CVE-2026-64378

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-25. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

writeback: fix race between cgroup_writeback_umount() and inode_switch_wbs()

When a container exits, the following BUG_ON() is occasionally triggered:

================================================================== VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of sdb (ext4) ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/super.c:695! CPU: 3 PID: 6 Comm: containerd-shim Tainted: G OE K 6.6 #1 pstate: 63400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO +TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : generic_shutdown_super+0xf0/0x100 lr : generic_shutdown_super+0xf0/0x100 Call trace: generic_shutdown_super+0xf0/0x100 kill_block_super+0x20/0x48 ext4_kill_sb+0x28/0x60 deactivate_locked_super+0x54/0x130 deactivate_super+0x84/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0xa4/0x140 __cleanup_mnt+0x18/0x28 task_work_run+0x78/0xe0 do_notify_resume+0x204/0x240 ==================================================================

The root cause is a race between cgroup_writeback_umount() and inode_switch_wbs()/cleanup_offline_cgwb(). There is a window between inode_prepare_wbs_switch() returning true and the subsequent wb_queue_isw() call. Following is the process that triggers the issue:

CPU A (umount) | CPU B (writeback) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ inode_switch_wbs/cleanup_offline_cgwb atomic_inc(&isw_nr_in_flight) inode_prepare_wbs_switch -> passes SB_ACTIVE check __iget(inode) generic_shutdown_super sb->s_flags &= ~SB_ACTIVE cgroup_writeback_umount(sb) smp_mb() atomic_read(&isw_nr_in_flight) rcu_barrier() -> no pending RCU callbacks flush_workqueue(isw_wq) -> nothing queued, returns evict_inodes(sb) -> Inode skipped as isw still holds a ref. sop->put_super(sb) /* destroys percpu counters */ -> VFS: Busy inodes after unmount! wb_queue_isw() queue_work(isw_wq, ...) /* later in work function */ inode_switch_wbs_work_fn process_inode_switch_wbs iput() -> evict percpu_counter_dec() // UAF!

Fix this by extending the RCU read-side critical section in inode_switch_wbs() and cleanup_offline_cgwb() to cover from inode_prepare_wbs_switch() through wb_queue_isw(). Since there is no sleep in this window, rcu_read_lock() can be used. Then add a synchronize_rcu() in cgroup_writeback_umount() before the existing rcu_barrier(), so that all in-flight switchers that have passed the SB_ACTIVE check have completed queue_work() before flush_workqueue() is called.

The existing rcu_barrier() is intentionally retained so this fix can be backported unchanged to stable kernels (5.10.y, 6.6.y, ...) that still queue switches via queue_rcu_work(). It is a no-op on current mainline (since commit e1b849cfa6b6 ("writeback: Avoid contention on wb->list_lock when switching inodes")) and is removed in a follow-up patch.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 25, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Jul 27, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

writeback: fix race between cgroup_writeback_umount() and inode_switch_wbs() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cba38ec4cbd3a7b8b942a8d52531a05be8a9ff0d
generic

writeback: fix race between cgroup_writeback_umount() and inode_switch_wbs() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c923cc3cb5cd8945ceaf08252754110643446593
generic

writeback: fix race between cgroup_writeback_umount() and inode_switch_wbs() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/685fc15a410885b6d4dee64de0dce721b9428b12
generic

writeback: fix race between cgroup_writeback_umount() and inode_switch_wbs() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5c3265f3252b2ee50707adaaa3f9bd0df3df72de
generic

writeback: fix race between cgroup_writeback_umount() and inode_switch_wbs() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/53eeaf4d63068dbc7708b0c7adb20151c812feca
generic

writeback: fix race between cgroup_writeback_umount() and inode_switch_wbs() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c9c9648f77e4d14e50676bc51c2174ba9c8d361
generic

writeback: fix race between cgroup_writeback_umount() and inode_switch_wbs() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/087d5b8b501c570f84bf655164e6698c3ce146e0

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64378(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(6 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (55 versions)5.10.262-1
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.177-1~deb11u1 (22 versions)6.1.180-1~deb11u1
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (55 versions)6.1.180-1
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.95-1~bpo12+1 (30 versions)6.12.96-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (156 versions)7.1.4-1

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 30× in last 7d / 146× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 175 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-30 00:08 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-30 00:08 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-30 00:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-27 21:11 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-27 21:11 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-27 21:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-27 09:57 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-27 09:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-26 21:59 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-26 21:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-26 10:39 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-26 10:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-25 22:40 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-25 22:40 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-25 22:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-25 11:26 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-25 11:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-25 00:04 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-25 00:04 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-25 00:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-24 12:50 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-24 12:50 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-24 12:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-24 01:35 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-24 01:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-23 14:21 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-23 14:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-23 03:07 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-23 03:07 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-23 03:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-22 15:52 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-22 15:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-22 04:27 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-22 04:27 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-22 04:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-21 17:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-21 05:58 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-21 05:58 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-21 05:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-20 18:44 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-20 18:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-20 07:30 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-20 07:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-19 20:15 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-08-19 20:15 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-08-19 20:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-08-19 06:28 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-08-19 06:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-08-18 18:50 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-18 18:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-18 03:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-17 16:36 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-08-17 16:36 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-08-17 16:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-08-17 05:18 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-08-17 05:18 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-17 05:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-16 18:51 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-08-16 18:51 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-08-16 18:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-08-16 07:26 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-08-16 07:26 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-08-16 07:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-08-15 20:13 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-08-15 20:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-08-15 08:59 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-08-15 08:59 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-08-15 08:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-08-14 21:44 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-08-14 21:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-08-14 10:30 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-14 10:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-13 23:16 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-13 23:16 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-13 23:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-08-13 12:02 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-13 12:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-13 00:49 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-08-13 00:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-08-12 13:35 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-12 13:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-08-12 02:21 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-12 02:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-11 15:07 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-11 15:07 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-11 15:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-11 03:59 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-11 03:59 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64378?
CVE-2026-64378 is a high vulnerability published on July 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: writeback: fix race between cgroupwritebackumount() and inodeswitchwbs() When a container exits, the following BUG_ON() is occasionally triggered: ================================================================== VFS: Busy inodes…
When was CVE-2026-64378 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64378 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 25, 2026, with the most recent update on August 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64378 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64378 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.1% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64378?
CVE-2026-64378 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64378?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64378, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64378

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64378?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.