.5-1: fixed in 7.1.5-1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(8)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 37× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 4 repeat rows among the latest 86 are merged into the row they repeat.

  1. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  2. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  3. 2026-10-18 03:16 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  5. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  6. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  7. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  8. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  9. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  10. 2026-10-12 15:42 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 19:27 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 16:43 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 14:03 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  15. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  16. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  17. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  18. 2026-10-06 18:28 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-06 18:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpm2-25vc-f276
  20. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  21. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  22. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  23. 2026-10-03 20:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpm2-25vc-f276
  24. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  25. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
Show 57 more
  1. 2026-09-30 22:38 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-30 22:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpm2-25vc-f276
  3. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  4. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  5. 2026-09-28 00:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpm2-25vc-f276
  6. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  7. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  8. 2026-09-25 02:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpm2-25vc-f276
  9. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  10. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  11. 2026-09-21 19:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpm2-25vc-f276
  12. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  13. 2026-09-18 19:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpm2-25vc-f276
  14. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  15. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  16. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  17. 2026-09-15 21:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpm2-25vc-f276
  18. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  19. 2026-09-12 23:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpm2-25vc-f276
  20. 2026-09-12 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  21. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  22. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  23. 2026-09-10 01:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpm2-25vc-f276
  24. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  25. 2026-09-07 01:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpm2-25vc-f276
  26. 2026-09-06 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  27. 2026-09-04 03:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpm2-25vc-f276
  28. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  29. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  30. 2026-09-01 04:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpm2-25vc-f276
  31. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  32. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  33. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  34. 2026-08-29 06:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpm2-25vc-f276
  35. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  36. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  37. 2026-08-26 00:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpm2-25vc-f276
  38. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  39. 2026-08-23 02:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpm2-25vc-f276
  40. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  41. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  42. 2026-08-20 22:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  43. 2026-08-20 04:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpm2-25vc-f276
  44. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  45. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  46. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  47. 2026-08-17 06:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpm2-25vc-f276
  48. 2026-08-17 06:18 UTCNVD update
  49. 2026-08-17 05:32 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-08-17 05:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpm2-25vc-f276
  51. 2026-08-17 05:24 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  52. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  53. 2026-08-16 02:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  54. 2026-08-15 06:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpm2-25vc-f276
  55. 2026-08-15 06:23 UTCNVD update
  56. 2026-08-15 06:10 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-15 06:02 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-72215?
CVE-2026-72215 is a vulnerability whose severity is not yet rated; its CVE record was published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: MIPS: DEC: Ensure 32-bit stack location for o32 prom_printf() In 64-bit configurations calling any firmware entry points from a kernel thread other than the initial one will result in a situation where the stack has been placed in…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-72215 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-72215 was published on August 15, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-72215 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-72215 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (11th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-72215?
A fix for CVE-2026-72215 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-72215 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-72215

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-72215?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.