CVE-2026-64590

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scored
—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

dma-buf/udmabuf: skip redundant cpu sync to fix cacheline EEXIST warning

When CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG_SG is enabled, importing a udmabuf into a DRM driver (e.g. amdgpu for video playback in GNOME Videos / Showtime) triggers a spurious warning:

DMA-API: amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: cacheline tracking EEXIST, \ overlapping mappings aren't supported WARNING: kernel/dma/debug.c:619 at add_dma_entry+0x473/0x5f0

The call chain is:

amdgpu_cs_ioctl -> amdgpu_ttm_backend_bind -> dma_buf_map_attachment -> [udmabuf] map_udmabuf -> get_sg_table -> dma_map_sgtable(dev, sg, direction, 0) // attrs=0 -> debug_dma_map_sg -> add_dma_entry -> EEXIST

This happens because udmabuf builds a per-page scatter-gather list via sg_set_folio(). When begin_cpu_udmabuf() has already created an sg table mapped for the misc device, and an importer such as amdgpu maps the same pages for its own device via map_udmabuf(), the DMA debug infrastructure sees two active mappings whose physical addresses share cacheline boundaries and warns about the overlap.

The DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC flag suppresses this check in add_dma_entry() because it signals that no CPU cache maintenance is performed at map/unmap time, making the cacheline overlap harmless.

All other major dma-buf exporters already pass this flag:

  • drm_gem_map_dma_buf() passes DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC
  • amdgpu_dma_buf_map() passes DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC

The CPU sync at map/unmap time is also redundant for udmabuf: begin_cpu_udmabuf() and end_cpu_udmabuf() already perform explicit cache synchronization via dma_sync_sgtable_for_cpu/device() when CPU access is requested through the dma-buf interface.

Pass DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC to dma_map_sgtable() and dma_unmap_sgtable() in udmabuf to suppress the spurious warning and skip the redundant sync.

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
5th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

EG Severity
Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the BOD 26-04 block below.

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 6, 2026

Last Modified

August 23, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64590(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(11)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (56 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.187-1: fixed in 6.1.187-1
—
linux-6.12—
  • every version up to 6.12.100-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.100-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (500 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.95-1~bpo12+1 (30 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.96-1: fixed in 6.12.96-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (159 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.4-1: fixed in 7.1.4-1
—

Additional Vendor Advisories

(11)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 111 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 11 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  2. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  3. 2026-10-18 03:22 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  5. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  6. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  7. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  8. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  9. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  10. 2026-10-12 15:47 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 19:32 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 16:47 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 14:08 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  15. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  16. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  17. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  18. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  19. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  20. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  21. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  22. 2026-10-04 05:55 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-04 05:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99r-j84h-cmw8
  24. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  25. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  2. 2026-10-01 01:49 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-01 01:49 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-01 01:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99r-j84h-cmw8
  5. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  6. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  7. 2026-09-27 17:36 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-27 17:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99r-j84h-cmw8
  9. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  10. 2026-09-23 23:40 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-09-23 23:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99r-j84h-cmw8
  12. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  13. 2026-09-20 20:44 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-09-20 20:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99r-j84h-cmw8
  15. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  16. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  17. 2026-09-17 15:19 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-17 15:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99r-j84h-cmw8
  19. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  20. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  21. 2026-09-14 11:56 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-09-14 11:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99r-j84h-cmw8
  23. 2026-09-11 09:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99r-j84h-cmw8
  24. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  25. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  26. 2026-09-08 07:44 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-09-08 07:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99r-j84h-cmw8
  28. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  29. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  30. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  31. 2026-09-05 03:41 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-09-05 03:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99r-j84h-cmw8
  33. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  34. 2026-09-01 23:17 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-09-01 23:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99r-j84h-cmw8
  36. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  37. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  38. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  39. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  40. 2026-08-29 21:12 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-29 21:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99r-j84h-cmw8
  42. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  43. 2026-08-26 15:29 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-26 15:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99r-j84h-cmw8
  45. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  46. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  47. 2026-08-23 13:21 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-23 13:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99r-j84h-cmw8
  49. 2026-08-23 13:19 UTCNVD update
  50. 2026-08-23 13:09 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-23 13:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99r-j84h-cmw8
  52. 2026-08-23 13:05 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  53. 2026-08-23 09:49 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-23 09:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99r-j84h-cmw8
  55. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  56. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  57. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  58. 2026-08-20 07:45 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-20 07:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99r-j84h-cmw8
  60. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  61. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  62. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  63. 2026-08-17 05:41 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-17 05:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99r-j84h-cmw8
  65. 2026-08-17 05:25 UTCNVD update
  66. 2026-08-17 05:13 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-17 05:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99r-j84h-cmw8
  68. 2026-08-17 05:05 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  69. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  70. 2026-08-15 14:36 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-15 14:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99r-j84h-cmw8
  72. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  73. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  74. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  75. 2026-08-12 12:31 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-64590?
CVE-2026-64590 is a vulnerability whose severity is not yet rated; its CVE record was published on August 6, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dma-buf/udmabuf: skip redundant cpu sync to fix cacheline EEXIST warning When CONFIGDMAAPIDEBUGSG is enabled, importing a udmabuf into a DRM driver (e.g. amdgpu for video playback in GNOME Videos / Showtime) triggers a spurious…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-64590 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-64590 was published on August 6, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 23, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-64590 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64590 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (5th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64590?
A fix for CVE-2026-64590 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-64590 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64590

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64590?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.