CVE-2026-64479

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scoredTrending — 5 sources updated this week
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS v2: Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ALSA: seq: Fix uninitialised heap leak in snd_seq_event_dup()

snd_seq_event_dup() copies an incoming event into a pool cell and, in the UMP-enabled build, clears the trailing cell->ump.raw.extra word that the memcpy() did not cover. The guard deciding whether to clear it compares the copied size against sizeof(cell->event):

memcpy(&cell->ump, event, size); if (size < sizeof(cell->event)) cell->ump.raw.extra = 0;

For a legacy (non-UMP) event, size == sizeof(struct snd_seq_event) == sizeof(cell->event), so the condition is false and the extra word keeps stale data. The cell pool is allocated with kvmalloc() (not zeroed) and cells are reused via a free list, so that word holds uninitialised heap or leftover event data.

When such a cell is delivered to a UMP client (client->midi_version > 0) that set SNDRV_SEQ_FILTER_NO_CONVERT -- so the legacy event reaches it unconverted -- snd_seq_read() reads it out as the larger struct snd_seq_ump_event and copies the stale word to user space, a 4-byte kernel heap infoleak to an unprivileged /dev/snd/seq client.

Compare against sizeof(cell->ump) instead, so the trailing word is zeroed for every event shorter than the UMP cell.

CVSS v3
EG Score
0.0(none)
EG Risk
0
EG Risk 0/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. It is distinct from the 0–10 EG Score, which measures severity.

EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
8%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 25, 2026

Last Modified

July 25, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64479(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 9× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-26 02:46 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-26 02:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-25 10:39 UTCNVD update
  8. 2026-07-25 09:26 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-07-25 09:21 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-64479?
CVE-2026-64479 is a publicly disclosed vulnerability published on July 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ALSA: seq: Fix uninitialised heap leak in sndseqevent_dup() sndseqevent_dup() copies an incoming event into a pool cell and, in the UMP-enabled build, clears the trailing cell->ump.raw.extra word that the memcpy() did not cover.…
When was CVE-2026-64479 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64479 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 25, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64479 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64479 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 92.1% of all scored CVEs.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64479?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64479, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-64479

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64479?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.