CVE-2026-64513

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scoredTrending — 3 sources updated this week
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS v2: Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: x86: Unconditionally recompute CR8 intercept on PPR update

The TPR_THRESHOLD field in the VMCS is used by VMX to induce VM exits when the guest's virtual TPR falls under the specified threshold, allowing KVM to inject previously masked interrupts.

KVM handles these VM exits in handle_tpr_below_threshold(). Commit eb90f3417a0c ("KVM: vmx: speed up TPR below threshold vmexits") optimized this function by calling apic_update_ppr() instead of raising KVM_REQ_EVENT. apic_update_ppr() then raises KVM_REQ_EVENT if there is a pending, deliverable interrupt.

However, if there are no new interrupts pending, apic_update_ppr() does not issue the request. Thus, kvm_lapic_update_cr8_intercept() and vmx_update_cr8_intercept() are not called before VM entry, which results in a high, stale TPR_THRESHOLD. This is problematic due to the following sentence in 28.2.1.1 "VM-Execution Control Fields" in the SDM:

The following check is performed if the “use TPR shadow” VM-execution control is 1 and the “virtualize APIC accesses” and “virtual-interrupt delivery” VM-execution controls are both 0: the value of bits 3:0 of the TPR threshold VM-execution control field should not be greater than the value of bits 7:4 of VTPR.

This error condition is typically not observed when KVM runs on a bare metal system because modern processors support APICv, which enables virtual-interrupt delivery, and which KVM uses when possible. This causes the processor to no longer generate TPR-below-threshold exits and to no longer check TPR_THRESHOLD on entry. However, when running on older platforms, or under nested virtualization on a hypervisor that does not support virtual-interrupt delivery and enforces this check (like Hyper-V) this can cause a VM entry failure with hardware error 0x7, as seen in [1].

Call kvm_lapic_update_cr8_intercept() if apic_update_ppr() does not find a deliverable interrupt (and thus does not raise KVM_REQ_EVENT). Remove calls to kvm_lapic_update_cr8_intercept() on paths that end up in apic_update_ppr(), as they now become redundant. This ensures that any path that updates the guest's PPR also figures out if KVM needs to wait for a TPR change (using TPR_THRESHOLD on VMX or CR8 intercepts on SVM).

CVSS v3
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
EG Risk
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
7%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 25, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64513(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-26.04-edge (7.0.0-31.31) @ resolute2026-09-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-7.0 (7.0.0-1013.13) @ resolute2026-09-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-09-14ubuntu

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (500 versions)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (350 versions)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (174 versions)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (158 versions)7.1.4-1

All Vendor Advisories

(3)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 36× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-09-14 04:45 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-09-14 04:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-11 02:07 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-09-11 02:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-07 21:10 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-09-07 21:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-04 12:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-30 00:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-26 13:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-23 10:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 49 more
  1. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-20 08:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-17 05:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-17 05:25 UTCNVD update
  10. 2026-08-17 05:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-17 05:05 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  12. 2026-08-16 23:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-13 20:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-10 18:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-09 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-07 15:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-04 12:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-08-04 10:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-08-01 08:01 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-08-01 08:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-07-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-07-29 05:23 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-07-29 05:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-07-28 15:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-07-27 14:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-07-26 02:45 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-07-26 02:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-07-25 10:39 UTCNVD update
  48. 2026-07-25 09:22 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-07-25 09:21 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-64513?
CVE-2026-64513 is a publicly disclosed vulnerability published on July 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: x86: Unconditionally recompute CR8 intercept on PPR update The TPR_THRESHOLD field in the VMCS is used by VMX to induce VM exits when the guest's virtual TPR falls under the specified threshold, allowing KVM to inject…
When was CVE-2026-64513 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64513 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 25, 2026, with the most recent update on August 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64513 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64513 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 92.7% of all scored CVEs.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64513?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64513, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64513

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64513?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.