CVE-2026-64269

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.19.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 9.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-07-25. a secondary CVSS source baseline 9.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
9.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 9.1Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

RDMA/rtrs-srv: Bound RDMA-Write length to chunk size in rdma_write_sg

When the server answers an RTRS READ, rdma_write_sg() builds the source scatter/gather entry for the IB_WR_RDMA_WRITE that returns data to the peer. Its length is taken directly from the wire descriptor:

plist->length = le32_to_cpu(id->rd_msg->desc[0].len);

rd_msg points into the chunk buffer that the remote peer filled via RDMA-WRITE-WITH-IMM (rtrs_srv_rdma_done() -> process_io_req() -> process_read()), so desc[0].len is attacker-controlled and, before this change, was only rejected when zero. The source address is the fixed chunk start (dma_addr[msg_id]) and the source lkey is the PD-wide local_dma_lkey, which is not tied to the chunk's MR mapping, so the verbs layer does not constrain the transfer length to max_chunk_size. msg_id and off are bounded against queue_depth and max_chunk_size in rtrs_srv_rdma_done(), but desc[0].len is a separate field that was not checked against the chunk size.

A peer that advertises desc[0].len larger than max_chunk_size can make the posted RDMA write read past the chunk's mapped region. The resulting behaviour depends on the IOMMU configuration: with no IOMMU or in passthrough mode the read may extend into memory adjacent to the chunk and be returned to the peer, which can disclose host memory; with a translating IOMMU the out-of-range access is expected to fault and abort the connection. In either case the transfer exceeds what the protocol permits and is driven by a remote peer.

Reject a descriptor length above max_chunk_size, mirroring the existing off >= max_chunk_size bound in rtrs_srv_rdma_done(). Legitimate clients do not exceed it: the client sets desc[0].len to its MR length, which is capped at the negotiated max_io_size (max_chunk_size - MAX_HDR_SIZE).

CVSS v3
9.1
EG Score
9.1(medium)
EG Risk
46(Track)
EG Risk 46/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity91% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
51%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 25, 2026

Last Modified

August 23, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Aug 29, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

RDMA/rtrs-srv: Bound RDMA-Write length to chunk size in rdma_write_sg - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/da3e44add94b05dfde56f898421922f5cf35705f
generic

RDMA/rtrs-srv: Bound RDMA-Write length to chunk size in rdma_write_sg - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a35b7a8728a53ddc80b323970689fa5985816836
generic

RDMA/rtrs-srv: Bound RDMA-Write length to chunk size in rdma_write_sg - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/963af8d97a8c6a117134a8d0db1415e0489200b1
generic

RDMA/rtrs-srv: Bound RDMA-Write length to chunk size in rdma_write_sg - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6f40246f4312fdbab5a13cc440adebf95eb2aa66
generic

RDMA/rtrs-srv: Bound RDMA-Write length to chunk size in rdma_write_sg - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6cada540150894e81042a0ae0c796a21a9a877da
generic

RDMA/rtrs-srv: Bound RDMA-Write length to chunk size in rdma_write_sg - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/68c09762172f6224e9ddf9b0a60bacbb36e443eb
generic

RDMA/rtrs-srv: Bound RDMA-Write length to chunk size in rdma_write_sg - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5a45d0aa1fa50a333ce5763ade744e2d89838667
generic

RDMA/rtrs-srv: Bound RDMA-Write length to chunk size in rdma_write_sg - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2912f3d40355dabc08fdbaaf2764d02445fe88dc

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64269(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(6 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (500 versions)
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.177-1~deb11u1 (22 versions)6.1.180-1~deb11u1
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (55 versions)6.1.180-1
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.95-1~bpo12+1 (30 versions)6.12.96-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (156 versions)7.1.4-1

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 72× in last 7d / 336× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 384 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-30 07:58 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-08-30 07:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-30 04:07 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-30 04:07 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-30 04:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-30 00:12 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-30 00:12 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-30 00:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-28 01:29 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-28 01:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-27 21:06 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-27 21:06 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-27 21:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-27 13:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-27 09:58 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-27 09:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-27 03:37 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-27 03:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-26 23:43 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-26 23:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-26 19:51 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-26 19:51 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-26 19:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-26 14:30 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-26 14:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-26 10:39 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-26 10:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-26 06:00 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-08-26 06:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-26 02:09 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-26 02:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-25 22:17 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-25 22:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-25 17:44 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-25 17:44 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-25 17:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-25 13:20 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-25 13:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-25 09:29 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-25 09:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-25 05:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-25 01:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-24 21:55 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-24 21:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-24 18:04 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-24 18:04 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-08-24 18:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-08-24 12:35 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-08-24 12:35 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-24 12:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-24 08:44 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-08-24 08:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-08-24 04:51 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-08-24 04:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-24 00:59 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-08-24 00:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-08-23 21:04 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-23 21:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-08-23 17:12 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-08-23 17:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-08-23 13:21 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-08-23 13:21 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-23 13:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-23 13:09 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-23 13:09 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-23 13:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-23 09:49 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-08-23 09:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-08-23 05:58 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-08-23 05:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-08-23 02:06 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-08-23 02:06 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-08-23 02:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-08-22 22:15 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-08-22 22:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-08-22 18:24 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-22 18:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-22 14:33 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-22 14:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-08-22 10:42 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-22 10:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-08-22 06:51 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-22 06:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-22 03:00 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-08-22 03:00 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-08-22 03:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-08-21 23:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-08-21 19:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-08-21 15:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-21 11:29 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-21 11:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-08-21 07:12 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-21 07:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-08-21 03:20 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64269?
CVE-2026-64269 is a critical vulnerability published on July 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/rtrs-srv: Bound RDMA-Write length to chunk size in rdmawritesg When the server answers an RTRS READ, rdmawritesg() builds the source scatter/gather entry for the IBWRRDMA_WRITE that returns data to the peer. Its length is…
When was CVE-2026-64269 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64269 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 25, 2026, with the most recent update on August 23, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64269 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64269 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 49.3% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64269?
CVE-2026-64269 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64269?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64269, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64269

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64269?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.