CVE-2026-68136

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-08-10. a secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: gro: fix double aggregation of flush-marked skbs

Commit 0ab03f353d36 ("net-gro: Fix GRO flush when receiving a GSO packet.") added a flush check to skb_gro_receive(), but skb_gro_receive_list() lacks the same validation.

As a result, packets marked with NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->flush may still be re-aggregated.

This allows already-GRO'd packets with existing frag_list to be re-aggregated into a new GRO session, corrupting the frag_list chain structure. When skb_segment() attempts to unpack these malformed packets, it encounters invalid state and triggers a kernel panic.

Scenario (Tethering/Device forwarding):

  • Driver: Generated aggregated packet P1 via LRO with frag_list
  • Dev A: Receives aggregated fraglist packet and flush flag set
  • Dev A: Re-enters GRO, skb_gro_receive_list() is called
  • Missing flush check allows re-aggregation despite flush flag
  • Frag_list chain becomes corrupted (loops or dangling refs)
  • Dev B: TX path calls skb_segment(), crashes on corrupted frag_list

Root cause in skb_segment(): The check at line ~4891: if (hsize <= 0 && i >= nfrags && skb_headlen(list_skb) && (skb_headlen(list_skb) == len || sg)) {

When frag_list is corrupted by double aggregation, when list_skb is a NULL pointer from skb->next, skb_headlen(list_skb) dereference NULL/corrupted pointers occurs.

Call Trace: skb_headlen(NULL skb) skb_segment tcp_gso_segment tcp4_gso_segment inet_gso_segment skb_mac_gso_segment __skb_gso_segment skb_gso_segment validate_xmit_skb validate_xmit_skb_list sch_direct_xmit qdisc_restart __qdisc_run qdisc_run net_tx_action

Fix: Add NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->flush validation to the early-return check in skb_gro_receive_list(), matching the defensive programming pattern of skb_gro_receive().

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8(high)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity98% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
41%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 10, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Aug 17, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

net: gro: fix double aggregation of flush-marked skbs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fc0c0f7a207f0cd2d2aa725696c907f7d03af9e0
generic

net: gro: fix double aggregation of flush-marked skbs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e751256486d0ded20f5a9f9863467f1dce65142f
generic

net: gro: fix double aggregation of flush-marked skbs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a4dfd46cc8f08a29c6183794790547d0945f3d45
generic

net: gro: fix double aggregation of flush-marked skbs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/107e1a469f53a2a70874f3f12bf6fcd23925da1d

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-68136(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 60× in last 7d / 65× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-20 19:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-20 15:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-20 11:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-20 07:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-20 02:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-19 22:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-19 18:44 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-19 18:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-19 12:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-19 08:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-19 04:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-19 00:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-18 20:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-18 15:58 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-18 15:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-18 11:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-18 07:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-18 03:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-17 23:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-17 19:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-17 13:54 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-17 13:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 40 more
  1. 2026-08-17 09:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-17 05:40 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-17 05:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-17 05:11 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-17 05:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-17 01:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-16 21:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-16 17:24 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-16 17:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-16 13:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-16 09:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-16 05:03 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-16 05:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-16 00:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-15 20:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-15 16:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-15 12:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-15 08:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-15 04:21 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-15 04:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-15 00:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-14 20:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-14 15:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-14 11:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-08-14 07:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-08-14 03:37 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-08-14 03:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-13 23:31 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-13 23:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-08-13 22:46 UTCEG score recompute 9.80
  33. 2026-08-13 22:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-13 22:44 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 9.8 · severity → CRITICAL
  35. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-08-13 11:29 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-08-13 11:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-08-10 13:24 UTCNVD update
  39. 2026-08-10 12:21 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-08-10 12:17 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-68136?
CVE-2026-68136 is a critical vulnerability published on August 10, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: gro: fix double aggregation of flush-marked skbs Commit 0ab03f353d36 ("net-gro: Fix GRO flush when receiving a GSO packet.") added a flush check to skbgroreceive(), but skbgroreceive_list() lacks the same validation. As a…
When was CVE-2026-68136 disclosed?
CVE-2026-68136 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 10, 2026, with the most recent update on August 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-68136 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-68136 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 59.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-68136?
CVE-2026-68136 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-68136?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-68136, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-68136

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-68136?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.