CVE-2026-68315

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-10. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

sctp: validate stream count in sctp_process_strreset_inreq()

When processing a RESET_IN_REQUEST from a peer, sctp_process_strreset_inreq() derives the stream count from the parameter length but does not check whether the resulting RESET_OUT_REQUEST would exceed SCTP_MAX_CHUNK_LEN.

The OUT request header (sctp_strreset_outreq, 16 bytes) is 8 bytes larger than the IN request header (sctp_strreset_inreq, 8 bytes). Generally, the IP payload is bounded to 65535 bytes, so the stream list cannot be large enough to trigger the overflow. However, on interfaces with MTU > 65535 (e.g., loopback with IPv6 jumbograms), a stream list that fits within the incoming IN parameter can cause a __u16 overflow in sctp_make_strreset_req() when computing the OUT request size, leading to an undersized skb allocation and a kernel BUG:

net/core/skbuff.c:207 skb_panic net/core/skbuff.c:2625 skb_put net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:1535 sctp_addto_chunk net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:3695 sctp_make_strreset_req net/sctp/stream.c:655 sctp_process_strreset_inreq

The local setsockopt path validates the generated reset request size. However, for an incoming-only reset, it accounts for the smaller IN request even though the peer must generate an OUT request with the same stream list. Such a request cannot be completed successfully by the peer.

Reject peer IN requests whose corresponding OUT request would exceed SCTP_MAX_CHUNK_LEN. Also tighten the local check so it does not send an IN request that would require an oversized OUT request from the peer.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5(high)
EG Risk
38(Track)
EG Risk 38/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity75% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
41%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 10, 2026

Last Modified

August 19, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Aug 14, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

sctp: validate stream count in sctp_process_strreset_inreq() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b255d8cd6cc68045ae9eecbac3b3c14e1f176c9b
generic

sctp: validate stream count in sctp_process_strreset_inreq() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6f0e39d180cd7cced647381b6fa14fd83d261047
generic

sctp: validate stream count in sctp_process_strreset_inreq() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1a10fe1aa9c01f41b389a31906a77d538637c9d9
generic

sctp: validate stream count in sctp_process_strreset_inreq() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/18ae07691d43183d270de8be9dc8e027906015d9
generic

sctp: validate stream count in sctp_process_strreset_inreq() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/00ae679cb21a035491fdad8d58dc6d79cc68b675

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-68315(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 37× in last 7d / 49× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-21 02:58 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-21 02:58 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-21 02:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-20 22:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-20 15:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-20 04:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-19 17:24 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-19 17:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-19 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-19 16:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-19 14:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-19 02:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-18 15:18 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-08-18 15:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-18 04:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-17 16:48 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-17 16:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-17 05:37 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-17 05:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-17 05:06 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-17 05:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 24 more
  1. 2026-08-16 18:59 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-16 18:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-16 07:40 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-16 07:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-15 20:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-15 09:19 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-15 09:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-14 22:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-14 10:57 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-14 10:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-13 23:46 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-13 23:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-13 22:44 UTCEG score recompute 7.50
  16. 2026-08-13 22:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-13 22:44 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.5 · severity → HIGH
  18. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-13 11:19 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-13 11:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-10 13:24 UTCNVD update
  23. 2026-08-10 12:19 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-10 12:17 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-68315?
CVE-2026-68315 is a high vulnerability published on August 10, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sctp: validate stream count in sctpprocessstrreset_inreq() When processing a RESETINREQUEST from a peer, sctpprocessstrreset_inreq() derives the stream count from the parameter length but does not check whether the resulting…
When was CVE-2026-68315 disclosed?
CVE-2026-68315 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 10, 2026, with the most recent update on August 19, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-68315 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-68315 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 58.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-68315?
CVE-2026-68315 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-68315?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-68315, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-68315

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-68315?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.