CVE-2026-72124

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-15. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

can: isotp: serialize TX state transitions under so->rx_lock

The TX state machine (so->tx.state) is driven from three contexts: sendmsg() claiming and progressing a transfer, the RX path consuming Flow Control/echo frames, and two hrtimers timing out a stalled transfer. Mixing a lock-free cmpxchg() claim in sendmsg() with hrtimer_cancel() calls made under so->rx_lock elsewhere left windows where a frame or timer callback could act on a state that had already moved on, corrupting an unrelated transfer.

so->rx_lock now covers the full lifecycle of a TX claim: sendmsg() takes it to check so->tx.state is ISOTP_IDLE, switch it to ISOTP_SENDING, bump so->tx_gen and drain the previous transfer's timers - all as one critical section. isotp_rcv_fc()/isotp_rcv_cf() already run under this lock via isotp_rcv(), and isotp_rcv_echo() now takes it itself, so none of them can ever observe a transfer mid-claim. This also means a transfer can no longer be handed to sendmsg()'s cleanup paths (signal or send error) while another thread is concurrently claiming or finishing it, so those paths can cancel timers and reset the state unconditionally.

isotp_release() claims the socket the same way, so a racing sendmsg() sees a consistent ISOTP_SHUTDOWN and skips arming its timer or sending.

Only the hrtimer callbacks stay outside so->rx_lock, since they run under so->rx_lock's cancellation elsewhere and taking it themselves would deadlock. so->tx_gen lets them recognize whether the transfer they timed out is still the one currently active, so they don't report an error against a transfer that has since completed or been superseded.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.4% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
27th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

October 16, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Aug 17, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

can: isotp: serialize TX state transitions under so->rx_lock - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cf070fe33bfbd1a4c21236078fadb35dd223a157
Web page

can: isotp: serialize TX state transitions under so->rx_lock - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a7d90e7b5e75d7406c889fe36e9a61ee364a00cb
Web page

can: isotp: serialize TX state transitions under so->rx_lock - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4f1fdf1a1c317bcac0c6b6c8e12642c9983de1ca
Web page

can: isotp: serialize TX state transitions under so->rx_lock - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/37beb16e08cae94cc05840c7274225e3b0b38ae7
Web page

can: isotp: serialize TX state transitions under so->rx_lock - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0b05eca9589f609e2491b528dccf683168a4cda8

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-72124(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(15)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (56 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.187-1: fixed in 6.1.187-1
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.101-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.101-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (32 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.101-1: fixed in 6.12.101-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (160 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.5-1: fixed in 7.1.5-1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(15)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 98× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 233 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 133 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  2. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  3. 2026-10-18 03:16 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  5. 2026-10-16 19:38 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-16 19:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  7. 2026-10-16 18:55 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-16 18:55 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-16 18:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  10. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  11. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  12. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  13. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  14. 2026-10-13 08:21 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-13 08:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  16. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  17. 2026-10-12 15:42 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-11 19:27 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-11 16:43 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-11 14:03 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  22. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  23. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  24. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  25. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-06 22:48 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-06 22:48 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-06 22:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  4. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  5. 2026-10-06 09:17 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-06 09:17 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-06 09:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  8. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  9. 2026-10-05 12:44 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-05 12:44 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-05 12:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  12. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  13. 2026-10-04 22:06 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-04 22:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  15. 2026-10-04 08:47 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-04 08:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  17. 2026-10-03 19:37 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-03 19:37 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-03 19:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  20. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  21. 2026-10-02 21:48 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-02 21:48 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-02 21:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  24. 2026-10-02 07:15 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-02 07:15 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-02 07:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  27. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  28. 2026-10-01 10:21 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-01 10:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  30. 2026-09-30 21:20 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-30 21:20 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-09-30 21:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  33. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  34. 2026-09-29 02:41 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-09-29 02:41 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-09-29 02:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  37. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  38. 2026-09-28 12:12 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-09-28 12:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  40. 2026-09-27 23:11 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-27 23:11 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-09-27 23:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  43. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  44. 2026-09-27 08:49 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-27 08:49 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-27 08:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  47. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  48. 2026-09-25 02:51 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-09-25 02:51 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-09-25 02:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  51. 2026-09-24 09:44 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-09-24 09:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  53. 2026-09-23 20:42 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-09-23 20:42 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-09-23 20:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  56. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  57. 2026-09-23 04:11 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-09-23 04:11 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-09-23 04:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  60. 2026-09-22 15:10 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-09-22 15:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  62. 2026-09-22 02:09 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-09-22 02:09 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-09-22 02:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  65. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  66. 2026-09-21 13:05 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-09-21 13:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  68. 2026-09-21 00:04 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-09-21 00:04 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-09-21 00:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  71. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  72. 2026-09-20 09:56 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-09-20 09:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h95p-28wv-6wpp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  74. 2026-09-19 17:20 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-09-19 17:20 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-72124?
CVE-2026-72124 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: isotp: serialize TX state transitions under so->rx_lock The TX state machine (so->tx.state) is driven from three contexts: sendmsg() claiming and progressing a transfer, the RX path consuming Flow Control/echo frames, and two…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-72124 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-72124 was published on August 15, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 16, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-72124 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-72124 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (27th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-72124?
CVE-2026-72124 has a CVSS base score of 8.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-72124?
A fix for CVE-2026-72124 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-72124 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-72124

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-72124?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.