CVE-2026-64232

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-07-24. a secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

block: recompute nr_integrity_segments in blk_insert_cloned_request

blk_insert_cloned_request() already recomputes nr_phys_segments against the bottom queue, because "the queue settings related to segment counting may differ from the original queue." The exact same reasoning applies to integrity segments: a stacked driver's underlying queue can have tighter virt_boundary_mask, seg_boundary_mask, or max_segment_size than the top queue, in which case blk_rq_count_integrity_sg() against the bottom queue produces a different count than the cached rq->nr_integrity_segments inherited from the source request by blk_rq_prep_clone().

When the cached count is lower than the bottom queue's actual count, blk_rq_map_integrity_sg() trips

BUG_ON(segments > rq->nr_integrity_segments);

on dispatch. The same families of stacked setups that motivated the existing nr_phys_segments recompute -- dm-multipath fanning out to nvme-rdma in particular -- can produce this.

Mirror the nr_phys_segments handling: when the request carries integrity, recompute nr_integrity_segments against the bottom queue and reject the request if it exceeds the bottom queue's max_integrity_segments. blk_rq_count_integrity_sg() and queue_max_integrity_segments() are both already available via , which blk-mq.c includes.

This closes a latent gap in the stacking contract and brings the integrity-segment accounting in line with the existing phys-segment accounting.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8(medium)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity98% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
38%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 24, 2026

Last Modified

August 12, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Aug 26, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

block: recompute nr_integrity_segments in blk_insert_cloned_request - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/53a01bcc0242590eda4c452a5bd996f62457113b
generic

block: recompute nr_integrity_segments in blk_insert_cloned_request - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/42929c98d044f126508baf54a65b0f87f932fa75
generic

block: recompute nr_integrity_segments in blk_insert_cloned_request - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2c6e6a18a37b905cb584eb0dda3ae482162a81ca
generic

block: recompute nr_integrity_segments in blk_insert_cloned_request - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0943f81e1b3176f27dbaf6db268fc69d8a94f0ba

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64232(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(3)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)6.12.94-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (138 versions)7.0.12-1

All Vendor Advisories

(3)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 65× in last 7d / 354× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 403 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-30 04:34 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 04:34 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-30 04:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-30 00:18 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-30 00:18 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-08-30 00:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-28 01:29 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-28 01:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-27 21:06 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-27 21:06 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-27 21:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-27 14:15 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-27 14:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-27 10:00 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-27 10:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-27 04:45 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-27 04:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-27 00:08 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-08-27 00:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-26 19:52 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-26 19:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-26 14:54 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-26 14:54 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-26 14:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-26 10:39 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-26 10:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-26 04:53 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-26 04:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-26 00:38 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-26 00:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-25 19:52 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-25 19:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-25 15:38 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-25 15:38 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-25 15:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-25 11:06 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-25 11:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-25 06:51 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-25 06:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-25 02:36 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-25 02:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-24 22:21 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-24 22:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-24 18:06 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-24 18:06 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-24 18:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-24 12:18 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-08-24 12:18 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-24 12:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-24 08:03 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-08-24 08:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-08-24 03:48 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-24 03:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-23 23:33 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-08-23 23:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-08-23 19:18 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-08-23 19:18 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-23 19:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-08-23 15:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-23 10:48 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-23 10:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-23 06:34 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-23 06:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-23 02:18 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-23 02:18 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-23 02:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-08-22 22:01 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-22 22:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-22 17:46 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-22 17:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-08-22 13:31 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-08-22 13:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-08-22 09:12 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-22 09:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-22 04:57 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-22 04:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-08-22 00:42 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-08-22 00:42 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-22 00:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-08-21 20:27 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-08-21 20:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-08-21 16:12 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-21 16:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-08-21 11:51 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-08-21 11:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-08-21 07:36 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-21 07:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-08-21 03:20 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-21 03:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-20 23:00 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-20 23:00 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-20 22:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-08-20 18:44 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64232?
CVE-2026-64232 is a critical vulnerability published on July 24, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block: recompute nrintegritysegments in blkinsertcloned_request blkinsertclonedrequest() already recomputes nrphys_segments against the bottom queue, because "the queue settings related to segment counting may differ from the…
When was CVE-2026-64232 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64232 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 24, 2026, with the most recent update on August 12, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64232 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64232 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 62.2% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64232?
CVE-2026-64232 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64232?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64232, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64232

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64232?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.