In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
smp: Make CSD lock acquisition atomic for debug mode
Commit b0473dcd4b1d ("smp: Improve smp_call_function_single()
CSD-lock diagnostics") changed smp_call_function_single() so that,
when CSD lock debugging is enabled, async !wait calls use the
destination CPU csd_data. That improves diagnostics, but it also removes
the single-writer property that made the old csd_lock() safe: multiple
CPUs can now prepare the same destination CPU CSD concurrently.
csd_lock() currently waits for CSD_FLAG_LOCK to clear and then sets the
bit with a non-atomic read-modify-write. Two senders can both see an
unlocked CSD, set the bit, overwrite the callback fields, and enqueue
the same llist node. Re-adding a node that is already the queue head can
make node->next point to itself, leaving the target CPU stuck walking
call_single_queue. Later synchronous work, such as a TLB shootdown, can
then remain queued and trigger soft-lockup warnings or panics.
Keep the single csd_lock() implementation, but when CSD lock debugging is
enabled, acquire CSD_FLAG_LOCK with try_cmpxchg_acquire(). This makes the
destination CPU CSD a real atomic lock in the only configuration where it
can be shared by multiple remote senders, while preserving the existing
non-debug fast path.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
- EG Severity
- Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the BOD 26-04 block below.
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it