CVE-2026-64044

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-19. the CNA's CVSS baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ovpn: respect peer refcount in CMD_NEW_PEER error path

ovpn_nl_peer_new_doit()'s error path calls ovpn_peer_release() directly rather than ovpn_peer_put(), bypassing the kref. The accompanying comment ("peer was not yet hashed, thus it is not used in any context") holds for UDP but not for TCP.

For UDP, the ovpn_socket union uses the .ovpn arm and never points back at a peer; UDP encap_recv looks up peers via the not-yet-populated hashtables, so the new peer is unreachable until ovpn_peer_add() publishes it.

For TCP, ovpn_socket_new() sets ovpn_sock->peer and ovpn_tcp_socket_attach() publishes ovpn_sock via rcu_assign_sk_user_data(). From that moment until ovpn_socket_release() detaches in the error path, the TCP fd is fully wired: userspace recvmsg / sendmsg / close / poll on the fd, as well as the strparser-driven ovpn_tcp_rcv() path, can reach the peer through sk_user_data -> ovpn_sock->peer and bump its refcount via ovpn_peer_hold().

ovpn_tcp_socket_wait_finish() (called inside ovpn_socket_release()) drains strparser and the tx work, but does not synchronize with userspace syscall callers that already hold a peer reference. If ovpn_nl_peer_modify() or ovpn_peer_add() returns an error while such a caller is in flight - notably an ovpn_tcp_recvmsg() blocked in __skb_recv_datagram() on peer->tcp.user_queue - the direct ovpn_peer_release() destroys the peer while the caller still holds the reference, and the eventual ovpn_peer_put() from that caller operates on freed memory.

Replace the direct destructor call with ovpn_peer_put() so the kref correctly defers destruction until the last reference is dropped. In the common case where no concurrent user is present, behaviour is unchanged: the kref hits zero immediately and ovpn_peer_release_kref() runs the same destructor.

With this conversion ovpn_peer_release() has no callers outside peer.c

  • ovpn_peer_release_kref() in the same translation unit is the only
remaining user - so make it static and drop its declaration from peer.h.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
7%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Jul 21, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

ovpn: respect peer refcount in CMD_NEW_PEER error path - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8298834912d76dbc82c12b6b4ab7590ed2bb8ae5
generic

ovpn: respect peer refcount in CMD_NEW_PEER error path - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1fef6614673ff0846d30acdeeaf3cf98bb5f6116
generic

ovpn: respect peer refcount in CMD_NEW_PEER error path - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0c3ef71879c0264de6c42463031d9e057da87840

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64044(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(5)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (138 versions)7.0.12-1

All Vendor Advisories

(5)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 32× in last 7d / 165× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 212 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-30 02:51 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 02:51 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-30 02:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-27 23:48 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-27 23:48 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-27 23:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-27 11:50 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-27 11:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-26 22:19 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-26 22:19 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-26 22:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-26 07:23 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-26 07:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-25 18:47 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-25 18:47 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-25 18:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-25 06:59 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-25 06:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-24 19:22 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-24 19:22 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-24 19:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-24 07:46 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-08-24 07:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-23 19:49 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-23 19:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-23 08:13 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-23 08:13 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-08-23 08:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-22 20:38 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-22 20:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-22 09:02 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-22 09:02 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-22 09:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-21 21:25 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-21 21:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-21 09:49 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-21 09:49 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-21 09:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-20 22:14 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-20 22:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-20 10:35 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-20 10:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-19 23:00 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-08-19 23:00 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-08-19 23:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-08-19 07:24 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-08-19 07:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-08-18 19:47 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-08-18 19:47 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-08-18 19:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-18 03:41 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-08-18 03:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-08-17 15:35 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-08-17 15:35 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-08-17 15:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-08-17 04:00 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-17 04:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-16 16:24 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-16 16:24 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-16 16:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-08-16 04:49 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-08-16 04:49 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-08-16 04:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-08-15 17:14 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-15 17:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-08-15 05:39 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-15 05:39 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-15 05:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-08-14 18:03 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-14 18:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-14 06:28 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-14 06:28 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-14 06:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-08-13 18:53 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-13 18:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-13 07:17 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-13 07:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-08-12 19:11 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-08-12 19:11 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-12 19:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-08-12 07:36 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-12 07:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-08-11 20:01 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-08-11 20:01 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-11 20:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-08-11 08:24 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64044?
CVE-2026-64044 is a high vulnerability published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ovpn: respect peer refcount in CMDNEWPEER error path ovpnnlpeernewdoit()'s error path calls ovpnpeerrelease() directly rather than ovpnpeerput(), bypassing the kref. The accompanying comment ("peer was not yet hashed, thus it is…
When was CVE-2026-64044 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64044 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 19, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64044 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64044 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 92.8% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64044?
CVE-2026-64044 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 7.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64044?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64044, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64044

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64044?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.