CVE-2026-63886

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-07-19. the CNA's CVSS baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
Trending — Patch released this week
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

scsi: target: iscsi: Validate CHAP_R length before base64 decode

chap_server_compute_hash() allocates client_digest as kzalloc(chap->digest_size) and then, for BASE64-encoded responses, passes chap_r directly to chap_base64_decode() without checking whether the input length could produce more than digest_size bytes of output.

chap_base64_decode() writes to the destination unconditionally as long as there is input to consume. With MAX_RESPONSE_LENGTH set to 128 and the "0b" prefix stripped by extract_param(), up to 127 base64 characters can reach the decoder. 127 characters decode to 95 bytes. For SHA-256 (digest_size=32) this overflows client_digest by 63 bytes; for MD5 (digest_size=16) the overflow is 79 bytes.

The length check at line 344 fires after the write has already happened.

The HEX branch in the same switch statement already validates the length up front. Apply the same approach to the BASE64 branch: strip trailing base64 padding characters, then reject any input whose data length exceeds DIV_ROUND_UP(digest_size * 4, 3) before calling the decoder.

Stripping trailing '=' before the comparison handles both padded and unpadded encodings. chap_base64_decode() already returns early on '=', so the full original string is still passed to the decoder unchanged.

The mutual CHAP path decodes CHAP_C into initiatorchg_binhex, which is kzalloc(CHAP_CHALLENGE_STR_LEN). extract_param() caps initiatorchg at CHAP_CHALLENGE_STR_LEN characters, so at most CHAP_CHALLENGE_STR_LEN-1 base64 characters reach the decoder. The maximum decoded size, DIV_ROUND_UP((CHAP_CHALLENGE_STR_LEN-1) * 3, 4), is less than CHAP_CHALLENGE_STR_LEN, so no overflow is possible there. A comment is added at the call site to document this.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8(medium)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity98% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
51%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Aug 26, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

scsi: target: iscsi: Validate CHAP_R length before base64 decode - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/85db7391310b1304d2dc8ae3b0b12105a9567147
generic

scsi: target: iscsi: Validate CHAP_R length before base64 decode - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c04e85799356120209b351a148ac2db888d5ffd9
generic

scsi: target: iscsi: Validate CHAP_R length before base64 decode - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4a3a19c98a8207ad08bec554703d90f2c34a8cc6
generic

scsi: target: iscsi: Validate CHAP_R length before base64 decode - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bf154c657828ed05399bca5d98cf1611bb048b12
generic

scsi: target: iscsi: Validate CHAP_R length before base64 decode - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/edd06675a02376ea8347dba7c29ad982ba5b36ee
generic

scsi: target: iscsi: Validate CHAP_R length before base64 decode - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/82454e6f21e56ea9a0a9de7d0ff7e1dfb83e34d6

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-63886(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(8)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)6.1.176-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)6.12.94-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (138 versions)7.0.12-1

All Vendor Advisories

(8)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 63× in last 7d / 366× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 437 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-30 06:57 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-08-30 06:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-30 02:58 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-30 02:58 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-30 02:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-28 01:44 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-28 01:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-27 21:24 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-27 21:24 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-27 21:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-27 11:55 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-27 11:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-27 02:25 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-27 02:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-26 22:27 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-26 22:27 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-26 22:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-26 12:57 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-26 12:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-26 08:59 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-26 08:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-26 04:58 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-08-26 04:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-26 00:52 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-26 00:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-25 20:20 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-25 20:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-25 15:42 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-25 15:42 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-25 15:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-25 11:06 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-25 11:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-25 07:07 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-25 07:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-25 03:08 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-25 03:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-24 23:08 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-24 23:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-24 19:10 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-24 19:10 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-08-24 19:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-24 12:15 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-24 12:15 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-24 12:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-24 07:49 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-08-24 07:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-08-24 03:44 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-24 03:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-23 23:27 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-08-23 23:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-08-23 19:28 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-23 19:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-23 15:29 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-08-23 15:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-08-23 11:30 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-08-23 11:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-08-23 07:31 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-23 07:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-23 03:32 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-08-23 03:32 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-23 03:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-08-22 23:33 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-22 23:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-08-22 19:34 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-08-22 19:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-08-22 15:35 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-22 15:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-22 11:36 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-22 11:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-08-22 07:37 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-08-22 07:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-08-22 03:38 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-08-22 03:38 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-08-22 03:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-08-21 23:39 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-21 23:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-08-21 19:40 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-21 19:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-21 15:42 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-08-21 15:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-08-21 11:44 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-21 11:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-08-21 07:31 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-08-21 07:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-08-21 03:32 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-21 03:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-08-20 23:34 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-08-20 23:34 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-20 23:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-08-20 19:35 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-20 19:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-08-20 15:36 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-63886?
CVE-2026-63886 is a critical vulnerability published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: target: iscsi: Validate CHAP_R length before base64 decode chapservercomputehash() allocates clientdigest as kzalloc(chap->digest_size) and then, for BASE64-encoded responses, passes chapr directly to chapbase64_decode()…
When was CVE-2026-63886 disclosed?
CVE-2026-63886 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 19, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-63886 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-63886 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 49.3% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63886?
CVE-2026-63886 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 9.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63886?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-63886, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-63886

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63886?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.