CVE-2026-68147

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-10. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fscrypt: Avoid dynamic allocation in fscrypt_get_devices()

When a blk_crypto_key starts being used or is evicted, fs/crypto/ calls fscrypt_get_devices() to get the filesystem's list of block devices, then iterates over them and calls blk_crypto_config_supported(), blk_crypto_start_using_key(), or blk_crypto_evict_key() on each one.

Currently, the block device pointers are placed in a dynamically allocated array. This dynamic allocation is problematic because:

  • It can fail, especially at the fscrypt_destroy_inline_crypt_key() call
site when it's invoked for inode eviction under direct reclaim.
  • fscrypt_destroy_inline_crypt_key() doesn't handle the failure. It
just zeroizes and frees the blk_crypto_key without calling blk_crypto_evict_key(). That causes a use-after-free.

For now, let's fix this in the straightforward and easily-backportable way by switching to an on-stack array. Currently the fscrypt multi-device functionality is used only by f2fs, which has a hardcoded limit of 8 block devices. An on-stack array works fine for that.

(Of course, this solution won't scale up to large number of block devices. For that we'd need a different solution, like moving the block device iteration into the filesystem. Or in the case of btrfs, which will only support blk-crypto-fallback, we should make it just call blk-crypto-fallback directly, so the block devices won't be needed.)

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(high)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 10, 2026

Last Modified

August 19, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Aug 14, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

fscrypt: Avoid dynamic allocation in fscrypt_get_devices() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bc2d630296e0e049210ec05ff08459a6893ae749
generic

fscrypt: Avoid dynamic allocation in fscrypt_get_devices() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/97a688563be71ec6fefc071aff69a66c69dbe244
generic

fscrypt: Avoid dynamic allocation in fscrypt_get_devices() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/81ea8e8221853950c47dac7164f27c63a96f8f86
generic

fscrypt: Avoid dynamic allocation in fscrypt_get_devices() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6fe4e4b8259e1330945b5f3c9476e08473b8e0e8
generic

fscrypt: Avoid dynamic allocation in fscrypt_get_devices() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4462ac3d90e897dda52ce4b6af2d526ddae835a8

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-68147(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 35× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-20 06:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-19 17:26 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-19 17:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-19 16:55 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-19 16:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-19 10:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-18 21:40 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-18 21:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-18 08:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-17 19:21 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-17 19:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-17 05:40 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-17 05:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-17 05:11 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-17 05:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-17 04:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-16 15:47 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-16 15:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-16 02:56 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-16 02:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-15 14:05 UTCEG score recompute
Show 16 more
  1. 2026-08-15 14:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-15 01:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-14 12:21 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-14 12:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-13 23:30 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-13 23:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-13 22:45 UTCEG score recompute 7.80
  9. 2026-08-13 22:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-13 22:44 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  11. 2026-08-13 10:56 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-13 10:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-10 13:24 UTCNVD update
  15. 2026-08-10 12:21 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-10 12:17 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-68147?
CVE-2026-68147 is a high vulnerability published on August 10, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fscrypt: Avoid dynamic allocation in fscryptgetdevices() When a blkcryptokey starts being used or is evicted, fs/crypto/ calls fscryptgetdevices() to get the filesystem's list of block devices, then iterates over them and calls…
When was CVE-2026-68147 disclosed?
CVE-2026-68147 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 10, 2026, with the most recent update on August 19, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-68147 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-68147 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 96.6% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-68147?
CVE-2026-68147 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-68147?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-68147, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-68147

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-68147?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.