CVE-2026-68315

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-10. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

sctp: validate stream count in sctp_process_strreset_inreq()

When processing a RESET_IN_REQUEST from a peer, sctp_process_strreset_inreq() derives the stream count from the parameter length but does not check whether the resulting RESET_OUT_REQUEST would exceed SCTP_MAX_CHUNK_LEN.

The OUT request header (sctp_strreset_outreq, 16 bytes) is 8 bytes larger than the IN request header (sctp_strreset_inreq, 8 bytes). Generally, the IP payload is bounded to 65535 bytes, so the stream list cannot be large enough to trigger the overflow. However, on interfaces with MTU > 65535 (e.g., loopback with IPv6 jumbograms), a stream list that fits within the incoming IN parameter can cause a __u16 overflow in sctp_make_strreset_req() when computing the OUT request size, leading to an undersized skb allocation and a kernel BUG:

net/core/skbuff.c:207 skb_panic net/core/skbuff.c:2625 skb_put net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:1535 sctp_addto_chunk net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:3695 sctp_make_strreset_req net/sctp/stream.c:655 sctp_process_strreset_inreq

The local setsockopt path validates the generated reset request size. However, for an incoming-only reset, it accounts for the smaller IN request even though the peer must generate an OUT request with the same stream list. Such a request cannot be completed successfully by the peer.

Reject peer IN requests whose corresponding OUT request would exceed SCTP_MAX_CHUNK_LEN. Also tighten the local check so it does not send an IN request that would require an oversized OUT request from the peer.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
38
EG Risk 38/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity75% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
41st
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

August 10, 2026

Last Modified

August 19, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Aug 14, 2026
Patch available.
generic

sctp: validate stream count in sctp_process_strreset_inreq() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b255d8cd6cc68045ae9eecbac3b3c14e1f176c9b
generic

sctp: validate stream count in sctp_process_strreset_inreq() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6f0e39d180cd7cced647381b6fa14fd83d261047
generic

sctp: validate stream count in sctp_process_strreset_inreq() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1a10fe1aa9c01f41b389a31906a77d538637c9d9
generic

sctp: validate stream count in sctp_process_strreset_inreq() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/18ae07691d43183d270de8be9dc8e027906015d9
generic

sctp: validate stream count in sctp_process_strreset_inreq() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/00ae679cb21a035491fdad8d58dc6d79cc68b675

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-687.47.1.el9_82026-09-14redhat
redhatkernel-rt-0:4.18.0-553.162.1.rt7.503.el8_102026-09-10redhat
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-553.162.1.el8_102026-09-10redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (56 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.187-1: fixed in 6.1.187-1
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.101-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.101-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (32 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.101-1: fixed in 6.12.101-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (161 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.6-1: fixed in 7.1.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 27× in last 7d / 139× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 269 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-05 07:50 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 07:50 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-05 07:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-04 16:42 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-04 16:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-10-04 05:23 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-04 05:23 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-04 05:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-10-03 00:54 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-03 00:54 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-03 00:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-10-02 09:20 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-02 09:20 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-02 09:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-10-01 10:07 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-01 10:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-30 22:38 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-30 22:38 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-09-30 22:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-09-29 05:24 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-29 05:24 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-09-29 05:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-28 13:36 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-09-28 13:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-28 02:25 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-28 02:25 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-28 02:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-27 13:09 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-09-27 13:09 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-09-27 13:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-25 04:03 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-25 04:03 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-09-25 04:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-24 08:23 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-24 08:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-23 21:12 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-23 21:12 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-23 21:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-23 08:42 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-23 08:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-22 21:31 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-22 21:31 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-09-22 21:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-09-22 10:20 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-09-22 10:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-09-21 23:00 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-21 23:00 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-09-21 23:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-09-21 11:13 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-09-21 11:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-09-20 22:43 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-09-20 22:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-09-20 10:57 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-09-20 10:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-09-19 23:46 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-19 23:46 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-09-19 23:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-09-19 12:35 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-09-19 12:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-09-19 00:33 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-19 00:33 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-09-19 00:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-09-18 13:19 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-09-18 13:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-09-18 02:08 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-09-18 02:08 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-09-18 02:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-09-17 14:57 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-09-17 14:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-09-17 00:47 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-09-17 00:47 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-09-17 00:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-09-16 02:34 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-09-16 02:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-09-15 13:54 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-09-15 13:54 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-09-15 13:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-09-15 00:32 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-09-15 00:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-09-14 10:53 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-09-14 10:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-09-13 23:42 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-09-13 23:42 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-09-13 23:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-09-13 12:31 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-09-13 12:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-09-13 01:20 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-68315?
CVE-2026-68315 is a high vulnerability published on August 10, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sctp: validate stream count in sctpprocessstrreset_inreq() When processing a RESETINREQUEST from a peer, sctpprocessstrreset_inreq() derives the stream count from the parameter length but does not check whether the resulting…
When was CVE-2026-68315 disclosed?
CVE-2026-68315 was first published on August 10, 2026, with the most recent update on August 19, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-68315 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-68315 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (41st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-68315?
CVE-2026-68315 has a CVSS base score of 7.5 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-68315?
A fix for CVE-2026-68315 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-68315 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-68315

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-68315?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.