CVE-2026-64320

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.19.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-07-25. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — Patch released this week
9.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 9.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nvmet: fix pre-auth out-of-bounds heap read in Discovery Get Log Page

nvmet_execute_disc_get_log_page() validates only the dword alignment of the host-supplied Log Page Offset (lpo). The 64-bit offset is then added to a small kzalloc'd buffer that holds the discovery log page and the result is passed straight to nvmet_copy_to_sgl(), which memcpy()s data_len bytes out to the host with no source-side bound check:

u64 offset = nvmet_get_log_page_offset(req->cmd); /* 64-bit host */ size_t data_len = nvmet_get_log_page_len(req->cmd); /* 32-bit host */ ... if (offset & 0x3) { ... } /* only check */ ... alloc_len = sizeof(*hdr) + entry_size * discovery_log_entries(req); buffer = kzalloc(alloc_len, GFP_KERNEL); ... status = nvmet_copy_to_sgl(req, 0, buffer + offset, data_len);

The Discovery controller is unauthenticated -- nvmet_host_allowed() returns true unconditionally for the discovery subsystem -- so the call is reachable pre-authentication by any TCP/RDMA/FC peer that can reach the nvmet target. With a discovery log page of ~1 KiB, an attacker requesting up to 4 KiB starting at offset == alloc_len reads the next slab page out and gets its content returned over the fabric (an empirical run on a default nvmet-tcp loopback target leaked 81 canonical kernel pointers in one Get Log Page response). Pointing the offset at unmapped kernel memory faults the in-kernel memcpy and crashes (or panics, on panic_on_oops=1) the target host instead.

The attacker-controlled source-side offset pattern "nvmet_copy_to_sgl(req, 0, buffer + ATTACKER_OFFSET, ...)" is unique to nvmet_execute_disc_get_log_page in the entire nvmet codebase: every other Get Log Page handler in admin-cmd.c either ignores lpo (and silently starts every response at offset 0) or tracks a local destination offset with a fixed source pointer.

Validate the host-supplied offset against the log page size, cap the copy length to what is actually available, and zero-fill any remainder of the host transfer buffer. The zero-fill matches the existing short-response pattern in nvmet_execute_get_log_changed_ns() (admin-cmd.c) and prevents leaking transport SGL contents when the host asks for more bytes than the log page contains.

CVSS v3
9.1
EG Score
9.1CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
41
EG Risk 41/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity91% × 45%
The EG Score, 9.1 of 10.
Exploitation0.8% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
53rd
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 25, 2026

Last Modified

September 3, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 15, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

nvmet: fix pre-auth out-of-bounds heap read in Discovery Get Log Page - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a29b316b9bbfd269f323ab4ba9906a894025680f
Web page

nvmet: fix pre-auth out-of-bounds heap read in Discovery Get Log Page - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/56c021a0869260d04c4b65d1471936aaf9177114
Web page

nvmet: fix pre-auth out-of-bounds heap read in Discovery Get Log Page - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/53cd102a7a56079b11b897835bd9b94c14e6322c
Web page

nvmet: fix pre-auth out-of-bounds heap read in Discovery Get Log Page - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/33b974eb626154ae9348f2bac7de84cb2a3d9dd4

Patch Availability(20)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (358 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.12—
  • every version up to 6.12.100-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.100-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (500 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.95-1~bpo12+1 (30 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.96-1: fixed in 6.12.96-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (159 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.4-1: fixed in 7.1.4-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(14)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 19× in last 7d / 113× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 487 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 387 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-14 09:47 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-14 09:47 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-14 09:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  4. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  5. 2026-10-13 07:36 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-13 07:36 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-13 07:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  8. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  9. 2026-10-12 15:48 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-12 06:09 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-12 06:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  12. 2026-10-11 19:32 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 16:47 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-11 14:09 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  16. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  17. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  18. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  19. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  20. 2026-10-07 06:17 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-07 06:17 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-07 06:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  23. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  24. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  25. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-04 12:41 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-04 12:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  3. 2026-10-04 07:37 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-04 07:37 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-04 07:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  6. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  7. 2026-10-03 03:16 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-03 03:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  9. 2026-10-02 19:34 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-02 19:34 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-02 19:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  12. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  13. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  14. 2026-10-01 12:57 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-01 12:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  16. 2026-10-01 08:42 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-01 08:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  18. 2026-10-01 04:25 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-01 04:25 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-01 04:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  21. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  22. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  23. 2026-09-28 12:59 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-28 12:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  25. 2026-09-28 08:34 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-09-28 08:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  27. 2026-09-28 04:19 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-28 04:19 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-09-28 04:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  30. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  31. 2026-09-25 09:52 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-25 09:52 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-09-25 09:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  34. 2026-09-24 11:00 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-09-24 10:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  36. 2026-09-24 06:44 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-09-24 06:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  38. 2026-09-24 02:29 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-09-24 02:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  40. 2026-09-23 22:10 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-23 22:10 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-09-23 22:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  43. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  44. 2026-09-23 10:55 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-09-23 10:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  46. 2026-09-23 06:34 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-09-23 06:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  48. 2026-09-23 02:20 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-23 02:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  50. 2026-09-22 22:05 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-22 22:05 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-09-22 22:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  53. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  54. 2026-09-20 05:45 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-09-20 05:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  56. 2026-09-20 01:31 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-09-20 01:31 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-09-20 01:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  59. 2026-09-19 00:14 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-09-19 00:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  61. 2026-09-18 19:52 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-09-18 19:52 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-09-18 19:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  64. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  65. 2026-09-18 11:19 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-09-18 11:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  67. 2026-09-18 07:05 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-09-18 07:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  69. 2026-09-18 02:50 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-09-18 02:50 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-09-18 02:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  72. 2026-09-17 09:13 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-09-17 09:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qw96-j6m6-f3qh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  74. 2026-09-17 01:56 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-09-17 01:56 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64320?
CVE-2026-64320 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nvmet: fix pre-auth out-of-bounds heap read in Discovery Get Log Page nvmetexecutediscgetlog_page() validates only the dword alignment of the host-supplied Log Page Offset (lpo). The 64-bit offset is then added to a small kzalloc'd…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-64320 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-64320 was published on July 25, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 3, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-64320 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64320 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (53rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64320?
CVE-2026-64320 has a CVSS base score of 9.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64320?
A fix for CVE-2026-64320 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-64320 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64320

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64320?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.