CVE-2026-72175

HIGHPre-NVD 7.17.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-15. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fs/proc/task_mmu: fix make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() prot-update race

Patch series "userfaultfd/pagemap: pre-existing fixes".

These are pre-existing bug fixes that were carried at the front of the userfaultfd RWP working-set-tracking series up to v5 [1]. Per review feedback that fixes should not sit in the middle of a feature series, they are split out and sent on their own; the RWP series is reposted rebased on top of this.

All six were flagged by the Sashiko AI review of the RWP series and carry independent of RWP, apply to mm-new directly, and carry Cc: stable@.

1: fs/proc/task_mmu: a missing huge_ptep_modify_prot_start() in make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() can lose hardware Dirty/Accessed updates when PAGEMAP_SCAN write-protects a hugetlb PTE.

2: fs/proc/task_mmu: pagemap_scan_hugetlb_entry() compares the range against HPAGE_SIZE rather than the hstate page size, so it never write-protects gigantic hugetlb pages.

3: fs/proc/task_mmu: PAGEMAP_SCAN with PM_SCAN_WP_MATCHING over an unpopulated hugetlb range self-deadlocks -- pagemap_scan_pte_hole() calls uffd_wp_range() while walk_hugetlb_range() holds the hugetlb vma lock for read, and hugetlb_change_protection() then takes it for write. Install the marker inline instead.

4: mm/huge_memory: change_non_present_huge_pmd() drops pmd_swp_uffd_wp on a device-private PMD permission downgrade, silently losing the uffd-wp marker.

5: userfaultfd: must_wait() applies pte_write() to a locklessly read PTE without checking pte_present(), so swap/migration entries decode random offset bits and a thread can stay parked on a stale fault.

6: userfaultfd: __VMA_UFFD_FLAGS feeds VMA_UFFD_MINOR_BIT (41) to mk_vma_flags() unconditionally, an out-of-bounds write into the single-word vma_flags_t on 32-bit. Build the mask from config-gated per-mode masks so an unavailable bit is never materialised.

This patch (of 6):

make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() arms the UFFD_WP bit on a present HugeTLB PTE by calling huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit() with a ptent snapshot that was fetched without the corresponding huge_ptep_modify_prot_start(). The start helper is what atomically clears the entry so the kernel-owned snapshot stays consistent until the commit; without it, the hardware may set Dirty or Accessed in the live PTE between the original read and the commit, and huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit() (whose generic implementation just calls set_huge_pte_at()) then writes the stale snapshot back over the live hardware bits, losing the update.

The non-hugetlb sibling make_uffd_wp_pte() does this correctly via ptep_modify_prot_start() / ptep_modify_prot_commit(). Mirror that pattern for the present-PTE branch. The migration case stays as-is -- migration entries are non-present, so there's no hardware update to race against.

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
32
EG Risk 32/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity71% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
6th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.1 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

October 16, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Aug 17, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

fs/proc/task_mmu: fix make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() prot-update race - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8e39ed92d7c5c6bfc08dc45153916f49a4e98bab
Web page

fs/proc/task_mmu: fix make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() prot-update race - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6b7f774b8882445d9174681747d37c42548686a4
Web page

fs/proc/task_mmu: fix make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() prot-update race - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/50a25249a6355db74c2c1b6be541b4caab9f3655
Web page

fs/proc/task_mmu: fix make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() prot-update race - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/04718f7c9290f95385f0dd328758753dc1c36dec

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-72175(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(9)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.101-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.101-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (32 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.101-1: fixed in 6.12.101-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (160 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.5-1: fixed in 7.1.5-1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(9)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 77× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 212 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 112 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  2. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  3. 2026-10-18 03:16 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-16 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-16 19:33 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-16 19:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  7. 2026-10-16 18:55 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-16 18:55 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-16 18:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  10. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  11. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  12. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  13. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  14. 2026-10-13 08:19 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-13 08:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  16. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  17. 2026-10-12 15:42 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-11 19:27 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-11 16:43 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-11 14:03 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  22. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  23. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  24. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  25. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-06 22:45 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-06 22:45 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-06 22:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  4. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  5. 2026-10-06 09:17 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-06 09:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  7. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  8. 2026-10-05 12:42 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-05 12:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  10. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  11. 2026-10-04 22:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  12. 2026-10-04 07:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  13. 2026-10-03 19:37 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-03 19:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  15. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  16. 2026-10-02 18:56 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-02 18:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  18. 2026-10-02 07:14 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-02 07:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  20. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  21. 2026-10-01 08:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  22. 2026-09-30 21:14 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-30 21:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  24. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  25. 2026-09-29 00:35 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-29 00:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  27. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  28. 2026-09-28 10:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  29. 2026-09-27 23:10 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-09-27 23:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  31. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  32. 2026-09-27 08:47 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-09-27 08:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  34. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  35. 2026-09-25 02:49 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-25 02:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  37. 2026-09-24 08:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  38. 2026-09-23 20:41 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-23 20:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  40. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  41. 2026-09-23 09:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  42. 2026-09-22 21:27 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-09-22 21:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  44. 2026-09-22 09:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  45. 2026-09-21 21:42 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-21 21:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  47. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  48. 2026-09-21 10:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  49. 2026-09-20 22:30 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-09-20 22:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  51. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  52. 2026-09-20 10:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  53. 2026-09-19 23:02 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-09-19 23:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  55. 2026-09-19 11:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  56. 2026-09-18 23:38 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-09-18 23:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  58. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  59. 2026-09-18 11:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  60. 2026-09-18 00:22 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-09-18 00:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  62. 2026-09-17 11:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  63. 2026-09-17 00:14 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-09-17 00:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  65. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  66. 2026-09-16 12:37 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-09-16 12:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  68. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  69. 2026-09-16 01:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  70. 2026-09-15 13:23 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-09-15 13:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  72. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  73. 2026-09-15 01:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  74. 2026-09-14 14:11 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-09-14 14:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw79-wr8v-532g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-72175?
CVE-2026-72175 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/proc/taskmmu: fix makeuffdwphuge_pte() prot-update race Patch series "userfaultfd/pagemap: pre-existing fixes". These are pre-existing bug fixes that were carried at the front of the userfaultfd RWP working-set-tracking series…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-72175 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-72175 was published on August 15, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 16, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-72175 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-72175 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (6th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-72175?
CVE-2026-72175 has a CVSS base score of 7.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-72175?
A fix for CVE-2026-72175 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-72175 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-72175

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-72175?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.