CVE-2026-66906

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.19.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-08-24. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 9.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory
9.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.8%CVSS: 9.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Relative path traversal vulnerability in Apache Camel Azure Storage Blob component.

This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.9, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.4, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.0.

The camel-azure-storage-blob component can download an Azure Storage blob to the local filesystem through its downloadBlobToFile operation, writing into the directory named by the fileDir endpoint option, which is documented as usable from both the producer and the consumer. BlobOperations.downloadBlobToFile built the local target by joining fileDir with the remote blob name exactly as the Azure SDK reported it (new File(fileDir, client.getBlobName())) and passed the result straight to the SDK download call, with no lexical normalization and no check that the resolved location stayed inside fileDir. The blob name is not route-controlled data: the consumer enumerates the container in BlobConsumer.createBatchExchangesFromContainer, which lists blobs and creates one exchange per entry from BlobItem.getName() verbatim, applying no name filtering by default. A blob name containing parent-directory segments therefore resolved to a location outside the configured fileDir, letting anyone able to influence the names present in the consumed container cause Camel to create or overwrite a file at a location of their choosing, with the privileges of the Camel process. Depending on what the process can write to, overwriting a file outside the download directory can escalate beyond the loss of integrity of that file. Azure Storage blob containers use a flat namespace in which the blob name is an opaque key, so a name carrying such segments is stored and listed as given. The fileDir option is an ordinary common-group configuration parameter and carries no security marker, so nothing signalled to users that its value was not being enforced as a containment boundary. Camel's other file-download consumers - camel-file, camel-ftp, camel-smb, camel-mina-sftp and camel-azure-files - already constrained their local downloads to the configured directory using a path-segment boundary check; the camel-azure-storage-blob download path was not covered by that work.

Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.22.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.9. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.4. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, constrain the names the consumer will act on using the regex endpoint option, which is applied to each listed blob name as a full-string match, so that only simple single-segment names are accepted and any name carrying a path separator or a parent-directory segment is filtered out before an exchange is created; the prefix option can additionally narrow the listing server-side, noting that when both are set regex takes priority and prefix is ignored. Alternatively, avoid the downloadBlobToFile operation on untrusted containers and write the payload from the route under a file name the route itself controls, rather than one taken from the remote listing. As defence in depth, treat the blob names in any externally writable container as untrusted input and do not derive local filesystem paths from them.

CVSS v3
9.1
EG Score
9.1CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
56
EG Risk 56/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity91% × 45%
The EG Score, 9.1 of 10.
Exploitation0.8% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.8%
EPSS %ILE
54th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 24, 2026

Last Modified

October 12, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Sep 15, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

oss-security - CVE-2026-66906: Apache Camel: Camel-Azure-Storage-Blob: the downloadBlobToFile operation built the local download target from the remote blob name without constraining it to the configured fileDir

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/08/24/10
Web page

Apache Camel Security Advisory - CVE-2026-66906 - Apache Camel

https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-66906.html

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-66906(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
org.apache.camel:camel-azure-storage-blob4.19.0, 4.20.0, 4.21.0
  • 4.0.0 up to 4.14.9: fixed in 4.14.9
  • 4.15.0 up to 4.18.4: fixed in 4.18.4
  • 4.19.0 up to 4.22.0: fixed in 4.22.0
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 52× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 114 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 14 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 15:25 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-11 19:31 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 16:46 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 14:07 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  7. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 12:38 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  10. 2026-10-09 04:52 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  12. 2026-10-08 03:57 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  14. 2026-10-06 16:40 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  16. 2026-10-05 18:24 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  18. 2026-10-05 01:27 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  20. 2026-10-03 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  22. 2026-10-02 19:50 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  24. 2026-10-01 21:03 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-30 20:18 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  3. 2026-09-30 07:11 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-28 21:32 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-28 16:26 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  7. 2026-09-27 14:32 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  9. 2026-09-27 00:37 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  11. 2026-09-24 18:53 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-23 20:48 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  14. 2026-09-22 19:29 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-21 23:48 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-09-20 21:59 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  18. 2026-09-19 16:04 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-18 22:52 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  21. 2026-09-17 21:12 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-16 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  24. 2026-09-16 05:34 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  26. 2026-09-15 04:01 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-09-13 17:56 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-12 16:36 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-11 15:13 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  31. 2026-09-11 10:59 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  33. 2026-09-10 13:17 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-09 01:30 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  36. 2026-09-07 19:34 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  38. 2026-09-06 15:22 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  40. 2026-09-05 18:14 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  42. 2026-09-04 16:16 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-09-04 07:48 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  45. 2026-09-02 17:11 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  47. 2026-09-01 15:05 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  49. 2026-09-01 06:28 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  51. 2026-08-30 23:05 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  53. 2026-08-30 02:00 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  55. 2026-08-29 00:26 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  57. 2026-08-28 18:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x37-89hj-2j95 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  58. 2026-08-28 13:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x37-89hj-2j95 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  59. 2026-08-28 09:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x37-89hj-2j95 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  60. 2026-08-28 05:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x37-89hj-2j95 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  61. 2026-08-28 00:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x37-89hj-2j95 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  62. 2026-08-27 20:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x37-89hj-2j95 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  63. 2026-08-27 18:28 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-08-27 18:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x37-89hj-2j95 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  65. 2026-08-27 14:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x37-89hj-2j95 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  66. 2026-08-27 09:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x37-89hj-2j95 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  67. 2026-08-27 05:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x37-89hj-2j95 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  68. 2026-08-27 01:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x37-89hj-2j95 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  69. 2026-08-26 21:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x37-89hj-2j95 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  70. 2026-08-26 17:00 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-08-26 16:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x37-89hj-2j95 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  72. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  73. 2026-08-26 13:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x37-89hj-2j95 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  74. 2026-08-26 09:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x37-89hj-2j95 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  75. 2026-08-26 05:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x37-89hj-2j95 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-66906?
CVE-2026-66906 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 24, 2026. Relative path traversal vulnerability in Apache Camel Azure Storage Blob component. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.9, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.4, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.0. The camel-azure-storage-blob component can download an Azure Storage blob to the local filesystem…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-66906 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-66906 was published on August 24, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 12, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-66906 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-66906 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.8% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (54th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-66906?
CVE-2026-66906 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.1 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-66906?
A fix for CVE-2026-66906 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-66906 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-66906

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-66906?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.