Gitea validates a repository migration hostname against its network allow and block lists before invoking Git, but the Git subprocess independently resolves the hostname when connecting. An attacker who can start a migration and control the destination's DNS can change the address between validation and connection to reach a blocked internal address. The affected path is the Git clone operation; validation in the migration HTTP client's dialer does not protect the independently connecting Git subprocess.
CVE-2026-70357
This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (15th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 49EG Risk 49/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity75% × 45%The EG Score, 7.5 of 10.Exploitation0% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 15th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
Published
October 6, 2026
Last Modified
October 7, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Oct 7, 2026v28.0.0
Patch available: go-gitea/gitea v28.0.0
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v28.0.0fix(git)!: use internal proxy for all git operations
Fix merged in go-gitea/gitea PR #39426 on 2026-09-29 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/39426Migration SSRF via DNS Rebinding — TOCTOU Between DNS Validation and Git Connection · Advisory · go-gitea/gitea · GitHub
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-p3pc-g8m5-hrrrWeakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 13× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-10-10 21:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
- 2026-10-09 21:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
- 2026-10-08 21:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
- 2026-10-08 09:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-07 20:22 UTCEG score recompute▲ 7.50
- 2026-10-07 20:21 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.5 · severity → HIGH
- 2026-10-06 20:31 UTCNVD update
- 2026-10-06 19:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 19:31 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-70357?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-70357 published?
Is CVE-2026-70357 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-70357?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-70357?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-70357
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-70357?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.