CVE-2026-63944

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-19. the CNA's CVSS baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

Bluetooth: hci_sync: fix UAF in hci_le_create_cis_sync

hci_le_create_cis_sync() dereferences conn->conn_timeout after releasing both rcu_read_lock() and hci_dev_lock(hdev). The conn pointer was obtained from an RCU-protected iteration over hdev->conn_hash.list and is not valid once these locks are dropped. A concurrent disconnect can free the hci_conn between the unlock and the dereference, causing a use-after-free read.

The cancellation mechanism in hci_conn_del() cannot prevent this because hci_le_create_cis_pending() queues hci_create_cis_sync with data=NULL:

hci_cmd_sync_queue(hdev, hci_create_cis_sync, NULL, NULL);

While hci_conn_del() dequeues with data=conn:

hci_cmd_sync_dequeue(hdev, NULL, conn, NULL);

Since NULL != conn, the lookup in _hci_cmd_sync_lookup_entry() never matches, and the pending work item is not cancelled.

Fix this by saving conn->conn_timeout into a local variable while the locks are still held, so the stale conn pointer is never dereferenced after unlock.

This is the same class of bug as the one fixed by commit 035c25007c9e ("Bluetooth: hci_sync: Fix UAF on le_read_features_complete") which addressed the identical pattern in a different function.

This vulnerability was identified using 0sec.ai, an open-source automated security auditing platform (https://github.com/0sec-labs).

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8(medium)
EG Risk
44(Track)
EG Risk 44/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity88% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
25%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Jul 20, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

Bluetooth: hci_sync: fix UAF in hci_le_create_cis_sync - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d9019210c8c30d40eb20094274cc647e352f48f7
generic

Bluetooth: hci_sync: fix UAF in hci_le_create_cis_sync - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bfea6091e0fffb270c20e74384b660910277eb6c
generic

Bluetooth: hci_sync: fix UAF in hci_le_create_cis_sync - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a921957d39290143629eb38c4f74b9bef8035d0a
generic

Bluetooth: hci_sync: fix UAF in hci_le_create_cis_sync - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a55618c0f4cead9e59c63f5ee030d393fd70d861
generic

Bluetooth: hci_sync: fix UAF in hci_le_create_cis_sync - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/380e67b1794a9a281a0cb592b4e62077fbd0c8ca

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-63944(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(5)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)6.12.94-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (138 versions)7.0.12-1

All Vendor Advisories

(5)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 33× in last 7d / 176× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 228 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-30 02:55 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 02:55 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-30 02:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-27 22:46 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-27 22:46 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-27 22:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-27 11:53 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-27 11:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-26 22:25 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-26 22:25 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-26 22:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-26 07:55 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-26 07:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-25 20:57 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-25 20:57 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-25 20:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-25 10:04 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-25 10:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-24 23:10 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-24 23:10 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-24 23:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-24 12:17 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-24 12:17 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-24 12:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-24 01:24 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-24 01:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-23 14:29 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-23 14:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-23 03:36 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-23 03:36 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-23 03:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-22 16:42 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-22 16:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-22 05:38 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-22 05:38 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-22 05:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-21 18:44 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-21 18:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-21 07:49 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-21 07:49 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-21 07:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-20 20:56 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-08-20 20:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-08-20 10:02 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-20 10:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-19 23:09 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-08-19 23:09 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-08-19 23:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-08-19 07:18 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-08-19 07:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-08-18 20:22 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-08-18 20:22 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-18 20:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-08-18 09:24 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-18 09:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-17 21:10 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-08-17 21:10 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-08-17 21:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-08-17 08:31 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-08-17 08:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-08-16 21:38 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-08-16 21:38 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-08-16 21:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-08-16 10:45 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-16 10:45 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-16 10:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-15 23:52 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-08-15 23:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-08-15 12:59 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-15 12:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-15 02:05 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-15 02:05 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-15 02:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-08-14 15:12 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-14 15:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-14 04:19 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-08-14 04:19 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-08-14 04:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-08-13 17:25 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-08-13 17:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-08-13 06:32 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-13 06:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-08-12 19:38 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-08-12 19:38 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-12 19:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-63944?
CVE-2026-63944 is a high vulnerability published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: hcisync: fix UAF in hcilecreatecis_sync hcilecreatecissync() dereferences conn->conn_timeout after releasing both rcureadlock() and hcidevlock(hdev). The conn pointer was obtained from an RCU-protected iteration over…
When was CVE-2026-63944 disclosed?
CVE-2026-63944 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 19, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-63944 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-63944 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 75.2% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63944?
CVE-2026-63944 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 8.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63944?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-63944, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-63944

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63944?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.