CVE-2026-70495

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-17. The CNA's CVSS baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: the CNA's CVSS, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

A flaw was found in search-v2-operator. This component's search-serviceaccount has overly broad permissions, allowing it to impersonate users and groups across the entire cluster. If an attacker gains access to any of the pods running under this service account, they could exploit this to achieve system:masters access, granting them full control over the cluster.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
The EG Score, 8.8 of 10.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
4th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 17, 2026

Last Modified

September 5, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 17, 2026
Patch available. Sources: redhat.
Red Hat

2511031 – (CVE-2026-70495) CVE-2026-70495 search-v2-operator: search-v2-operator: cluster-wide impersonate on users/groups shared across 4 pods grants hub system:masters

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2511031
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

CVE-2026-70495 - Red Hat Customer Portal

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a

https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-70495

Patch Availability(6)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatrhacm2/acm-search-v2-rhel9:17876888272026-08-26redhat
redhatrhacm2/acm-search-v2-rhel9:17876820332026-08-26redhat
redhatrhacm2/acm-search-v2-rhel9:17876816862026-08-26redhat
redhatrhacm2/acm-search-v2-rhel9:17876816742026-08-26redhat
redhatrhacm2/acm-search-v2-rhel9:17876816512026-08-26redhat
redhatrhacm2/acm-search-v2-rhel9:17876821122026-08-26redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 19× in last 7d / 126× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 269 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 169 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 15:43 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-11 19:29 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 16:44 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 14:04 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  7. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  8. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  9. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  10. 2026-10-07 11:26 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-07 11:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  12. 2026-10-06 21:44 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-06 21:44 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-06 21:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  15. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  16. 2026-10-06 09:02 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-06 09:02 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-06 09:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  19. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  20. 2026-10-05 11:52 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-05 11:52 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-05 11:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  23. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  24. 2026-10-04 21:49 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-04 21:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-04 05:46 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-04 05:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  3. 2026-10-03 17:47 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-03 17:47 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-03 17:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  6. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  7. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  8. 2026-10-02 15:45 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-02 15:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  10. 2026-10-02 01:34 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-02 01:34 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-02 01:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  13. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  14. 2026-10-01 09:57 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-01 09:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  16. 2026-09-30 21:58 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-30 21:58 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-30 21:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  19. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  20. 2026-09-30 09:59 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-30 09:59 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-09-30 09:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  23. 2026-09-28 21:59 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-28 21:59 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-09-28 21:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  26. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  27. 2026-09-28 09:38 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-09-28 09:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  29. 2026-09-27 21:39 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-09-27 21:39 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-09-27 21:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  32. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  33. 2026-09-27 08:05 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-27 08:05 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-09-27 08:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  36. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  37. 2026-09-25 02:01 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-25 02:01 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-09-25 02:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  40. 2026-09-24 08:38 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-09-24 08:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  42. 2026-09-23 20:39 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-09-23 20:39 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-09-23 20:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  45. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  46. 2026-09-23 08:39 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-09-23 08:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  48. 2026-09-22 20:40 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-09-22 20:40 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-09-22 20:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  51. 2026-09-22 06:38 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-09-22 06:38 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-09-22 06:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  54. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  55. 2026-09-21 18:38 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-09-21 18:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  57. 2026-09-21 06:10 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-09-21 06:10 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-09-21 06:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  60. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  61. 2026-09-20 17:04 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-09-20 17:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  63. 2026-09-20 04:46 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-09-20 04:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  65. 2026-09-19 16:46 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-09-19 16:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  67. 2026-09-19 04:47 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-09-19 04:47 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-09-19 04:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  70. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  71. 2026-09-18 16:47 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-09-18 16:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  73. 2026-09-18 03:58 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-09-18 03:58 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-09-18 03:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q7g5-25j5-rf23 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-70495?
CVE-2026-70495 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 17, 2026. A flaw was found in search-v2-operator. This component's search-serviceaccount has overly broad permissions, allowing it to impersonate users and groups across the entire cluster. If an attacker gains access to any of the pods running under this service account, they could exploit this to achieve…
When was CVE-2026-70495 made public?
CVE-2026-70495 was made public on August 17, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Red Hat, Inc., gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on August 17, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 5, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-70495 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-70495 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (4th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-70495?
CVE-2026-70495 has a CVSS base score of 8.8 (the CNA's own assessment, by redhat; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-70495?
A fix for CVE-2026-70495 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-70495 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-70495

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-70495?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.