CVE-2026-64567

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-05. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: reject free space cache with more entries than pages

When loading a v1 free space cache, __load_free_space_cache() takes num_entries and num_bitmaps straight from the on-disk btrfs_free_space_header. That header is stored in the tree_root under a key with type 0, which the tree-checker has no case for, so neither count is validated before the load trusts it.

The load loops num_entries times and maps the next page whenever the current one runs out, going through io_ctl_check_crc() -> io_ctl_map_page(), which does io_ctl->pages[io_ctl->index++]. But pages[] is allocated in io_ctl_init() from the cache inode's i_size, not from num_entries:

num_pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(i_size_read(inode), PAGE_SIZE); io_ctl->pages = kcalloc(num_pages, sizeof(struct page *), GFP_NOFS);

So if num_entries claims more records than the pages can hold, io_ctl->index runs off the end of pages[]. The write side never hits this because io_ctl_add_entry() and io_ctl_add_bitmap() both stop once io_ctl->index >= io_ctl->num_pages; the read side just never had the same check.

To trigger it, take a clean cache (num_entries = here), set num_entries in the header to 0x10000, and fix up the leaf checksum so it still passes the tree-checker. The cache inode has i_size = 65536, so num_pages is 16 and pages[] is a 16-pointer (kmalloc-128) array. The load now tries to read 65536 entries, io_ctl->index walks up to 16, and pages[16] is read past the array:

BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in io_ctl_check_crc (fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:420 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:565) Read of size 8 at addr ffff88800c833a80 by task kworker/u8:3/58 io_ctl_check_crc (fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:420 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:565) __load_free_space_cache (fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:655 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:820) load_free_space_cache (fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:1017) caching_thread (fs/btrfs/block-group.c:880) btrfs_work_helper (fs/btrfs/async-thread.c:312) process_one_work worker_thread kthread ret_from_fork

free-space-cache.c:420 is io_ctl_map_page(), inlined into io_ctl_check_crc() at line 565, which is why that is the frame KASAN names. The out-of-bounds slot is then treated as a struct page and handed to crc32c(), so the bad read turns into a GP fault.

Add the missing check to io_ctl_check_crc(), which is where both the entry loop and the bitmap loop end up. When num_entries is too large the load now fails like any corrupt cache: __load_free_space_cache() drops it and rebuilds the free space from the extent tree, so a valid cache is never rejected.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(high)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 5, 2026

Last Modified

August 19, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Aug 8, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

btrfs: reject free space cache with more entries than pages - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f9fef131fa3f59b857217f522fa5ea430d1b707c
generic

btrfs: reject free space cache with more entries than pages - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a2d8d5647ed854e38f941741aea45b9eb15a6350
generic

btrfs: reject free space cache with more entries than pages - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5e1b2ca6b34939e70fb0785e8222b53cf060016f
generic

btrfs: reject free space cache with more entries than pages - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/404a0b986e0b6e79738fdf1f0ebbbc43b9acd2a2
generic

btrfs: reject free space cache with more entries than pages - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/33878ba25e2638bc0c61623d7a05c9ca2b74c039

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64567(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (500 versions)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (338 versions)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (32 versions)6.12.101-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (158 versions)7.1.6-1

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 49× in last 7d / 88× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-21 02:35 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-21 02:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-20 15:31 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-20 15:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-20 04:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-19 17:27 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-19 17:27 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-19 17:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-19 16:56 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-19 16:56 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-19 16:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-19 14:03 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-19 14:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-19 03:01 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-19 03:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-18 15:46 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-18 15:46 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-18 15:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-18 03:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-17 16:42 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-17 16:42 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-17 16:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 63 more
  1. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-17 05:42 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-17 05:42 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-17 05:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-17 05:14 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-17 05:14 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-08-17 05:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-16 21:44 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-16 21:44 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-16 21:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-16 10:43 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-16 10:43 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-16 10:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-15 23:44 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-15 23:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-15 12:44 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-15 12:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-15 01:40 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-15 01:40 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-08-15 01:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-14 14:40 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-14 14:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-14 03:40 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-08-14 03:40 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-08-14 03:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-08-13 16:40 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-08-13 16:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-08-13 05:17 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-13 05:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-12 18:17 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-08-12 18:17 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-08-12 18:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-08-12 07:17 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-12 07:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-11 20:16 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-11 20:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-11 09:16 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-08-11 09:16 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-08-11 09:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-08-10 22:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-10 11:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-08-10 00:16 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-08-10 00:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-09 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-08-09 13:16 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-09 13:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-08-09 02:17 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-09 02:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-08-08 15:17 UTCEG score recompute 7.80
  56. 2026-08-08 15:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-08-08 15:16 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  58. 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-08-05 08:20 UTCNVD update
  62. 2026-08-05 08:13 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-05 08:10 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64567?
CVE-2026-64567 is a high vulnerability published on August 5, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: reject free space cache with more entries than pages When loading a v1 free space cache, loadfreespace_cache() takes numentries and numbitmaps straight from the on-disk btrfsfreespaceheader. That header is stored in the…
When was CVE-2026-64567 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64567 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 5, 2026, with the most recent update on August 19, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64567 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64567 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.8% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64567?
CVE-2026-64567 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64567?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64567, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64567

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64567?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.