In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iommu/vt-d: Avoid WARNING in sva unbind path
The Intel IOMMU driver allows SVA on devices even if they do not support
PCI/PRI. Commit 39c20c4e83b9 ("iommu/vt-d: Only handle IOPF for SVA when
PRI is supported") modified the SVA bind path to allow this configuration
by skipping IOPF enablement when PRI is missing. However, it failed to
update the unbind path.
This creates an imbalance: the unbind path attempts to disable IOPF for
a device that never had it enabled, triggering a WARNING in
intel_iommu_disable_iopf():
WARNING: drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c:3475 at intel_iommu_disable_iopf+0x4f/0x90d
Call Trace:
blocking_domain_set_dev_pasid+0x50/0x70
iommu_detach_device_pasid+0x89/0xc0
iommu_sva_unbind_device+0x73/0x150
xe_vm_close_and_put+0x4d2/0x1200 [xe]
Fix this by bypassing IOPF operations for SVA domains on non-PRI hardware
in both the bind and unbind paths.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
- EG Severity
- Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the BOD 26-04 block below.
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it