CVE-2026-68167

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scored
—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: do not try compression for data reloc inodes

[BUG] There is a syzbot report that the check inside get_new_location() triggered:

BTRFS info (device loop0): found 31 extents, stage: move data extents BTRFS info (device loop0): leaf 8908800 gen 16 total ptrs 28 free space 1676 owner 18446744073709551607 item 0 key (256 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 3835 itemsize 160 inode generation 5 transid 0 size 0 nbytes 0 block group 0 mode 40755 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0 sequence 0 flags 0x0 atime 1669132761.0 ctime 1669132761.0 mtime 1669132761.0 otime 0.0 item 1 key (256 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 3823 itemsize 12 index 0 name_len 2 item 2 key (258 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 3663 itemsize 160 inode generation 1 transid 16 size 733184 nbytes 106496 block group 0 mode 100600 links 0 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0 sequence 24 flags 0x18 item 3 key (258 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 3595 itemsize 68 generation 16 type 0 inline extent data size 47 ram_bytes 4096 compression 1 [...] item 27 key (18446744073709551611 ORPHAN_ITEM 258) itemoff 2376 itemsize 0 BTRFS error (device loop0): unexpected non-zero offset in file extent item for data reloc inode 258 key offset 0 offset 9277520992061368337 ------------[ cut here ]------------ btrfs_abort_should_print_stack(__error)

[CAUSE] The above dump tree shows the first file extent item is inlined, which should make no sense for data reloc inodes, as such inodes just represent where the data extents are in the relocation destination chunk.

However the relocation path preallocates space for each block, then dirties them, cluster by cluster. It's possible to have a single block at the beginning of the block group, and no other block in the same cluster.

So relocation will preallocate a file extent for that block and dirty the first block. Then memory pressure forces the data reloc inode to be written back, before any other blocks are dirtied/allocated.

Finally commit 3eaf5f082c4c ("btrfs: extract inlined creation into a dedicated delalloc helper") changed the sequence of delalloc. Before that commit we always tried NOCOW first, so that dirtied block would be written back into the preallocated space, and appear as a regular extent.

But with that commit, we always try inline first, and since compression is forced, we try compressing the first block, and then inline the compressed data, resulting in the above inlined file extent in the data reloc tree.

Then the check in get_new_location() will check the file offset, without checking if the file extent is inlined or not, resulting in the above failure.

[FIX] Do not allow compression for data reloc inodes.

Since data reloc inode sizes are always block aligned, as long as we do not compress, @data_len will always be at least one block, and that will cause can_cow_file_range_inline() to return false, thus no inlined extent will be created.

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
8th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

EG Severity
Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the BOD 26-04 block below.

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 10, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-68167(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (161 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.6-1: fixed in 7.1.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 35× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  2. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  3. 2026-10-18 03:20 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  5. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  6. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  7. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  8. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  9. 2026-10-12 15:45 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 19:30 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 16:45 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 14:06 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  14. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  15. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  16. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  17. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  18. 2026-10-07 03:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rgmh-vxfr-qmw9
  19. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  20. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  21. 2026-10-04 05:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rgmh-vxfr-qmw9
  22. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  23. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  24. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  25. 2026-10-01 05:57 UTCEG score recompute
Show 58 more
  1. 2026-10-01 05:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rgmh-vxfr-qmw9
  2. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  3. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  4. 2026-09-28 07:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rgmh-vxfr-qmw9
  5. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  6. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  7. 2026-09-25 09:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rgmh-vxfr-qmw9
  8. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  9. 2026-09-22 11:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rgmh-vxfr-qmw9
  10. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  11. 2026-09-19 12:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rgmh-vxfr-qmw9
  12. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  13. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  14. 2026-09-16 11:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rgmh-vxfr-qmw9
  15. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  16. 2026-09-13 13:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rgmh-vxfr-qmw9
  17. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  18. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  19. 2026-09-10 15:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rgmh-vxfr-qmw9
  20. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  21. 2026-09-07 17:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rgmh-vxfr-qmw9
  22. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  23. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  24. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  25. 2026-09-04 15:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rgmh-vxfr-qmw9
  26. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  27. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  28. 2026-09-01 16:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rgmh-vxfr-qmw9
  29. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  30. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  31. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  32. 2026-08-29 10:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rgmh-vxfr-qmw9
  33. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  34. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  35. 2026-08-25 23:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rgmh-vxfr-qmw9
  36. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  37. 2026-08-23 01:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rgmh-vxfr-qmw9
  38. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  39. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  40. 2026-08-20 22:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  41. 2026-08-20 03:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rgmh-vxfr-qmw9
  42. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  43. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  44. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  45. 2026-08-17 05:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rgmh-vxfr-qmw9
  46. 2026-08-17 05:26 UTCNVD update
  47. 2026-08-17 05:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rgmh-vxfr-qmw9
  48. 2026-08-17 05:05 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  49. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  50. 2026-08-16 09:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rgmh-vxfr-qmw9
  51. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  52. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  53. 2026-08-13 11:31 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-08-13 11:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rgmh-vxfr-qmw9
  55. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  56. 2026-08-10 13:24 UTCNVD update
  57. 2026-08-10 12:20 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-08-10 12:17 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-68167?
CVE-2026-68167 is a vulnerability whose severity is not yet rated; its CVE record was published on August 10, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: do not try compression for data reloc inodes [BUG] There is a syzbot report that the check inside getnewlocation() triggered: BTRFS info (device loop0): found 31 extents, stage: move data extents BTRFS info (device loop0):…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-68167 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-68167 was published on August 10, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-68167 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-68167 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (8th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-68167?
A fix for CVE-2026-68167 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-68167 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-68167

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-68167?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.