CVE-2026-64331

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-07-25. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

usbip: vudc: fix NULL deref in vep_dequeue()

vep_alloc_request() wasn't initializing vrequest->udc, so cancellations on the FunctionFS AIO path were arriving in vep_dequeue without a valid UDC reference.

Since vrequest->udc is never actually properly used anywhere, we opt to remove it, and update vep_dequeue to obtain a reference to the udc with ep_to_vudc(), consistent with the other vep_ ops.

AFAICT this bug has existed for ~10 years. Seems that nobody has really stressed the FunctionFS AIO path on usbip's vudc.

I tested this fix in a QEMU aarch64 guest driving FunctionFS endpoints via AIO. Before the fix, running usbip attach from the host would cause the guest to oops with the following backtrace:

Call trace: vep_dequeue+0x1c/0xe4 (P) usb_ep_dequeue+0x14/0x20 ffs_aio_cancel+0x24/0x34 __arm64_sys_io_cancel+0xb0/0x124 do_el0_svc+0x68/0x100 el0_svc+0x18/0x5c el0t_64_sync_handler+0x98/0xdc el0t_64_sync+0x154/0x158

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
The EG Score, 5.5 of 10.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
1st
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 25, 2026

Last Modified

September 3, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Sep 3, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

usbip: vudc: fix NULL deref in vep_dequeue() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d0ebf9cc7c2ddf95a7cfc654b940bdacb7edde97
Web page

usbip: vudc: fix NULL deref in vep_dequeue() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c5371e0b91b24159a3ebaa61e70b0980bcf03c0a
Web page

usbip: vudc: fix NULL deref in vep_dequeue() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9858c91d9ee6a13c45311569039413729fc9b757
Web page

usbip: vudc: fix NULL deref in vep_dequeue() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3750f75f29f99c0223601e2ee73ad084adec47bd
Web page

usbip: vudc: fix NULL deref in vep_dequeue() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/347b59e9f96719d89b6ef555d02a18ada1a5846f
Web page

usbip: vudc: fix NULL deref in vep_dequeue() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1226293ec9bed3d4cc5b05eeeb811d315ca51652
Web page

usbip: vudc: fix NULL deref in vep_dequeue() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0443e4416aa1ee97748d1ed904eaf3352c60045e
Web page

usbip: vudc: fix NULL deref in vep_dequeue() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0025276175fbbe0dcbf3f84d090b0adee769e9d9

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64331(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(16)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(6 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (55 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.262-1: fixed in 5.10.262-1
—
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.177-1~deb11u1 (22 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.180-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.180-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (55 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.180-1: fixed in 6.1.180-1
—
linux-6.12—
  • every version up to 6.12.100-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.100-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.95-1~bpo12+1 (30 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.96-1: fixed in 6.12.96-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (159 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.4-1: fixed in 7.1.4-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(16)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 61× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 153 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 53 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 15:48 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 19:32 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 16:47 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 14:09 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  9. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  10. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  11. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  12. 2026-10-07 06:14 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-07 06:14 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-07 06:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x846-472j-jj99 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  15. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  16. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  17. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  18. 2026-10-04 07:35 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-04 07:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x846-472j-jj99 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  20. 2026-10-02 19:31 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-02 19:31 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-02 19:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x846-472j-jj99 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  23. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  24. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  25. 2026-10-01 04:18 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-01 04:18 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-01 04:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x846-472j-jj99 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  3. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  4. 2026-09-28 04:18 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-28 04:18 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-09-28 04:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x846-472j-jj99 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  7. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  8. 2026-09-25 09:51 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-25 09:51 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-09-25 09:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x846-472j-jj99 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  11. 2026-09-23 22:10 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-23 22:10 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-09-23 22:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x846-472j-jj99 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  14. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  15. 2026-09-22 22:05 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-09-22 22:05 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-09-22 22:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x846-472j-jj99 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  18. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  19. 2026-09-20 01:30 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-20 01:30 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-20 01:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x846-472j-jj99 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  22. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  23. 2026-09-18 08:39 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-18 08:39 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-09-18 08:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x846-472j-jj99 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  26. 2026-09-17 10:15 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-09-17 10:15 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-09-17 10:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x846-472j-jj99 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  29. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  30. 2026-09-16 11:57 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-16 11:57 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-09-16 11:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x846-472j-jj99 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  33. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  34. 2026-09-15 09:43 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-09-15 09:43 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-09-15 09:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x846-472j-jj99 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  37. 2026-09-14 11:24 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-14 11:24 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-09-14 11:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x846-472j-jj99 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  40. 2026-09-13 13:06 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-13 13:06 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-09-13 13:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x846-472j-jj99 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  43. 2026-09-12 14:46 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-09-12 14:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x846-472j-jj99 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  45. 2026-09-11 16:27 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-11 16:27 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-09-11 16:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x846-472j-jj99 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  48. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  49. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  50. 2026-09-10 13:28 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-10 13:28 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-09-10 13:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x846-472j-jj99 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  53. 2026-09-09 08:38 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-09-09 08:38 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-09-09 08:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x846-472j-jj99 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  56. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  57. 2026-09-07 21:18 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-09-07 21:18 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-09-07 21:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x846-472j-jj99 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  60. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  61. 2026-09-06 17:39 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-09-06 17:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x846-472j-jj99 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  63. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  64. 2026-09-05 19:21 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-09-05 19:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x846-472j-jj99 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  66. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  67. 2026-09-04 14:36 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-09-04 14:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x846-472j-jj99 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  69. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  70. 2026-09-03 16:17 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 5.5 MEDIUM
  71. 2026-09-03 16:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x846-472j-jj99
  72. 2026-09-03 16:12 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 5.5 · severity → MEDIUM
  73. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  74. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  75. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64331?
CVE-2026-64331 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usbip: vudc: fix NULL deref in vep_dequeue() vepallocrequest() wasn't initializing vrequest->udc, so cancellations on the FunctionFS AIO path were arriving in vep_dequeue without a valid UDC reference. Since vrequest->udc is never…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-64331 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-64331 was published on July 25, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 3, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-64331 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64331 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (1st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64331?
CVE-2026-64331 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64331?
A fix for CVE-2026-64331 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-64331 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64331

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64331?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.