LiquidJS is a Shopify / GitHub Pages compatible template engine in pure JavaScript. Prior to 10.27.2, the join filter in src/filters/array.ts computes complexity from array.length and separator length instead of the total string length produced by array.join(sep). The concat filter can cheaply double arrays of references, after which join materializes the referenced content while charging only for element count, allowing a template to exceed a configured memoryLimit by a large factor. The sibling array_to_sentence_string filter in src/filters/string.ts has the same accounting defect, and a crafted template can allocate toward V8's string or process memory limit and crash the process. This issue is fixed in version 10.27.2.
CVE-2026-69222
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (48th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 49EG Risk 49/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity75% × 45%The EG Score, 7.5 of 10.Exploitation0.6% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.6%
- EPSS %ILE
- 48th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
August 19, 2026
Last Modified
September 9, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Aug 19, 2026v10.27.2
Patch available: harttle/liquidjs v10.27.2
https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/releases/tag/v10.27.2commit 7ab49f999ac0 (harttle/liquidjs)
Patch available: harttle/liquidjs v11.0.0-alpha.1 (contains commit 7ab49f999ac0)
https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/commit/7ab49f999ac045ec1e87f3a7a9fd68dd9e8602b3fix: charge join/json/inspect filters by produced output size
Patch available: harttle/liquidjs v11.0.0-alpha.1 (PR #925 merged 2026-07-06)
https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/pull/925Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in `join` filter allows template authors to bypass `memoryLimit` and crash the process · Advisory · harttle/liquidjs · GitHub
https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/security/advisories/GHSA-4r6h-5v86-94p3Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-69222(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| liquidjs | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 50× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-13 09:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-08 06:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-06 16:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-06 03:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-05 09:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-03 16:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-03 00:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-01 22:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
Show 73 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-30 20:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-30 08:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 21:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-27 16:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-27 04:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-24 15:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 03:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-23 02:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 01:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-21 01:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-19 23:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 22:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-17 21:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 20:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-15 04:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 03:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 02:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 01:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-11 13:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-10 12:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-09 02:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-08 04:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-06 14:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-06 02:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-05 01:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 13:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-02 23:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-01 22:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-01 10:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-30 21:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-30 08:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-29 08:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 02:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-26 01:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-25 00:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 12:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 11:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-22 10:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-21 22:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 22:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 10:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 22:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-19 21:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 21:04 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 7.5 HIGH
- 2026-08-19 21:03 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownnpm:liquidjs
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-69222?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-69222 published?
Is CVE-2026-69222 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-69222?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-69222?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-69222
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-69222?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.