In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: fix potential deadlock in gc_merge path of f2fs_balance_fs()
When we mount device w/ gc_merge mount option, we may suffer below
potential deadlock:
Kworker GC trehad Truncator
- f2fs_write_cache_pages
- f2fs_write_single_data_page
- f2fs_do_write_data_page
- folio_start_writeback --- set writeback flag on folio
- f2fs_outplace_write_data
: cached folio in internal bio cache
- f2fs_balance_fs
- wake_up(gc_thread)
: wake up gc thread to run foreground GC
: wait on the waitqueue --- wait on GC thread to finish the work
- truncate_inode_pages_range
- __filemap_get_folio(, FGP_LOCK) --- lock folio
- truncate_inode_partial_folio
- folio_wait_writeback --- wait on writeback being cleared
- do_garbage_collect
- move_data_page
- f2fs_get_lock_data_folio
- lock on folio --- blocked on folio's lock
In order to avoid such deadlock, let's call below functions to commit
cached bios in GC_MERGE path of f2fs_balance_fs() as the same as we did
in NOGC_MERGE path.
- f2fs_submit_merged_write(sbi, DATA);
- f2fs_submit_all_merged_ipu_writes(sbi);
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
- EG Severity
- Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the BOD 26-04 block below.
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it