CVE-2026-69248

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.96.9—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This medium-severity CVE scores 6.9 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (21st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekElevated
6.9EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 6.9Exploit: Elevated riskExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

cryptography is a package designed to expose cryptographic primitives and recipes to Python developers. In versions 45.0.0 through 48.0.0, if an intermediate constrained CA permits the DNS name foo.example.com, and the leaf certificate has a wildcard in its DNS SAN of *.example.com, python-cryptography's verifier accepts which allows escaping outside of the permitted names. The core issue is in DNSConstraint::matches, where a wildcard pattern was treated as matching a more-specific permitted constraint even though *.example.com can expand to sibling names such as bar.example.com outside foo.example.com. This allows acceptance of an invalid certificate chain. This issue is fixed in 49.0.0.

CVSS v3
6.9
EG Score
6.9MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
47
EG Risk 47/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity69% × 45%
Exploitation40% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
21st
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

August 3, 2026

Last Modified

September 10, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Aug 3, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github_pr, github_commit, github.
github_commit

commit 4d035a422596 (pyca/cryptography)

Fix landed in pyca/cryptography commit 4d035a422596 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/commit/4d035a4225965edeffd312079a510ef25fcfdcb2
github_pr

x509: distinguish NC kinds when evaluating wildcard DNS SANs

Fix merged in pyca/cryptography PR #14888 on 2026-05-22 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/pull/14888
github Patch Available🟡 PoC Available

python-cryptography verifier accepts wildcard DNS names allowing escape from permittedSubtrees · Advisory · pyca/cryptography · GitHub

https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/security/advisories/GHSA-m2h6-j472-rp4c

Patch Availability(8)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntupython3-cryptography (46.0.5-1ubuntu2.2) @ resolute2026-10-04ubuntu
redhatrhaii/vllm-cuda-rhel9:17900901312026-09-23redhat
redhatrhaii/vllm-rocm-rhel9:17901096202026-09-23redhat
redhatrhaii/vllm-cpu-rhel9:17900757932026-09-23redhat
redhatrhaii/vllm-spyre-rhel9:17900761412026-09-23redhat
redhatpython3.14-cryptography-0:45.0.4-4.el10_2.52026-09-08redhat
redhatpython3.14-cryptography-0:45.0.4-4.el9_8.62026-09-08redhat
redhatpython-cryptography-main-50.0.0-1.hum12026-08-17redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-cryptography3.3.2-1 ... 49.0.0-2 (34 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-cryptography38.0.4-3 ... 49.0.0-2 (28 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-cryptography43.0.0-3 ... 49.0.0-2 (17 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-cryptography43.0.0-3 ... 49.0.0-1~exp1 (14 versions)
  • every version up to 49.0.0-1: fixed in 49.0.0-1
—
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
cryptography0.1 ... 48.0.1 (156 versions)
  • 45.0.0 up to 49.0.0: fixed in 49.0.0
  • every version up to 49.0.0: fixed in 49.0.0
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(1)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 61× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 120 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-10-04 06:17 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-04 06:17 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-10-02 10:17 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-02 10:17 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-10-01 02:31 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-01 02:31 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-29 06:31 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-29 06:31 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-27 18:13 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-09-27 18:13 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-25 10:20 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-25 10:20 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-24 08:12 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-24 08:12 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-23 05:47 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-23 05:47 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-22 03:41 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-22 03:41 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-19 23:26 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-19 23:26 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-18 18:25 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-18 18:25 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-09-17 16:18 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-09-17 16:18 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-16 11:17 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-16 11:17 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-15 07:00 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-15 07:00 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-14 04:40 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-14 04:40 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-09-13 02:33 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-13 02:33 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-09-12 00:25 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-12 00:25 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-09-10 20:38 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-09-10 20:38 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-09-10 08:49 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-09-09 06:42 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-09-09 06:42 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-09-07 18:46 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-09-06 06:28 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-09-05 04:17 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-09-02 14:34 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-09-02 13:41 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-02 07:47 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-08-31 00:03 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-08-29 21:56 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-08-27 15:00 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-08-26 12:53 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-08-25 10:46 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-23 06:13 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-08-22 04:06 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-08-21 01:59 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-20 22:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-08-19 23:52 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-08-18 21:44 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-08-17 19:35 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-08-16 15:48 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-08-16 02:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-08-15 13:42 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-08-14 11:35 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-69248?
CVE-2026-69248 is a medium vulnerability published on August 3, 2026. cryptography is a package designed to expose cryptographic primitives and recipes to Python developers. In versions 45.0.0 through 48.0.0, if an intermediate constrained CA permits the DNS name foo.example.com, and the leaf certificate has a wildcard in its DNS SAN of .example.com,…
When was CVE-2026-69248 disclosed?
CVE-2026-69248 was first published on August 3, 2026, with the most recent update on September 10, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-69248 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-69248 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (21st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-69248?
CVE-2026-69248 has a CVSS base score of 6.9 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-69248?
A fix for CVE-2026-69248 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-69248 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-69248

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-69248?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.