In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: ISO: Fix data-race on iso_pi fields in hci_get_route calls
iso_connect_bis(), iso_connect_cis(), iso_listen_bis(), and
iso_conn_big_sync() call hci_get_route() using iso_pi(sk)->dst,
iso_pi(sk)->src, and iso_pi(sk)->src_type without holding lock_sock().
These fields may be modified concurrently by connect() or setsockopt()
on the same socket, resulting in data-races reported by KCSAN.
Fix this by snapshotting the required fields under lock_sock() before
calling hci_get_route().
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in memcmp+0x45/0xb0
race at unknown origin, with read to 0xffff8880122135cf of 1 bytes
by task 333 on cpu 1:
memcmp+0x45/0xb0
hci_get_route+0x27e/0x490
iso_connect_cis+0x4c/0xa10
iso_sock_connect+0x60e/0xb30
__sys_connect_file+0xbd/0xe0
__sys_connect+0xe0/0x110
__x64_sys_connect+0x40/0x50
x64_sys_call+0xcad/0x1c60
do_syscall_64+0x133/0x590
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
- EG Severity
- Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-29). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the BOD 26-04 block below.
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it