CVE-2026-68458

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-15. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

binder: cache secctx size before release zeroes it

binder_transaction() bounds the scatter-gather buffer area with sg_buf_end_offset and subtracts the aligned LSM context size because the secctx is written at the tail of that area. The subtraction reads lsmctx.len, but that field has already been cleared by the time the line runs:

security_secid_to_secctx(secid, &lsmctx) /* lsmctx.len set */ lsmctx_aligned_size = ALIGN(lsmctx.len, sizeof(u64)) extra_buffers_size += lsmctx_aligned_size ... security_release_secctx(&lsmctx) /* memset zeroes len */ ... sg_buf_end_offset = sg_buf_offset + extra_buffers_size

  • ALIGN(lsmctx.len, sizeof(u64)) /* ALIGN(0,8) */

security_release_secctx() does memset(cp, 0, sizeof(*cp)), so lsmctx.len reads back as 0 and the subtraction contributes nothing, leaving sg_buf_end_offset too large by the aligned secctx size on every transaction to a txn_security_ctx node.

Each BINDER_TYPE_PTR object then derives buf_left = sg_buf_end_offset - sg_buf_offset as the sole upper bound on its copy, so the inflated end offset lets the copy run into the bytes that already hold the secctx.

The aligned size must therefore be cached before release rather than re-read from the now-cleared field. Fix by caching it in lsmctx_aligned_size at function scope when it is first computed and subtracting lsmctx_aligned_size instead of re-reading lsmctx.len after release. Reuse the same value for the earlier buf_offset computation.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(high)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Aug 17, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

binder: cache secctx size before release zeroes it - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b34826e55aad3520ec813f1f367c11b24b29dc9f
generic

binder: cache secctx size before release zeroes it - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4257f45ee1fddd0558e77b62af8bb63fd87b2162
generic

binder: cache secctx size before release zeroes it - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1228926e1e4d605cc74d9e675558982a6f2cf446

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-68458(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 25× in last 7d / 25× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-20 22:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-20 22:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-20 10:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-19 21:27 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-19 21:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-19 08:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-18 20:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-18 07:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-17 19:04 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-17 19:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-17 06:30 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-17 06:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-17 06:01 UTCEG score recompute 7.80
  16. 2026-08-17 06:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-17 05:54 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  18. 2026-08-17 05:35 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-17 05:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-17 05:25 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  21. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-15 06:20 UTCNVD update
  24. 2026-08-15 06:20 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-15 06:02 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-68458?
CVE-2026-68458 is a high vulnerability published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: binder: cache secctx size before release zeroes it binder_transaction() bounds the scatter-gather buffer area with sgbufend_offset and subtracts the aligned LSM context size because the secctx is written at the tail of that area.…
When was CVE-2026-68458 disclosed?
CVE-2026-68458 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 15, 2026, with the most recent update on August 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-68458 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-68458 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.2% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-68458?
CVE-2026-68458 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-68458?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-68458, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-68458

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-68458?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.