CVE-2026-64352

HIGHNVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-25. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Allow LPM map access from sleepable BPF programs

trie_lookup_elem() annotates its rcu_dereference_check() walks with only rcu_read_lock_bh_held(). Because rcu_dereference_check(p, c) resolves to "c || rcu_read_lock_held()", this passes for XDP/NAPI and classic RCU readers but fails for sleepable BPF programs, which enter via __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable() and hold only rcu_read_lock_trace().

trie_update_elem() and trie_delete_elem() have the same problem in a different form: they walk the trie with plain rcu_dereference(), which asserts rcu_read_lock_held() unconditionally. Both are reachable from sleepable BPF programs via the bpf_map_update_elem / bpf_map_delete_elem helpers, and from the syscall path under classic rcu_read_lock(). In the writer paths the trie is actually protected by trie->lock (an rqspinlock taken across the walk); we never relied on the RCU read-side lock to keep nodes alive there.

A sleepable LSM hook that ends up touching an LPM trie therefore triggers lockdep on debug kernels:

============================= WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 7.1.0-... Tainted: G E ----------------------------- kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:249 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! 1 lock held by net_tests/540: #0: (rcu_tasks_trace_srcu_struct){....}-{0:0}, at: __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable+0x26/0x280 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl lockdep_rcu_suspicious trie_lookup_elem bpf_prog_..._enforce_security_socket_connect bpf_trampoline_... security_socket_connect __sys_connect do_syscall_64

This is lockdep-only -- no UAF, since Tasks Trace RCU does serialize against the trie's reclaim path -- but it spams the console once per distinct callsite on every debug kernel running a sleepable BPF LSM that touches an LPM trie, which is increasingly common.

For the lookup path, switch the rcu_dereference_check() annotation from rcu_read_lock_bh_held() to bpf_rcu_lock_held(), which accepts all three contexts (classic, BH, Tasks Trace). Other map types already follow this convention.

For trie_update_elem() and trie_delete_elem(), annotate the walks as rcu_dereference_protected(*p, 1) -- matching trie_free() in the same file -- since trie->lock is held across the walk. rqspinlock has no lockdep_map, so the predicate degenerates to '1' rather than lockdep_is_held(&trie->lock); the protection is real but not machine-verifiable. trie_get_next_key() also uses bare rcu_dereference() but is reachable only from the BPF syscall, which holds classic rcu_read_lock() before dispatching, so it is left untouched.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
35
EG Risk 35/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
The EG Score, 7.8 of 10.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
2nd
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 25, 2026

Last Modified

September 3, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Sep 3, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

bpf: Allow LPM map access from sleepable BPF programs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f0967d4f1ba4323a3cb7dc8fdba74dd3a8caaf04
Web page

bpf: Allow LPM map access from sleepable BPF programs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ec662a8b2cde01e76b37ccd4b992d0342299e69c
Web page

bpf: Allow LPM map access from sleepable BPF programs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bd6ad9a6b30498d845413e863fb95c6fab3babe3
Web page

bpf: Allow LPM map access from sleepable BPF programs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9bfdf4b81b0e56d47bc6c46c34a46638be716695
Web page

bpf: Allow LPM map access from sleepable BPF programs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/57454944737f3ad9a8703aecbbb79713b513a94b
Web page

bpf: Allow LPM map access from sleepable BPF programs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/304ca50582f0c047370f85e13caec456f78c9fcc
Web page

bpf: Allow LPM map access from sleepable BPF programs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2f884d371fafea137afea504d49ee4a7c8d7985b

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64352(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(16)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (55 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.180-1: fixed in 6.1.180-1
—
linux-6.12—
  • every version up to 6.12.100-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.100-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.177-1~deb11u1 (22 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.180-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.180-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (31 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.100-1: fixed in 6.12.100-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (159 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.4-1: fixed in 7.1.4-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(16)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 76× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 189 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 89 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  2. 2026-10-13 11:43 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-13 11:43 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-13 11:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  5. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  6. 2026-10-12 15:48 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 19:32 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 16:47 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 14:09 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  12. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  14. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-07 06:12 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-07 06:12 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-07 06:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  18. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  19. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-04 07:33 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-04 07:33 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-04 07:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  24. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  25. 2026-10-02 19:28 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-02 19:28 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-02 19:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  3. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  4. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  5. 2026-10-01 15:08 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-01 15:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  7. 2026-10-01 04:16 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-01 04:16 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-01 04:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  10. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  11. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  12. 2026-09-28 04:16 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-28 04:16 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-09-28 04:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  15. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  16. 2026-09-25 09:48 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-25 09:48 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-25 09:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  19. 2026-09-24 09:01 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-09-24 09:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  21. 2026-09-23 22:10 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-23 22:10 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-09-23 22:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  24. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  25. 2026-09-23 09:02 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-09-23 09:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  27. 2026-09-22 22:04 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-22 22:04 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-09-22 22:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  30. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  31. 2026-09-20 01:27 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-20 01:27 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-09-20 01:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  34. 2026-09-18 19:51 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-09-18 19:51 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-09-18 19:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  37. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  38. 2026-09-18 02:48 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-18 02:48 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-09-18 02:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  41. 2026-09-17 01:55 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-17 01:55 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-09-17 01:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  44. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  45. 2026-09-16 06:31 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-16 06:31 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-09-16 06:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  48. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  49. 2026-09-15 09:25 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-09-15 09:25 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-09-15 09:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  52. 2026-09-14 10:15 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-09-14 10:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  54. 2026-09-13 22:57 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-09-13 22:57 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-09-13 22:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  57. 2026-09-13 12:05 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-09-13 12:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  59. 2026-09-13 01:13 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-09-13 01:13 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-09-13 01:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  62. 2026-09-12 14:09 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-09-12 14:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  64. 2026-09-12 03:17 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-09-12 03:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  66. 2026-09-11 16:25 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-09-11 16:25 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-09-11 16:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  69. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  70. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  71. 2026-09-11 02:16 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-09-11 02:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  73. 2026-09-10 13:26 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-09-10 13:26 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-09-10 13:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64352?
CVE-2026-64352 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Allow LPM map access from sleepable BPF programs trielookupelem() annotates its rcudereferencecheck() walks with only rcureadlockbhheld(). Because rcudereferencecheck(p, c) resolves to "c || rcureadlock_held()", this passes…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-64352 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-64352 was published on July 25, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 3, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-64352 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64352 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (2nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64352?
CVE-2026-64352 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64352?
A fix for CVE-2026-64352 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-64352 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64352

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64352?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.