CVE-2026-64567

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-05. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: reject free space cache with more entries than pages

When loading a v1 free space cache, __load_free_space_cache() takes num_entries and num_bitmaps straight from the on-disk btrfs_free_space_header. That header is stored in the tree_root under a key with type 0, which the tree-checker has no case for, so neither count is validated before the load trusts it.

The load loops num_entries times and maps the next page whenever the current one runs out, going through io_ctl_check_crc() -> io_ctl_map_page(), which does io_ctl->pages[io_ctl->index++]. But pages[] is allocated in io_ctl_init() from the cache inode's i_size, not from num_entries:

num_pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(i_size_read(inode), PAGE_SIZE); io_ctl->pages = kcalloc(num_pages, sizeof(struct page *), GFP_NOFS);

So if num_entries claims more records than the pages can hold, io_ctl->index runs off the end of pages[]. The write side never hits this because io_ctl_add_entry() and io_ctl_add_bitmap() both stop once io_ctl->index >= io_ctl->num_pages; the read side just never had the same check.

To trigger it, take a clean cache (num_entries = here), set num_entries in the header to 0x10000, and fix up the leaf checksum so it still passes the tree-checker. The cache inode has i_size = 65536, so num_pages is 16 and pages[] is a 16-pointer (kmalloc-128) array. The load now tries to read 65536 entries, io_ctl->index walks up to 16, and pages[16] is read past the array:

BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in io_ctl_check_crc (fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:420 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:565) Read of size 8 at addr ffff88800c833a80 by task kworker/u8:3/58 io_ctl_check_crc (fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:420 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:565) __load_free_space_cache (fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:655 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:820) load_free_space_cache (fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:1017) caching_thread (fs/btrfs/block-group.c:880) btrfs_work_helper (fs/btrfs/async-thread.c:312) process_one_work worker_thread kthread ret_from_fork

free-space-cache.c:420 is io_ctl_map_page(), inlined into io_ctl_check_crc() at line 565, which is why that is the frame KASAN names. The out-of-bounds slot is then treated as a struct page and handed to crc32c(), so the bad read turns into a GP fault.

Add the missing check to io_ctl_check_crc(), which is where both the entry loop and the bitmap loop end up. When num_entries is too large the load now fails like any corrupt cache: __load_free_space_cache() drops it and rebuilds the free space from the extent tree, so a valid cache is never rejected.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
35
EG Risk 35/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
1st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-19). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 5, 2026

Last Modified

October 19, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Aug 8, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

btrfs: reject free space cache with more entries than pages - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f9fef131fa3f59b857217f522fa5ea430d1b707c
Web page

btrfs: reject free space cache with more entries than pages - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a2d8d5647ed854e38f941741aea45b9eb15a6350
Web page

btrfs: reject free space cache with more entries than pages - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5e1b2ca6b34939e70fb0785e8222b53cf060016f
Web page

btrfs: reject free space cache with more entries than pages - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/404a0b986e0b6e79738fdf1f0ebbbc43b9acd2a2
Web page

btrfs: reject free space cache with more entries than pages - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/33878ba25e2638bc0c61623d7a05c9ca2b74c039

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64567(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(15)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (56 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.187-1: fixed in 6.1.187-1
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.101-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.101-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (500 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (32 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.101-1: fixed in 6.12.101-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (161 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.6-1: fixed in 7.1.6-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(15)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 22× in last 7d / 93× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 326 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 226 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-19 21:42 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-19 21:42 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-19 21:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  4. 2026-10-19 20:55 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-19 20:55 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-19 20:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  7. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  8. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  9. 2026-10-18 03:22 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  11. 2026-10-16 17:36 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-16 17:36 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-16 17:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  14. 2026-10-16 16:10 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-16 16:10 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-16 16:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  17. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  18. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  19. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  20. 2026-10-13 11:39 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-13 11:39 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-13 11:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  23. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  24. 2026-10-12 15:47 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-11 19:32 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-11 16:47 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-11 14:09 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  4. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  5. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  6. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  7. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  8. 2026-10-06 23:39 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-06 23:39 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-06 23:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  11. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  12. 2026-10-05 19:37 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-05 19:37 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-05 19:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  15. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  16. 2026-10-04 23:36 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-04 23:36 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-04 23:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  19. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  20. 2026-10-04 06:03 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-04 06:03 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-04 06:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  23. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  24. 2026-10-03 01:12 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-03 01:12 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-03 01:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  27. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  28. 2026-10-02 10:00 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-02 10:00 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-02 10:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  31. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  32. 2026-10-01 13:21 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-01 13:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  34. 2026-10-01 02:21 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-10-01 02:21 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-01 02:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  37. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  38. 2026-09-29 06:20 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-29 06:20 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-09-29 06:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  41. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  42. 2026-09-28 05:00 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-09-28 05:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  44. 2026-09-27 17:45 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-27 17:45 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-27 17:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  47. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  48. 2026-09-25 04:35 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-09-25 04:35 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-09-25 04:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  51. 2026-09-24 09:02 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-09-24 09:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  53. 2026-09-23 22:02 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-09-23 22:02 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-09-23 22:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  56. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  57. 2026-09-23 11:02 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-09-23 11:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  59. 2026-09-23 00:01 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-09-23 00:01 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-09-23 00:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  62. 2026-09-22 13:01 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-09-22 13:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  64. 2026-09-22 01:51 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-09-22 01:51 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-09-22 01:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  67. 2026-09-20 20:49 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-09-20 20:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  69. 2026-09-20 01:54 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-09-20 01:54 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-09-20 01:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  72. 2026-09-19 14:54 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-09-19 14:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-834p-x3hc-j46g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  74. 2026-09-19 03:28 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-09-19 03:28 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64567?
CVE-2026-64567 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 5, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: reject free space cache with more entries than pages When loading a v1 free space cache, loadfreespace_cache() takes numentries and numbitmaps straight from the on-disk btrfsfreespaceheader. That header is stored in the…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-64567 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-64567 was published on August 5, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-64567 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64567 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (1st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64567?
CVE-2026-64567 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64567?
A fix for CVE-2026-64567 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-64567 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64567

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64567?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.