CVE-2026-64594

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scoredTrending — 4 sources updated this week
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS v2: Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

usb: gadget: f_fs: initialize reset_work at allocation time

ffs_fs_kill_sb() unconditionally calls cancel_work_sync() on ffs->reset_work when a functionfs instance is unmounted:

ffs_data_reset(ffs); cancel_work_sync(&ffs->reset_work);

However ffs->reset_work is only ever initialized via INIT_WORK() in ffs_func_set_alt() and ffs_func_disable(), and only on the FFS_DEACTIVATED path. That state is reached solely by ffs_data_closed() when the instance is mounted with the "no_disconnect" option, so for the common case (no "no_disconnect", or mounted and unmounted without ever being deactivated) reset_work is never initialized.

ffs_data_new() allocates the ffs_data with kzalloc_obj() and does not initialize reset_work, and ffs_data_reset()/ffs_data_clear() do not touch it either, so reset_work.func is left NULL. cancel_work_sync() on such a work then trips the WARN_ON(!work->func) guard in __flush_work():

WARNING: kernel/workqueue.c:4301 at __flush_work+0x330/0x360, CPU#3: umount Call trace: __flush_work cancel_work_sync ffs_fs_kill_sb [usb_f_fs] deactivate_locked_super deactivate_super cleanup_mnt __cleanup_mnt task_work_run exit_to_user_mode_loop el0_svc

On older kernels cancel_work_sync() on a zero-initialized work struct was a silent no-op, which hid the missing initialization.

Initialize reset_work once in ffs_data_new() so it is always valid for the lifetime of the ffs_data, and drop the now-redundant INIT_WORK() calls from the two deactivation paths.

CVSS v3
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
EG Risk
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
6%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 6, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64594(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (55 versions)6.1.180-1
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (55 versions)5.10.262-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (31 versions)6.12.100-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (156 versions)7.1.4-1

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 22× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-20 03:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-17 05:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-17 05:25 UTCNVD update
  7. 2026-08-17 05:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-17 05:05 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  9. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-15 00:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-12 03:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-09 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-09 05:50 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-09 05:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-06 08:21 UTCNVD update
  21. 2026-08-06 07:25 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-06 07:25 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-64594?
CVE-2026-64594 is a publicly disclosed vulnerability published on August 6, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usb: gadget: ffs: initialize resetwork at allocation time ffsfskillsb() unconditionally calls cancelwork_sync() on ffs->reset_work when a functionfs instance is unmounted: ffsdatareset(ffs); cancelworksync(&ffs->reset_work);…
When was CVE-2026-64594 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64594 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 6, 2026, with the most recent update on August 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64594 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64594 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 93.9% of all scored CVEs.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64594?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64594, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64594

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64594?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.