CVE-2026-63813

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-19. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-45479 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-q48g-gvv8-2599 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

Revert "f2fs: remove non-uptodate folio from the page cache in move_data_block"

This reverts commit 9609dd704725a40cd63d915f2ab6c44248a44598.

The kernel panics are keeping to be reported especially when the f2fs partition get almost full. By investigation, we find that the reason is one f2fs page got freed to buddy without being deleted from LRU and the root cause is the race happened in [2] which is enrolled by this commit.

There are 3 race processes in this scenario, please find below for their main activities.

The changed code in move_data_block() lets the GC path evict the tail-end folio from the page cache through folio_end_dropbehind(). Once folio_unmap_invalidate() removes the folio from mapping->i_pages, the page-cache references for all pages in the folio are dropped. The folio is then kept alive only by temporary external references, which allows a later split to operate on a folio whose subpages are no longer protected by page-cache references.

After the page-cache references are gone, split_folio_to_order() can split the big folio into individual pages and put the resulting subpages back on the LRU. For tail pages beyond EOF, split removes them from the page cache and drops their page-cache references. A tail page can then remain on the LRU with PG_lru set while holding only the split caller's temporary reference. When free_folio_and_swap_cache() drops that final reference, the page enters the final folio_put() release path.

In parallel, folio_isolate_lru() can observe the same tail page with a non-zero refcount and PG_lru set. It clears PG_lru before taking its own reference. If this races with the final folio_put() from the split path, __folio_put() sees PG_lru already cleared and skips lruvec_del_folio(). The page is then freed back to the allocator while its lru links are still present in the LRU list. A later LRU operation on a neighboring page detects the stale link and reports list corruption.

[1] [ 22.486082] list_del corruption. next->prev should be fffffffec10e0ac8, but was dead000000000122. (next=fffffffec10e0a88) [ 22.486130] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 22.486134] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:67! [ 22.486141] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP [ 22.488502] Tainted: [W]=WARN, [O]=OOT_MODULE [ 22.488506] Hardware name: Spreadtrum UMS9230 1H10 SoC (DT) [ 22.488511] pstate: 604000c5 (nZCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 22.488517] pc : __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x14c/0x154 [ 22.488531] lr : __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x14c/0x154 [ 22.488539] sp : ffffffc08006b830 [ 22.488542] x29: ffffffc08006b868 x28: 0000000000003020 x27: 0000000000000000 [ 22.488553] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000004 x24: fffffffec10e0ac0 [ 22.488564] x23: 00000000000000e8 x22: 0000000000000024 x21: dead000000000122 [ 22.488574] x20: fffffffec10e0a88 x19: fffffffec10e0ac8 x18: ffffffc080061060 [ 22.488585] x17: 20747562202c3863 x16: 6130653031636566 x15: 0000000000000058 [ 22.488595] x14: 0000000000000004 x13: ffffff80f91e0000 x12: 0000000000000003 [ 22.488605] x11: 0000000000000003 x10: 0000000000000001 x9 : ffe85721f0e25f00 [ 22.488615] x8 : ffe85721f0e25f00 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 6c65645f7473696c [ 22.488625] x5 : ffffffed39b23026 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000010 [ 22.488636] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 000000000000006d [ 22.488647] Call trace: [ 22.488651] __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x14c/0x154 (P) [ 22.488661] __folio_put+0x2bc/0x434 [ 22.488670] folio_put+0x28/0x58 [ 22.488678] do_garbage_collect+0x1a34/0x2584 [ 22.488689] f2fs_gc+0x230/0x9b4 [ 22.488697] f2fs_fallocate+0xb90/0xdf4 [ 22.488706] vfs_fallocate+0x1b4/0x2bc [ 22.488716] __arm64_sys_fallocate+0x44/0x78 [ 22.488725] invoke_syscall+0x58/0xe4 [ 22.488732] do_el0_svc+0x48/0xdc [ 22.488739] el0 ---truncated---

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
35
EG Risk 35/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
6th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-27). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Jul 21, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

Revert "f2fs: remove non-uptodate folio from the page cache in move_data_block" - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ccaba785821970f422c47770331c7e3271763f17
Web page

Revert "f2fs: remove non-uptodate folio from the page cache in move_data_block" - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6e035dae44154af4dd7bdb8ef7a1118c0b5f17b6
Web page

Revert "f2fs: remove non-uptodate folio from the page cache in move_data_block" - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1991d49433e90b2202de2fe90be3c24161873d7c

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-63813(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(11)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (157 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.3-1: fixed in 7.1.3-1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(11)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 47× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 249 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 149 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  2. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  3. 2026-10-28 05:57 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-28 05:57 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-28 05:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q48g-gvv8-2599 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  6. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  7. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  8. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  9. 2026-10-25 14:13 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  12. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  14. 2026-10-20 18:44 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-20 18:44 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-20 18:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q48g-gvv8-2599 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  17. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  18. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  19. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 03:23 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  23. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  24. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  25. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-13 11:53 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-13 11:53 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-13 11:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q48g-gvv8-2599 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  4. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  5. 2026-10-12 15:48 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 16:48 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 14:09 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  12. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  13. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  14. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  15. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  16. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  17. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  18. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  19. 2026-10-01 09:10 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-01 09:10 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-01 09:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q48g-gvv8-2599 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  22. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  23. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  24. 2026-09-28 07:41 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-28 07:41 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-09-28 07:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q48g-gvv8-2599 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  27. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  28. 2026-09-24 04:18 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-24 04:18 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-09-24 04:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q48g-gvv8-2599 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  31. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  32. 2026-09-23 02:14 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-09-23 02:14 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-09-23 02:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q48g-gvv8-2599 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  35. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  36. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  37. 2026-09-18 04:27 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-18 04:27 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-09-18 04:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q48g-gvv8-2599 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  40. 2026-09-17 10:06 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-17 10:06 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-09-17 10:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q48g-gvv8-2599 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  43. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  44. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  45. 2026-09-14 04:48 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-14 04:48 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-09-14 04:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q48g-gvv8-2599 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  48. 2026-09-13 16:21 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-13 16:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q48g-gvv8-2599 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  50. 2026-09-13 03:55 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-13 03:55 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-09-13 03:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q48g-gvv8-2599 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  53. 2026-09-12 10:25 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-09-12 10:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q48g-gvv8-2599 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  55. 2026-09-11 20:32 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-09-11 20:32 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-09-11 20:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q48g-gvv8-2599 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  58. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  59. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  60. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  61. 2026-09-07 23:44 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-09-07 23:44 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-09-07 23:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q48g-gvv8-2599 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  64. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  65. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  66. 2026-09-06 13:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q48g-gvv8-2599 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  67. 2026-09-05 20:15 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-09-05 20:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q48g-gvv8-2599 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  69. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  70. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  71. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  72. 2026-08-31 04:21 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-08-31 04:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q48g-gvv8-2599 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  74. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  75. 2026-08-30 15:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q48g-gvv8-2599 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-63813?
CVE-2026-63813 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Revert "f2fs: remove non-uptodate folio from the page cache in movedatablock" This reverts commit 9609dd704725a40cd63d915f2ab6c44248a44598. The kernel panics are keeping to be reported especially when the f2fs partition get almost…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-63813 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-63813 was published on July 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-63813 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-63813 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (6th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63813?
CVE-2026-63813 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63813?
A fix for CVE-2026-63813 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-63813 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-63813

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63813?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.