CVE-2026-68469

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scored
—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

wifi: mwifiex: fix permanently busy scans after multiple roam iterations

In order for the firmware to sleep, the driver has to confirm a previously received sleep request. The normal sequence of evets goes like this: EVENT_SLEEP -> adapter->ps_state = PS_STATE_PRE_SLEEP -> sleep-confirm -> SLEEP -> EVENT_AWAKE -> AWAKE. Before sending the sleep-confirm command, the driver must make sure there are no commands either running or waiting to be completed.

mwifiex_ret_802_11_associate() unconditionally sets ps_state = PS_STATE_AWAKE when it processes the association command response, outside of the normal powersave management flow. If EVENT_SLEEP arrives while the association command is in flight, ps_state is PRE_SLEEP when the association command response is parsed, and the forced AWAKE overwrites it. The deferred sleep-confirm is never sent.

A subsequent scan_start command is correctly acknowledged, but the firmware doesn't generate scan_result events. The scan request never finishes, and additional requests from userspace fail with -EBUSY.

After testing on both IW412 and W8997, I could only trigger the bug on the IW412 and observed the firmwares behave differently. On the IW412 the firmware still sends EVENT_SLEEP while the authentication / association process is ongoing. A W8997 under the same conditions seems to suppress power-save for the duration of the association, so PRE_SLEEP never coincided with the association response even after extended periods of testing using the loops described below (>12hours).

On the IW412, the delay between commands that triggers an EVENT_SLEEP was empirically determined to be ~20ms. This delay can naturally occur when the driver is outputting debugging information (debug_mask = 0x00000037), in which situation the busy scans issue is repeatable while running "test 1)" as described below. If the delay between commands is less than ~20ms, the firmware stays awake and the issue was not reproducible running the same test.

The host_mlme=false path also behaves differently. In this case, the entire authentication / association transaction is executed by one command (HostCmd_CMD_802_11_ASSOCIATE), and the firmware doesn't emit EVENT_SLEEP while the command is running.

Remove the assignment so the ps_state is only manipulated in the paths that are related to powersave event handling and on the main workqueue for correct sleep confirmation.

The following loop tests were performed (with debugging output enabled): 1) force roaming between two AP's, one 5GHz and one 2.4GHz, same SSID. Use wpa_cli to trigger the roaming behavior, sleep 2s between iterations. 2) force a disconnection to AP 1 and a connection to AP 2, test scan. Use wpa_cli to trigger the connection changes, sleep 2s between iterations.

Each test ran in each device for at least 3 hours.

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
17th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

EG Severity
Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the BOD 26-04 block below.

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-68469(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(8)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (55 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.180-1: fixed in 6.1.180-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (31 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.100-1: fixed in 6.12.100-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (160 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.5-1: fixed in 7.1.5-1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(8)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 38× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 83 are merged into the row they repeat.

  1. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  2. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  3. 2026-10-18 03:19 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  5. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  6. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  7. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  8. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  9. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  10. 2026-10-12 15:45 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 19:30 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 16:45 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 14:06 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  15. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  16. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  17. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  18. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  19. 2026-10-06 23:40 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-06 23:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mc74-x78c-h295
  21. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  22. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  23. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  24. 2026-10-03 22:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mc74-x78c-h295
  25. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
Show 56 more
  1. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  2. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  3. 2026-09-30 21:38 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-30 21:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mc74-x78c-h295
  5. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  6. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  7. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  8. 2026-09-27 08:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mc74-x78c-h295
  9. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  10. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  11. 2026-09-23 01:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mc74-x78c-h295
  12. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  13. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  14. 2026-09-20 00:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mc74-x78c-h295
  15. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  16. 2026-09-16 23:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mc74-x78c-h295
  17. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  18. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  19. 2026-09-13 18:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mc74-x78c-h295
  20. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  21. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  22. 2026-09-10 17:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mc74-x78c-h295
  23. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  24. 2026-09-07 16:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mc74-x78c-h295
  25. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  26. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  27. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  28. 2026-09-04 12:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mc74-x78c-h295
  29. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  30. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  31. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  32. 2026-09-01 11:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mc74-x78c-h295
  33. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  34. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  35. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  36. 2026-08-29 10:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mc74-x78c-h295
  37. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  38. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  39. 2026-08-26 09:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mc74-x78c-h295
  40. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  41. 2026-08-23 08:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mc74-x78c-h295
  42. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  43. 2026-08-20 22:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  44. 2026-08-20 07:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mc74-x78c-h295
  45. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  46. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  47. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  48. 2026-08-17 06:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mc74-x78c-h295
  49. 2026-08-17 06:18 UTCNVD update
  50. 2026-08-17 05:35 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-08-17 05:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mc74-x78c-h295
  52. 2026-08-17 05:24 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  53. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  54. 2026-08-15 06:20 UTCNVD update
  55. 2026-08-15 06:20 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-08-15 06:02 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-68469?
CVE-2026-68469 is a vulnerability whose severity is not yet rated; its CVE record was published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: mwifiex: fix permanently busy scans after multiple roam iterations In order for the firmware to sleep, the driver has to confirm a previously received sleep request. The normal sequence of evets goes like this: EVENTSLEEP ->…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-68469 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-68469 was published on August 15, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-68469 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-68469 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (17th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-68469?
A fix for CVE-2026-68469 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-68469 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-68469

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-68469?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.