CVE-2026-63996

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-19. the CNA's CVSS baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ethtool: cmis: require exact CDB reply length

Malicious SFP module could respond with rpl_len longer than what cmis_cdb_process_reply() expected, leading to OOB writes. Malicious HW is a bit theoretical but some modules may just be buggy and/or the reads may occasionally get corrupted, so let's protect the kernel.

The existing check protects from short replies. We need to protect from long ones, too. All callers that pass a non-zero rpl_exp_len cast the reply payload to a fixed-layout struct and read fields at fixed offsets, with no version negotiation or short-reply handling:

  • cmis_cdb_validate_password()
  • cmis_cdb_module_features_get()
  • cmis_fw_update_fw_mng_features_get()

so let's assume that responses longer than expected do not have to be handled gracefully here. Add a warning message to make the debug easier in case my understanding is wrong...

Note that page_data->length (argument of kmalloc) comes from last arg to ethtool_cmis_page_init() which is rpl_exp_len.

Note2 that AIs also like to point out overflows in args->req.payload itself (which is a fixed-size 120 B buffer, on the stack), but callers should be reading structs defined by the standard, so protecting from requests for more data than max seem like defensive programming.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Jul 21, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

ethtool: cmis: require exact CDB reply length - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb5dcd740cd7fa27bc2caeff2d28ef28e93ff4d3
generic

ethtool: cmis: require exact CDB reply length - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6c3f999a9d1338c6c89a9ff4549eafe72bc2e7b1
generic

ethtool: cmis: require exact CDB reply length - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4d42fb88ec61f2e98c33a9e3a2de371d5edbc6b1
generic

ethtool: cmis: require exact CDB reply length - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2f818cc98fd2c63a08239cb48995f6c3bfe9d9b3

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-63996(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(5)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)6.12.94-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (138 versions)7.0.12-1

All Vendor Advisories

(5)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 31× in last 7d / 159× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 206 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-30 02:53 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 02:53 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-30 02:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-28 02:05 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-28 02:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-27 13:57 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-27 13:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-27 01:50 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-27 01:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-26 13:42 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-26 13:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-26 01:04 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-26 01:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-25 12:58 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-25 12:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-25 00:44 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-25 00:44 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-25 00:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-24 12:37 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-24 12:37 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-24 12:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-24 00:30 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-24 00:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-23 12:24 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-23 12:24 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-23 12:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-23 00:17 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-23 00:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-22 12:10 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-22 12:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-21 23:51 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-21 23:51 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-21 23:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-21 11:43 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-21 11:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-20 23:17 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-20 23:17 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-20 23:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-20 11:10 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-20 11:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-19 23:04 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-19 23:04 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-08-19 23:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-08-19 07:56 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-19 07:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-18 19:49 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-18 19:49 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-18 19:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-18 04:48 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-08-18 04:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-08-17 16:41 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-08-17 16:41 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-17 16:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-17 04:06 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-17 04:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-08-16 15:59 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-08-16 15:59 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-16 15:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-08-16 03:53 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-16 03:53 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-16 03:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-15 15:47 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-15 15:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-08-15 03:40 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-15 03:40 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-15 03:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-08-14 15:33 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-14 15:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-08-14 03:26 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-08-14 03:26 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-14 03:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-08-13 15:20 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-08-13 15:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-08-13 03:06 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-13 03:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-08-12 15:00 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-12 15:00 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-12 15:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-08-12 02:53 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-12 02:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-11 14:46 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-11 14:46 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-11 14:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-11 02:39 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-11 02:39 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-63996?
CVE-2026-63996 is a high vulnerability published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ethtool: cmis: require exact CDB reply length Malicious SFP module could respond with rpl_len longer than what cmiscdbprocess_reply() expected, leading to OOB writes. Malicious HW is a bit theoretical but some modules may just be…
When was CVE-2026-63996 disclosed?
CVE-2026-63996 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 19, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-63996 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-63996 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.2% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63996?
CVE-2026-63996 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 7.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63996?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-63996, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-63996

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63996?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.