CVE-2026-67211

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-11. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cisa-adp, epss, ghsa
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

OOM Denial of Service via Unbounded Map Pre-Sizing in Apache OpenNLP SymSpellModelSerializer

Versions Affected:

  • 3.0.0-M4
  • 3.0.0-M5

(The opennlp-spellcheck extension was introduced in 3.0.0-M4. Releases 1.x and 2.x do not contain the affected code.)

Description:

The SymSpellModelSerializer.create() method reads two 32-bit signed integer count fields (unigramCount and bigramCount) from a binary SymSpell model stream and passes each value directly to LinkedHashMap.newLinkedHashMap() after validating only that it is non-negative. No upper bound is applied, so the count is fully attacker-controlled when the model file originates from an untrusted source.

A crafted .bin model file in which either count field is set to Integer.MAX_VALUE (or any value large enough to exhaust the available heap) causes the map to be pre-sized to a capacity of 2^30 entries. The oversized backing array is allocated on the first put() into that map, requesting 4–8 GB depending on whether compressed oops are in effect, and the load fails with an OutOfMemoryError. Because the count fields sit immediately after a fixed-size header (magic, format version, three UTF strings, the configuration fields, and the edit-distance identifier) the attacker pays no meaningful size cost to weaponize a payload: a file of well under 100 bytes plus a single real entry is sufficient to crash a JVM that loads it.

Any code path that deserializes a SymSpell model is affected, including SymSpellModels.deserialize(InputStream), SymSpellModels.fromBytes(byte[]), classpath model loading via SymSpellModelResolver.resolveByLanguage(String), the CorrectTextTool command-line tool, and model-archive loading through the registered ArtifactSerializer. The opennlp-spellcheck extension ships in the official OpenNLP binary distribution.

The practical impact is denial of service against processes that load SymSpell model files from untrusted or semi-trusted origins.

Mitigation:

  • 3.x users should upgrade to 3.0.0-M6.

Note: The fix applies an upper bound to both count fields, checked before the map is pre-sized; counts that are negative or exceed the bound cause an IOException to be thrown and the read to fail fast with no large allocation. The bound is the existing AbstractModelReader.MAX_ENTRIES limit introduced earlie, which the current change promotes to public visibility so that serializers implementing their own binary format can share it. The default bound is 10,000,000, which is well above the entry counts of legitimate SymSpell dictionaries but far below any value that would threaten heap exhaustion. Deployments that legitimately need to load larger dictionaries can raise the limit at JVM startup by setting the OPENNLP_MAX_ENTRIES system property to the desired positive integer (e.g. -DOPENNLP_MAX_ENTRIES=50000000); invalid or non-positive values fall back to the default. Note that this property is shared with the model-reader limit and raising it relaxes both.

Users who cannot upgrade immediately should treat all SymSpell .bin model files as untrusted input unless their provenance is verified, and should avoid loading models supplied by end users or fetched from third-party repositories without integrity checks.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5(high)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity75% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
40%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 11, 2026

Last Modified

September 16, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Sep 14, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-67211(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 22× in last 7d / 27× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-09-19 12:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-09-19 00:38 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-19 00:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-18 12:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-18 01:17 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-18 01:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-17 13:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-17 01:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-16 14:16 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-09-16 14:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-16 06:23 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-16 06:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-15 18:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-15 07:03 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-15 07:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-14 19:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-14 18:55 UTCEG score recompute 7.50
  21. 2026-09-14 18:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-14 18:54 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.5 · severity → HIGH
  23. 2026-09-11 21:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-11 18:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-11 18:34 UTCNVD update
Show 2 more
  1. 2026-09-11 17:54 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-11 17:53 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-67211?
CVE-2026-67211 is a high vulnerability published on September 11, 2026. OOM Denial of Service via Unbounded Map Pre-Sizing in Apache OpenNLP SymSpellModelSerializer Versions Affected: 3.0.0-M4 3.0.0-M5 (The opennlp-spellcheck extension was introduced in 3.0.0-M4. Releases 1.x and 2.x do not contain the affected code.) Description: The SymSpellModelSerializer.create()…
When was CVE-2026-67211 disclosed?
CVE-2026-67211 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 11, 2026, with the most recent update on September 16, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-67211 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-67211 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 60.3% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-67211?
CVE-2026-67211 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-67211?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-67211, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-67211

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-67211?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.