CVE-2026-68186

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scored
—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

binfmt_misc: set have_execfd only once the interpreter is opened

load_misc_binary() raises bprm->have_execfd as soon as it sees the 'O' (or 'C') flag. This happens well before it opens the interpreter. If that open fails the flag stays set on the bprm. binfmt_misc is at the head of the format list so an interpreter open failure that returns -ENOEXEC lets the search fall through to a later format. This means it runs the matched binary directly having never staged an interpreter. So bprm->executable is NULL while have_execfd falsely claims a descriptor is present.

Consequently, begin_new_exec() dereferences the missing executable:

would_dump(bprm, bprm->executable);

and NULL derefs. Had it not, the hand-off later in the same function would have failed anyway. FD_ADD(0, bprm->executable) rejects a NULL file with -ENOMEM. Both sites are past the point of no return so the exec cannot be unwound either way.

This can be reached by unprivileged users as binfmt_misc can be mounted in user namespaces. So a user can register an 'O' entry whose interpreter lives on a FUSE mount, have the FUSE server fail the open with -ENOEXEC and execute a native ELF file that matches the entry.

have_execfd only means anything alongside the executable it describes which is not set until the interpreter has been opened and staged. So lets raise it there, next to execfd_creds, which is already set at that point. An open failure now leaves it clear, so the fallback format derives credentials from the binary and emits no AT_EXECFD, as it would for any native exec. The argv rewrite load_misc_binary() performs before the open is still not undone. This means the binary sees the interpreter path in argv[0] and its own path in argv[1] but that predates this change and only became observable once the exec stopped faulting.

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
11th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

EG Severity
Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the BOD 26-04 block below.

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 10, 2026

Last Modified

August 19, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-68186(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(8)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (56 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.187-1: fixed in 6.1.187-1
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.101-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.101-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (32 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.101-1: fixed in 6.12.101-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (161 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.6-1: fixed in 7.1.6-1
—

Additional Vendor Advisories

(8)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 42× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 102 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 3 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  2. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  3. 2026-10-18 03:20 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  5. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  6. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  7. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  8. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  9. 2026-10-12 15:45 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 19:30 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 16:45 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 14:06 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  14. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  15. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  16. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  17. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  18. 2026-10-07 01:23 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-07 01:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2h9p-pp39-9929
  20. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  21. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  22. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  23. 2026-10-04 05:25 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-04 05:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2h9p-pp39-9929
  25. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  2. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  3. 2026-09-30 22:41 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-30 22:41 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-09-30 22:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2h9p-pp39-9929
  6. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  7. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  8. 2026-09-27 16:57 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-09-27 16:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2h9p-pp39-9929
  10. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  11. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  12. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  13. 2026-09-23 15:12 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-09-23 15:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2h9p-pp39-9929
  15. 2026-09-20 20:20 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-09-20 20:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2h9p-pp39-9929
  17. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  18. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  19. 2026-09-18 00:50 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-09-18 00:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2h9p-pp39-9929
  21. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  22. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  23. 2026-09-15 00:42 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-15 00:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2h9p-pp39-9929
  25. 2026-09-12 00:45 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-09-12 00:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2h9p-pp39-9929
  27. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  28. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  29. 2026-09-09 05:54 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-09-09 05:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2h9p-pp39-9929
  31. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  32. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  33. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  34. 2026-09-05 21:47 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-09-05 21:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2h9p-pp39-9929
  36. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  37. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  38. 2026-09-03 02:56 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-09-03 02:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2h9p-pp39-9929
  40. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  41. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  42. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  43. 2026-08-30 20:50 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-30 20:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2h9p-pp39-9929
  45. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  46. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  47. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  48. 2026-08-28 01:59 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-08-28 01:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2h9p-pp39-9929
  50. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  51. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  52. 2026-08-25 07:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2h9p-pp39-9929
  53. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  54. 2026-08-22 12:17 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-08-22 12:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2h9p-pp39-9929
  56. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  57. 2026-08-20 22:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  58. 2026-08-19 17:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2h9p-pp39-9929
  59. 2026-08-19 17:21 UTCNVD update
  60. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  61. 2026-08-19 16:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2h9p-pp39-9929
  62. 2026-08-19 16:43 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  63. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  64. 2026-08-17 05:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2h9p-pp39-9929
  65. 2026-08-17 05:26 UTCNVD update
  66. 2026-08-17 05:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2h9p-pp39-9929
  67. 2026-08-17 05:05 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  68. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  69. 2026-08-16 03:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2h9p-pp39-9929
  70. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  71. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  72. 2026-08-13 08:18 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-08-13 08:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2h9p-pp39-9929
  74. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-68186?
CVE-2026-68186 is a vulnerability whose severity is not yet rated; its CVE record was published on August 10, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: binfmtmisc: set haveexecfd only once the interpreter is opened loadmiscbinary() raises bprm->have_execfd as soon as it sees the 'O' (or 'C') flag. This happens well before it opens the interpreter. If that open fails the flag stays…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-68186 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-68186 was published on August 10, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-68186 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-68186 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (11th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-68186?
A fix for CVE-2026-68186 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-68186 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-68186

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-68186?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.