CVE-2026-68431

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.19.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-08-12. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
9.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 9.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ksmbd: validate minimum PDU size for transform requests

The receive path applies the minimum SMB2 PDU size check only when ProtocolId is SMB2_PROTO_NUMBER. A packet carrying SMB2_TRANSFORM_PROTO_NUM bypasses the check even when the negotiated dialect does not provide transform handling.

On an SMB 2.1 connection, a short transform packet therefore reaches init_smb2_rsp_hdr(), which interprets the request as a full SMB2 header and reads beyond the request allocation. The copied fields can then be returned to the unauthenticated client.

Compression transforms are converted to ordinary SMB2 messages before protocol validation. After that conversion, validate ordinary SMB2 requests against SMB2_MIN_SUPPORTED_PDU_SIZE and require encryption transform requests to contain both a transform header and an SMB2 header. This rejects truncated requests before work allocation.

CVSS v3
9.1
EG Score
9.1CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
41
EG Risk 41/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity91% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.4% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
29th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.1 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-18). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 12, 2026

Last Modified

August 23, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Sep 15, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

ksmbd: validate minimum PDU size for transform requests - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d9e9753dfd43bd27c956578df7804a3c90b80fdc
Web page

ksmbd: validate minimum PDU size for transform requests - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d8e5c5672724b8f3c4c099d2cf60239c996e5424
Web page

ksmbd: validate minimum PDU size for transform requests - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cfc0b8e5080aec87700774e8568765eaa4b7b92b
Web page

ksmbd: validate minimum PDU size for transform requests - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b62c510f59803f82f9b4c76ead2a56833b2984c7
Web page

ksmbd: validate minimum PDU size for transform requests - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/928dda88d0e13fbca381255028f65b244343a4ea
Web page

ksmbd: validate minimum PDU size for transform requests - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/32e486b70c256d5ef4baa5a2936ade2fea50e8eb
Web page

ksmbd: validate minimum PDU size for transform requests - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/22f1aa35b87e471cc31b35b74451f46630863b12

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-68431(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(7)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (56 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.187-1: fixed in 6.1.187-1
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.107-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (33 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.105-1: fixed in 6.12.105-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (161 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.6-1: fixed in 7.1.6-1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(7)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 165× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 435 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 335 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  2. 2026-10-19 13:40 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-19 13:40 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-19 13:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  5. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  6. 2026-10-18 13:41 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-18 13:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  8. 2026-10-18 03:19 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  10. 2026-10-17 14:00 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-17 13:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  12. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  13. 2026-10-16 14:17 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-16 14:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  15. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  16. 2026-10-15 14:17 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-15 14:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  18. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  19. 2026-10-14 09:01 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-14 09:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  21. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  22. 2026-10-13 05:40 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-13 05:40 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-13 05:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  25. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-12 15:45 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-12 05:58 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-12 05:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  4. 2026-10-11 19:30 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 16:45 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 14:06 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  9. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  10. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  11. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  12. 2026-10-07 07:51 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-07 07:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  14. 2026-10-07 03:22 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-07 03:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  16. 2026-10-06 23:03 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-06 23:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  18. 2026-10-06 17:34 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-06 17:34 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-06 17:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  21. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  22. 2026-10-05 19:28 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-05 19:28 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-05 19:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  25. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  26. 2026-10-05 14:50 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-05 14:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  28. 2026-10-05 07:36 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-05 07:36 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-05 07:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  31. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  32. 2026-10-04 22:33 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-04 22:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  34. 2026-10-04 13:23 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-04 13:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  36. 2026-10-04 08:56 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-04 08:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  38. 2026-10-04 04:12 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-04 04:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  40. 2026-10-03 20:26 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-10-03 20:26 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-03 20:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  43. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  44. 2026-10-03 02:34 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-03 02:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  46. 2026-10-02 22:14 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-10-02 22:14 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-02 22:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  49. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  50. 2026-10-02 16:18 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-02 16:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  52. 2026-10-02 08:24 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-10-02 08:24 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-02 08:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  55. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  56. 2026-10-01 15:14 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-01 15:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  58. 2026-10-01 10:55 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-10-01 10:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  60. 2026-10-01 06:37 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-01 06:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  62. 2026-10-01 02:18 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-10-01 02:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  64. 2026-09-30 22:00 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-09-30 22:00 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-09-30 21:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  67. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  68. 2026-09-29 04:54 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-09-29 04:54 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-09-29 04:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  71. 2026-09-28 15:24 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-09-28 15:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  73. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  74. 2026-09-28 10:49 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-09-28 10:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pm5-g7cv-g948 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-68431?
CVE-2026-68431 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 12, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: validate minimum PDU size for transform requests The receive path applies the minimum SMB2 PDU size check only when ProtocolId is SMB2PROTONUMBER. A packet carrying SMB2TRANSFORMPROTO_NUM bypasses the check even when the…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-68431 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-68431 was published on August 12, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 23, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-68431 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-68431 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (29th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-68431?
CVE-2026-68431 has a CVSS base score of 9.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-68431?
A fix for CVE-2026-68431 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-68431 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-68431

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-68431?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.