CVE-2026-63827

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-19. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

apparmor: fix use-after-free in rawdata dedup loop

aa_replace_profiles() walks ns->rawdata_list to dedup the incoming policy blob against entries already attached to existing profiles. Per the kernel-doc on struct aa_loaddata, list membership does not hold a reference: profiles hold pcount, and when the last pcount drops, do_ploaddata_rmfs() is queued on a workqueue that takes ns->lock and removes the entry. Between dropping the last pcount and the workqueue running, an entry remains on the list with pcount == 0.

aa_get_profile_loaddata() is an unconditional kref_get() on pcount, so when the dedup loop hits such an entry, refcount hardening reports

refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.

inside aa_replace_profiles(), and the poisoned counter then trips "saturated" and "underflow" warnings on the subsequent uses of the same loaddata.

Before commit a0b7091c4de4 ("apparmor: fix race on rawdata dereference") the dedup path used a get_unless_zero-style helper on a single counter, so the existing "if (tmp)" guard was meaningful. The split-refcount refactor introduced aa_get_profile_loaddata(), which has plain kref_get() semantics, and the guard quietly became a no-op.

Introduce aa_get_profile_loaddata_not0(), matching the existing _not0 convention used by aa_get_profile_not0(), and use it for the rawdata_list dedup lookup so dying entries are skipped.

Reproduced on x86_64 with v7.1-rc5 in QEMU+KVM running Ubuntu 24.04 + stress-ng 0.17.06:

stress-ng --apparmor 1 --klog-check --timeout 60s

Without this patch the three refcount_t warnings fire within a few seconds. With it the same 60 s run is clean. Coverage is a smoke-test only; a longer soak with CONFIG_KASAN, CONFIG_KCSAN and CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING would be welcome from anyone with the cycles.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Jul 21, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

apparmor: fix use-after-free in rawdata dedup loop - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ce261a20b41db522e320a41bbf1292bf85af66df
generic

apparmor: fix use-after-free in rawdata dedup loop - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c3ca2631073b2cef06824fd2bfc452ff7a1023de
generic

apparmor: fix use-after-free in rawdata dedup loop - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a7a2890028f16e5b0af0bb005d80fcb32559cca3
generic

apparmor: fix use-after-free in rawdata dedup loop - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6f060496d03e4dc560a40f73770bd08335cb7a27
generic

apparmor: fix use-after-free in rawdata dedup loop - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5e34fa9f6f7cd688ae153fff13139a5cf2d42339
generic

apparmor: fix use-after-free in rawdata dedup loop - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/15fd83a1e42ede15070968806bb6c8b1a5170688

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-63827(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-26.04-edge (7.0.0-31.31) @ resolute2026-09-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-7.0 (7.0.0-1013.13) @ resolute2026-09-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-09-11ubuntu

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (55 versions)5.10.262-1
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.176-1~deb11u1 (21 versions)6.1.177-1~deb11u1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (54 versions)6.1.177-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.95-1~bpo12+1 (29 versions)6.12.95-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (156 versions)7.1.3-1

Additional Vendor Advisories

(3)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 17× in last 7d / 113× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 373 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-11 20:32 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-11 20:32 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-09-11 20:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-07 23:44 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-07 23:44 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-09-07 23:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-06 13:15 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-09-06 13:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-05 20:14 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-05 20:14 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-09-05 20:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-31 02:46 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-31 02:46 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-31 02:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-30 15:43 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-30 15:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-30 03:03 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-30 03:03 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-30 03:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-27 23:00 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-27 23:00 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-27 23:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-27 11:58 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-27 11:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-26 22:47 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-26 22:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-26 11:44 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-26 11:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-25 23:48 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-25 23:48 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-25 23:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-25 12:47 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-25 12:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-25 01:45 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-25 01:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-24 14:45 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-08-24 14:45 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-08-24 14:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-08-24 03:44 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-24 03:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-23 15:22 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-08-23 15:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-08-23 04:22 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-08-23 04:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-22 17:21 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-08-22 17:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-08-22 06:20 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-08-22 06:20 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-22 06:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-21 19:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-21 08:17 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-08-21 08:17 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-08-21 08:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-08-20 21:16 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-08-20 21:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-08-20 10:15 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-20 10:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-19 23:14 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-08-19 23:14 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-19 23:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-08-19 06:51 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-19 06:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-18 19:51 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-08-18 19:51 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-18 19:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-08-18 03:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-08-17 16:41 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-08-17 16:41 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-08-17 16:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-08-17 05:23 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-17 05:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-08-17 01:17 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-08-17 01:17 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-17 01:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-08-16 14:16 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-16 14:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-08-16 03:15 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-08-16 03:15 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-16 03:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-08-15 16:14 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-63827?
CVE-2026-63827 is a high vulnerability published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: apparmor: fix use-after-free in rawdata dedup loop aareplaceprofiles() walks ns->rawdata_list to dedup the incoming policy blob against entries already attached to existing profiles. Per the kernel-doc on struct aa_loaddata, list…
When was CVE-2026-63827 disclosed?
CVE-2026-63827 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 19, 2026, with the most recent update on August 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-63827 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-63827 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.6% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63827?
CVE-2026-63827 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63827?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-63827, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-63827

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63827?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.