In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ntfs: fix mrec_lock ABBA deadlock in rename
ntfs_file_fsync(), ntfs_dir_fsync() and __ntfs_write_inode() lock an
inode's mrec_lock before taking the mrec_lock of its parent directory.
ntfs_rename() takes old_ni->mrec_lock and old_dir_ni->mrec_lock
before taking new_ni->mrec_lock for an existing target, or
new_dir_ni->mrec_lock for a cross-directory rename.
This can deadlock when ntfs_file_fsync() or __ntfs_write_inode() holds
the target inode, or when ntfs_dir_fsync() holds a child target
directory, while rename() holds the parent directory and waits for the
target.
Fix this by locking the existing target inode before taking any parent
directory mrec_lock. For cross-directory renames where the target parent
is a descendant of the source parent, lock the target parent before the
source parent so the directory order matches the child-to-parent order used
by ntfs_file_fsync(), ntfs_dir_fsync(), and __ntfs_write_inode().
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
- EG Severity
- Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the BOD 26-04 block below.
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it