CVE-2026-64192

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-07-20. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Reject BPF_MAP_TYPE_INODE_STORAGE creation if BPF LSM is uninitialized

When CONFIG_BPF_LSM=y is set, BPF inode storage maps (BPF_MAP_TYPE_INODE_STORAGE) are compiled into the kernel. However, if the BPF LSM is not explicitly enabled at boot time (e.g. omitted from the "lsm=" boot parameter), lsm_prepare() is never executed for the BPF LSM.

Consequently, the BPF inode security blob offset (bpf_lsm_blob_sizes.lbs_inode) is never initialized and remains at its default compiled size of 8 bytes instead of being updated to a valid offset past the reserved struct rcu_head (typically 16 bytes or more).

When a privileged user creates and updates a BPF_MAP_TYPE_INODE_STORAGE map, bpf_inode() evaluates inode->i_security + 8. This erroneously aliases the struct rcu_head.func callback pointer at the beginning of the inode->i_security blob. During subsequent map element cleanup or inode destruction, writing NULL to owner_storage clears the queued RCU callback pointer. When rcu_do_batch() later executes the queued callback, it attempts an instruction fetch at address 0x0, triggering an immediate kernel panic.

Fix this by introducing a global bpf_lsm_initialized boolean flag marked with __ro_after_init. Set this flag to true inside bpf_lsm_init() when the LSM framework successfully registers the BPF LSM. Gate map allocation in inode_storage_map_alloc() on this flag, returning -EOPNOTSUPP if the BPF LSM is in turn uninitialized.

This fail-fast approach prevents userspace from allocating inode storage maps when the supporting BPF LSM infrastructure is absent, avoiding zombie map states.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 20, 2026

Last Modified

August 23, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Aug 12, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

bpf: Reject BPF_MAP_TYPE_INODE_STORAGE creation if BPF LSM is uninitialized - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/de984ea883405420fdc416ae8964b752df586970
generic

bpf: Reject BPF_MAP_TYPE_INODE_STORAGE creation if BPF LSM is uninitialized - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c76b8abce575e0c6e4096957220b4515ed847d89
generic

bpf: Reject BPF_MAP_TYPE_INODE_STORAGE creation if BPF LSM is uninitialized - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a6f0643e4f63cfaa0d5d4a69de4f132eac4b8fe4
generic

bpf: Reject BPF_MAP_TYPE_INODE_STORAGE creation if BPF LSM is uninitialized - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5337eebdf8c5d4810b1913047f078d2815d5645f
generic

bpf: Reject BPF_MAP_TYPE_INODE_STORAGE creation if BPF LSM is uninitialized - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/267fdd9b6530c399dfd996e1a0a7628b45baf9f0

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64192(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (338 versions)
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (500 versions)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (31 versions)6.12.100-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (156 versions)7.1.4-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 24× in last 7d / 86× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 350 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-30 02:36 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 02:36 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-30 02:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-27 11:41 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-27 11:41 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-27 11:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-26 11:01 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-26 11:01 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-26 11:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-25 10:48 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-08-25 10:48 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-25 10:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-24 12:15 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-24 12:15 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-24 12:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-23 13:21 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-08-23 13:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-23 13:09 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-23 13:09 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-23 13:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-22 22:05 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-22 22:05 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-22 22:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-21 23:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-21 00:58 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-21 00:58 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-21 00:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-20 02:25 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-20 02:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-19 03:51 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-19 03:51 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-19 03:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-18 03:56 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-18 03:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-17 05:22 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-17 05:22 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-17 05:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-16 12:28 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-16 12:28 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-08-16 12:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-08-15 13:55 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-08-15 13:55 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-15 13:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-08-14 15:22 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-08-14 15:22 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-08-14 15:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-13 16:48 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-08-13 16:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-08-12 17:50 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-08-12 17:50 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-08-12 17:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-08-11 19:17 UTCEG score recompute 5.50
  42. 2026-08-11 19:17 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-08-11 19:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-08-11 19:17 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 5.5 · severity → MEDIUM
  45. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-08-09 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-08-09 09:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-08-06 09:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-08-04 10:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-08-03 10:26 UTCNVD update
  57. 2026-08-03 10:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-03 10:13 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  59. 2026-08-02 14:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-07-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-30 15:18 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-07-30 15:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-29 04:10 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-07-29 04:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-07-28 15:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-07-27 14:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-07-26 04:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64192?
CVE-2026-64192 is a medium vulnerability published on July 20, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Reject BPFMAPTYPEINODESTORAGE creation if BPF LSM is uninitialized When CONFIGBPFLSM=y is set, BPF inode storage maps (BPFMAPTYPEINODESTORAGE) are compiled into the kernel. However, if the BPF LSM is not explicitly enabled at…
When was CVE-2026-64192 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64192 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 20, 2026, with the most recent update on August 23, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64192 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64192 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 98.1% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64192?
CVE-2026-64192 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64192?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64192, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64192

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64192?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.