CVE-2026-63979

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-07-19. a secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/handshake: hand off the pinned file reference to accept_doit

handshake_req_next() removes the request from the per-net pending list and drops hn_lock before handshake_nl_accept_doit() reads req->hr_sk->sk_socket and dereferences sock->file (once in FD_PREPARE() and again in get_file()). In that window a consumer running tls_handshake_cancel() followed by sockfd_put() (svc_sock_free) or __fput_sync() (xs_reset_transport) releases sock->file. sock_release() then runs sock_orphan(), zeroing sk_socket, and frees the struct socket. The accept-side code either reads NULL through sk_socket or chases freed memory.

The submit-side sock_hold() does not prevent this. sk_refcnt protects struct sock, but struct socket and sock->file are independently refcounted via the file descriptor the consumer owns. Pinning sk leaves sock and sock->file unprotected.

Retarget the accept-side dereferences at req->hr_file, which was pinned at submit time, instead of req->hr_sk->sk_socket->file. Pinning on its own is not sufficient: a consumer that cancels between handshake_req_next() returning and accept_doit reaching FD_PREPARE() takes the !remove_pending() branch in handshake_req_cancel() and drops hr_file before the accept side takes its own reference. Hand off an additional file reference inside handshake_req_next(), under hn_lock, so the accept side operates on a reference that no concurrent handshake_req_cancel() can revoke. FD_PREPARE() consumes that handed-off reference, either by transferring it to the new fd in fd_publish() or by dropping it in the cleanup destructor on error; the explicit get_file() that previously balanced FD_PREPARE() is therefore redundant and goes away.

Update handshake_req_cancel_test2 and _test3 to simulate the FD_PREPARE() consumption with an fput() so the kunit file-count assertions stay balanced.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8(medium)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity98% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
47%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 9, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Sep 6, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

net/handshake: hand off the pinned file reference to accept_doit - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f4251190e58b209999c1ba9e6d2976136a1be055
generic

net/handshake: hand off the pinned file reference to accept_doit - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c06876d4fac38f35820946ee3b1be7d7da799cd4
generic

net/handshake: hand off the pinned file reference to accept_doit - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/68eba6519cbd6359fb554a9720f3a3b6b2eba23f

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-63979(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(6)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (174 versions)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (141 versions)7.0.12-1

All Vendor Advisories

(6)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 28× in last 7d / 237× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 475 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-11 19:38 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-11 19:38 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-09-11 19:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-08 03:30 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-08 03:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-07 23:22 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-07 23:22 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-09-07 23:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-06 17:05 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-06 17:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-06 12:58 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-09-06 12:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-06 04:34 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-09-06 04:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-06 00:29 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-06 00:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-05 20:05 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-05 20:05 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-05 20:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-05 10:00 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-05 10:00 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-09-05 10:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-31 03:55 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-31 03:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-30 23:49 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-30 23:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-30 19:44 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-30 19:44 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-30 19:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-30 15:38 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-30 15:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-30 11:08 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-30 11:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-30 06:58 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-08-30 06:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-30 02:53 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-30 02:53 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-30 02:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-28 01:43 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-28 01:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-27 21:23 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-08-27 21:23 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-08-27 21:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-08-27 11:52 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-08-27 11:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-08-27 02:31 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-08-27 02:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-08-26 22:25 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-08-26 22:25 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-08-26 22:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-08-26 11:42 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-26 11:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-26 04:58 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-26 04:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-08-26 00:51 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-08-26 00:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-08-25 20:19 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-25 20:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-25 15:42 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-08-25 15:42 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-25 15:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-08-25 11:30 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-25 11:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-25 07:25 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-25 07:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-08-25 03:19 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-25 03:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-08-24 23:14 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-24 23:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-24 19:09 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-08-24 19:09 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-24 19:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-24 12:15 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-08-24 12:15 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-08-24 12:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-08-24 07:50 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-24 07:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-08-24 03:44 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-24 03:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-23 22:15 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-23 22:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-08-23 18:02 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-23 18:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-08-23 13:57 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-63979?
CVE-2026-63979 is a critical vulnerability published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/handshake: hand off the pinned file reference to accept_doit handshakereqnext() removes the request from the per-net pending list and drops hnlock before handshakenlacceptdoit() reads req->hrsk->sksocket and dereferences…
When was CVE-2026-63979 disclosed?
CVE-2026-63979 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 19, 2026, with the most recent update on August 9, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-63979 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-63979 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 52.5% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63979?
CVE-2026-63979 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63979?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-63979, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-63979

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63979?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.