CVE-2026-64273

HIGHNVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-25. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

Input: iforce - bound the device-reported force-feedback effect index

iforce_process_packet() handles a status report (packet id 0x02) by taking a force-feedback effect index straight from the device wire and using it to address the per-effect state array:

i = data[1] & 0x7f; if (data[1] & 0x80) { if (!test_and_set_bit(FF_CORE_IS_PLAYED, iforce->core_effects[i].flags)) ... } else if (test_and_clear_bit(FF_CORE_IS_PLAYED, iforce->core_effects[i].flags)) { ... }

The index is masked only with 0x7f, so it ranges 0..127, but core_effects[] holds only IFORCE_EFFECTS_MAX (32) entries. For an index of 32..127 the test_and_set_bit()/test_and_clear_bit() is an out-of-bounds single-bit read-modify-write past the array. core_effects[] is the second-to-last member of struct iforce, so the write lands in the trailing members and beyond the embedding kzalloc()'d iforce_serio / iforce_usb object.

data[1] is unvalidated device payload on both transports (the USB interrupt endpoint and serio), and the status path is not gated on force feedback being present, so a malicious or counterfeit device can set or clear a bit at an attacker-chosen offset past the object.

Reject an out-of-range index instead of indexing with it. Bound against the array dimension IFORCE_EFFECTS_MAX rather than dev->ff->max_effects so the check guarantees memory safety regardless of how many effects the device registered. A legitimate "effect started/stopped" status always carries an index below IFORCE_EFFECTS_MAX, so well-formed devices are unaffected; the neighbouring mark_core_as_ready() loop is already bounded and is left untouched.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
6%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 25, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Aug 13, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

Input: iforce - bound the device-reported force-feedback effect index - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e5fa31f0550b55d80045669ae9080dd5b88abffa
generic

Input: iforce - bound the device-reported force-feedback effect index - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d10b0507fa0f5b46764b178e3271f9012f2df677
generic

Input: iforce - bound the device-reported force-feedback effect index - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c21295616a8a52b9a5f18cd4ca8c73030eda3d4f
generic

Input: iforce - bound the device-reported force-feedback effect index - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b1b79e89bc33e4c682d3df7ae2aadc62b5a0c310
generic

Input: iforce - bound the device-reported force-feedback effect index - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a40250f97c312e000e3616c9074022311a0efbc3
generic

Input: iforce - bound the device-reported force-feedback effect index - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/70019779325f2bb5f5a4098e91e79c655f50fcef
generic

Input: iforce - bound the device-reported force-feedback effect index - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6c0f2901c9d325d4a0574c4237fd507810d225ff
generic

Input: iforce - bound the device-reported force-feedback effect index - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0e9943d2e4c63496b6ca84bc66fd3c71d40558e2

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64273(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(6 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (55 versions)5.10.262-1
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.177-1~deb11u1 (22 versions)6.1.180-1~deb11u1
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (55 versions)6.1.180-1
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.95-1~bpo12+1 (30 versions)6.12.96-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (156 versions)7.1.4-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 24× in last 7d / 76× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-27 10:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-26 22:49 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-26 22:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-26 10:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-25 22:21 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-25 22:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-25 10:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-24 22:01 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-24 22:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-24 09:52 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-24 09:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-23 21:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-23 09:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-22 21:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-22 09:05 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-22 09:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-21 20:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-21 08:45 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-21 08:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-20 20:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-20 08:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 62 more
  1. 2026-08-19 20:16 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-19 20:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-19 07:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-18 18:51 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-18 18:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-18 05:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-17 17:30 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-17 17:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-17 05:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-16 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-16 19:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-16 07:23 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-16 07:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-15 19:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-15 07:04 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-15 07:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-14 18:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-14 06:40 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-14 06:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-13 18:30 UTCEG score recompute 7.80
  27. 2026-08-13 18:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-08-13 18:30 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  29. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-08-10 23:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-08-09 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-08 03:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-08-05 07:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-04 10:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-08-02 11:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-07-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-07-30 15:16 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-07-30 15:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-07-28 23:04 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-07-28 23:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-07-28 15:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-07-27 14:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-07-26 02:53 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-07-26 02:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-07-25 10:39 UTCNVD update
  61. 2026-07-25 09:41 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-07-25 09:21 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64273?
CVE-2026-64273 is a high vulnerability published on July 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Input: iforce - bound the device-reported force-feedback effect index iforceprocesspacket() handles a status report (packet id 0x02) by taking a force-feedback effect index straight from the device wire and using it to address the…
When was CVE-2026-64273 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64273 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 25, 2026, with the most recent update on August 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64273 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64273 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 93.6% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64273?
CVE-2026-64273 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64273?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64273, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64273

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64273?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.