CVE-2026-64209

HIGHNVD 7.17.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 7.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-24. NVD baseline CVSS 7.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
7.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

phy: qcom: qmp-usbc: Fix out-of-bounds array access in dp swing config

swing_tbl and pre_emphasis_tbl are 4x4 arrays (valid indices 0-3), but the boundary check uses "> 4" instead of ">= 4", allowing index 4 to cause an out-of-bounds access.

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
32
EG Risk 32/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity71% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
4th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.1 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 24, 2026

Last Modified

August 12, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 12, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

phy: qcom: qmp-usbc: Fix out-of-bounds array access in dp swing config - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ea17fc4d7dc2ba6459b1a318962960520201baf1
Web page

phy: qcom: qmp-usbc: Fix out-of-bounds array access in dp swing config - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cb35af6e7f3d5628178b58c631e305b1def8edf7

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64209(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(6)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (142 versions)
  • every version up to 7.0.12-1: fixed in 7.0.12-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(6)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 55× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 265 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 165 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  2. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  3. 2026-10-18 03:22 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  5. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  6. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  7. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  8. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  9. 2026-10-13 11:45 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-13 11:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2j9g-74p9-mq3f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  11. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  12. 2026-10-12 15:48 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 19:32 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-11 16:48 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-11 14:09 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  17. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  18. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  19. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  20. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  21. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  22. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  23. 2026-10-04 07:46 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-04 07:46 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-04 07:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2j9g-74p9-mq3f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  2. 2026-10-03 03:20 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-03 03:20 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-03 03:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2j9g-74p9-mq3f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  5. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  6. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  7. 2026-10-01 06:03 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-01 06:03 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-01 06:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2j9g-74p9-mq3f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  10. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  11. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  12. 2026-09-28 04:31 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-28 04:31 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-09-28 04:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2j9g-74p9-mq3f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  15. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  16. 2026-09-25 10:13 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-25 10:13 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-25 10:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2j9g-74p9-mq3f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  19. 2026-09-24 10:08 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-09-24 10:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2j9g-74p9-mq3f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  21. 2026-09-23 22:19 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-23 22:19 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-09-23 22:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2j9g-74p9-mq3f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  24. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  25. 2026-09-23 10:13 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-09-23 10:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2j9g-74p9-mq3f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  27. 2026-09-22 22:23 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-22 22:23 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-09-22 22:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2j9g-74p9-mq3f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  30. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  31. 2026-09-20 01:43 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-20 01:43 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-09-20 01:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2j9g-74p9-mq3f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  34. 2026-09-18 22:29 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-09-18 22:29 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-09-18 22:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2j9g-74p9-mq3f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  37. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  38. 2026-09-18 03:01 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-18 03:01 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-09-18 03:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2j9g-74p9-mq3f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  41. 2026-09-17 01:59 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-17 01:59 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-09-17 01:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2j9g-74p9-mq3f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  44. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  45. 2026-09-16 06:41 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-16 06:41 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-09-16 06:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2j9g-74p9-mq3f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  48. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  49. 2026-09-15 09:39 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-09-15 09:39 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-09-15 09:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2j9g-74p9-mq3f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  52. 2026-09-14 16:13 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-09-14 16:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2j9g-74p9-mq3f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  54. 2026-09-14 04:23 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-09-14 04:23 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-09-14 04:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2j9g-74p9-mq3f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  57. 2026-09-13 16:34 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-09-13 16:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2j9g-74p9-mq3f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  59. 2026-09-13 04:45 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-09-13 04:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2j9g-74p9-mq3f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  61. 2026-09-12 16:55 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-09-12 16:55 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-09-12 16:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2j9g-74p9-mq3f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  64. 2026-09-12 05:06 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-09-12 05:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2j9g-74p9-mq3f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  66. 2026-09-11 16:37 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-09-11 16:37 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-09-11 16:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2j9g-74p9-mq3f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  69. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  70. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  71. 2026-09-11 02:46 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-09-11 02:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2j9g-74p9-mq3f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  73. 2026-09-10 14:48 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-09-10 14:48 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-09-10 14:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2j9g-74p9-mq3f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64209?
CVE-2026-64209 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 24, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: phy: qcom: qmp-usbc: Fix out-of-bounds array access in dp swing config swingtbl and preemphasis_tbl are 4x4 arrays (valid indices 0-3), but the boundary check uses "> 4" instead of ">= 4", allowing index 4 to cause an out-of-bounds…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-64209 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-64209 was published on July 24, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 12, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-64209 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64209 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (4th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64209?
CVE-2026-64209 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64209?
A fix for CVE-2026-64209 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-64209 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64209

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64209?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.