CVE-2026-64586

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-06. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

wifi: brcmfmac: drain bus_reset work on device removal

brcmf_fw_crashed() and the debugfs "reset" entry both schedule drvr->bus_reset, whose callback recovers drvr through container_of() and dereferences it. The removal path frees drvr (brcmf_free -> wiphy_free) without draining the work, so a bus_reset callback pending or running during removal can outlive drvr.

Cancellation cannot live in brcmf_detach() or brcmf_free(): the work callback reaches teardown through the bus .reset op (PCIe brcmf_pcie_reset -> brcmf_detach; SDIO brcmf_sdio_bus_reset -> brcmf_sdiod_remove -> brcmf_free), so cancelling there would wait for the running work and deadlock.

Add a per-bus mutex (bus_reset_lock) and route all arming through brcmf_bus_schedule_reset(), which under the lock skips when the bus is marked removing. Each bus remove entry calls brcmf_bus_cancel_reset_work(), which under the same lock sets removing and cancels the work. Holding the mutex across cancel_work_sync() makes the set-removing + drain step atomic. Every producer reaches the arming path from process context -- the PCIe firmware-halt notification runs in the threaded IRQ handler (brcmf_pcie_isr_thread) and the SDIO hostmail path runs from the data workqueue -- so the mutex is taken only in sleepable contexts. Where applicable the remove entry first stops the firmware-crash producer: on PCIe mask the mailbox and synchronize_irq; on SDIO unregister the bus interrupt and cancel the data worker, which also reports firmware halts through brcmf_fw_crashed(). The mutex is initialized at bus allocation. The SDIO suspend power-off path frees drvr through the same brcmf_sdiod_remove() and takes the same lock; resume re-allows the work only on a successful re-probe.

Also guard brcmf_fw_crashed() against a NULL bus_if/drvr: it can fire before brcmf_attach() wires up drvr, and it dereferences drvr (bphy_err/brcmf_dev_coredump) before reaching the arming gate.

The bus_reset work is shared across buses, so the drain is applied to every remove path: PCIe (the .reset op introduced by the Fixes commit), SDIO (arms the same work through brcmf_fw_crashed()), and USB (via the debugfs "reset" entry). cancel_work_sync() drains a running or pending bus_reset work item before removal frees drvr, and patch 1/2 makes the scratch-buffer release safe when reset teardown has already released those DMA buffers.

This patch fixes the lifetime of the bus_reset work item itself. It does not attempt to address the separate, pre-existing lifetime of the asynchronous firmware completion started by the PCIe reset path. That callback needs its own lifetime/ownership protocol and is being tracked separately.

This issue was found by an in-house static analysis tool.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
15th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-19). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 6, 2026

Last Modified

October 19, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 8, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

wifi: brcmfmac: drain bus_reset work on device removal - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/43b25879f004c98defa2776bedc6ca4763c51945
Web page

wifi: brcmfmac: drain bus_reset work on device removal - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/177a25be1195f8bdc6160ba5f1a5699f7041c985

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64586(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(7)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (56 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.187-1: fixed in 6.1.187-1
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.107-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (500 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (33 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.105-1: fixed in 6.12.105-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (161 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.6-1: fixed in 7.1.6-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(7)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 23× in last 7d / 98× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 281 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 181 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-19 21:42 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-19 21:42 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-19 21:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rg4-8h2h-x94w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  4. 2026-10-19 20:54 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-19 20:54 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-19 20:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rg4-8h2h-x94w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  7. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  8. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  9. 2026-10-18 03:22 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  11. 2026-10-16 17:35 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-16 17:35 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-16 17:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rg4-8h2h-x94w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  14. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  15. 2026-10-16 16:09 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-16 16:09 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-16 16:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rg4-8h2h-x94w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  18. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  19. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  20. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  21. 2026-10-13 11:39 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-13 11:39 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-13 11:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rg4-8h2h-x94w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  24. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  25. 2026-10-12 15:47 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-11 19:32 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-11 16:47 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-11 14:08 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  5. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  6. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  7. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  8. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  9. 2026-10-06 23:34 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-06 23:34 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-06 23:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rg4-8h2h-x94w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  12. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  13. 2026-10-05 19:31 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-05 19:31 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-05 19:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rg4-8h2h-x94w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  16. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  17. 2026-10-04 23:28 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-04 23:28 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-04 23:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rg4-8h2h-x94w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  20. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  21. 2026-10-04 05:55 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-04 05:55 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-04 05:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rg4-8h2h-x94w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  24. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  25. 2026-10-03 01:06 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-10-03 01:06 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-03 01:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rg4-8h2h-x94w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  28. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  29. 2026-10-02 09:48 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-10-02 09:48 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-02 09:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rg4-8h2h-x94w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  32. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  33. 2026-10-01 12:40 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-01 12:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rg4-8h2h-x94w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  35. 2026-10-01 01:49 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-10-01 01:49 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-01 01:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rg4-8h2h-x94w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  38. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  39. 2026-09-29 06:03 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-29 06:03 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-09-29 06:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rg4-8h2h-x94w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  42. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  43. 2026-09-28 04:27 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-09-28 04:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rg4-8h2h-x94w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  45. 2026-09-27 17:37 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-27 17:37 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-09-27 17:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rg4-8h2h-x94w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  48. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  49. 2026-09-25 04:27 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-09-25 04:27 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-09-25 04:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rg4-8h2h-x94w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  52. 2026-09-24 08:33 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-09-24 08:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rg4-8h2h-x94w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  54. 2026-09-23 21:42 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-09-23 21:42 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-09-23 21:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rg4-8h2h-x94w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  57. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  58. 2026-09-23 10:52 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-09-23 10:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rg4-8h2h-x94w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  60. 2026-09-22 23:57 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-09-22 23:57 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-09-22 23:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rg4-8h2h-x94w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  63. 2026-09-22 12:56 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-09-22 12:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rg4-8h2h-x94w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  65. 2026-09-22 01:19 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-09-22 01:19 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-09-22 01:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rg4-8h2h-x94w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  68. 2026-09-21 13:00 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-09-21 13:00 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-09-21 13:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rg4-8h2h-x94w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  71. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  72. 2026-09-20 10:59 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-09-20 10:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rg4-8h2h-x94w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  74. 2026-09-20 00:04 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-09-20 00:04 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64586?
CVE-2026-64586 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 6, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: brcmfmac: drain bus_reset work on device removal brcmffwcrashed() and the debugfs "reset" entry both schedule drvr->busreset, whose callback recovers drvr through containerof() and dereferences it. The removal path frees drvr…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-64586 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-64586 was published on August 6, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-64586 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64586 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (15th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64586?
CVE-2026-64586 has a CVSS base score of 8.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64586?
A fix for CVE-2026-64586 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-64586 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64586

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64586?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.