CVE-2026-63806

HIGHPre-NVD 7.17.1—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-19. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
7.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: Replace guest-triggerable BUG_ON() in ioeventfd datamatch with get_unaligned()

Drop a BUG_ON() that has been reachable since it was first added, way back in 2009, and instead use get_unaligned() to perform potentially-unaligned accesses.

For a given store, KVM x86's emulator tracks the entire value in the destination operand, x86_emulate_ctxt.dst. If the destination is memory, and the target splits multiple pages and/or is emulated MMIO, then KVM handles each fragment independently. E.g. on a page split starting at page offset 0xffc, KVM writes 4 bytes to the first page, then the remaining bytes to the second page, using ctxt->dst as the source for both (with appropriate offsets).

If the destination splits a page *and* hits emulated MMIO on the second page, then KVM will complete the write to the first page, then emulate the MMIO access to the second page. If there is a datamatch-enabled ioeventfd at offset 0 of the second page, then KVM will process the remainder of the store as a potential ioeventfd signal.

Putting it all together, if the guest emits a store that splits a page starting at page offset N, and the second page has a datamatch-enabled ioeventfd at offset 0, then KVM will check for datamatch using &dst.valptr[N] as the source. Due to dst (and thus dst.valptr) being 32-byte aligned, if N is not aligned to @len, the BUG_ON() fires.

E.g. with a 16-byte store at page offset 0xffc, to an ioeventfd of len 8, all initial checks in ioeventfd_in_range() will succeed, and the BUG_ON() fires due to @val being 4-byte aligned, but not 8-byte aligned.

------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/eventfd.c:783! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 615 Comm: repro Not tainted 7.1.0-rc2-ff238429d1ea #365 PREEMPT Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:ioeventfd_write+0x6c/0x70 [kvm] Call Trace: __kvm_io_bus_write+0x85/0xb0 [kvm] kvm_io_bus_write+0x53/0x80 [kvm] vcpu_mmio_write+0x66/0xf0 [kvm] emulator_read_write_onepage+0x12a/0x540 [kvm] emulator_read_write+0x109/0x2b0 [kvm] x86_emulate_insn+0x4f8/0xfb0 [kvm] x86_emulate_instruction+0x181/0x790 [kvm] kvm_mmu_page_fault+0x313/0x630 [kvm] vmx_handle_exit+0x18a/0x590 [kvm_intel] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xc81/0x1c90 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x2d5/0x970 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0xb7/0x890 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7f19c931a9bf Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm irqbypass ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

In a perfect world, the fix would be to simply delete the BUG_ON(), as KVM x86 doesn't perform alignment checks on "normal" memory accesses at CPL0. Sadly, C99 ruins all the fun; while the x86 architecture plays nice, dereferencing an unaligned pointer directly is undefined behavior in C, e.g. triggers splats when running with CONFIG_UBSAN_ALIGNMENT=y.

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
37
EG Risk 37/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity71% × 45%
The EG Score, 7.1 of 10.
Exploitation0% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability30% × 15%
EchelonGraph's default: CISA has not published Automatable for this CVE.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
4th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Jul 21, 2026
Patch available.
generic

KVM: Replace guest-triggerable BUG_ON() in ioeventfd datamatch with get_unaligned() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f1edbed787ba67988ed34e0132ca128b052b6ce8
generic

KVM: Replace guest-triggerable BUG_ON() in ioeventfd datamatch with get_unaligned() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bf89e3738480d33cd515b4a18900e8443d40cd2e
generic

KVM: Replace guest-triggerable BUG_ON() in ioeventfd datamatch with get_unaligned() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5da9b1a87ec7cc3489c27016313524769f12d9e0
generic

KVM: Replace guest-triggerable BUG_ON() in ioeventfd datamatch with get_unaligned() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5c87b47374682f69686068ad0a7779365a527b1c

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-63806(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(11)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (55 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.262-1: fixed in 5.10.262-1
—
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.177-1~deb11u1 (22 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.180-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.180-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (55 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.180-1: fixed in 6.1.180-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.95-1~bpo12+1 (29 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.95-1: fixed in 6.12.95-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (157 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.3-1: fixed in 7.1.3-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(11)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 50× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 247 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 147 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  2. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  3. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  4. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  5. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  6. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  7. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  8. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  9. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  10. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
  11. 2026-10-01 09:11 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-01 09:11 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-01 09:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3rc6-xmr7-v8j2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  14. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  15. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
  16. 2026-09-28 07:42 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-28 07:42 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-28 07:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3rc6-xmr7-v8j2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  19. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
  20. 2026-09-24 04:18 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-24 04:18 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-09-24 04:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3rc6-xmr7-v8j2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  23. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  24. 2026-09-23 02:16 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-23 02:16 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-23 02:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3rc6-xmr7-v8j2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  2. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  3. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  4. 2026-09-18 04:27 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-18 04:27 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-09-18 04:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3rc6-xmr7-v8j2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  7. 2026-09-17 10:06 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-17 10:06 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-09-17 10:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3rc6-xmr7-v8j2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  10. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  11. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  12. 2026-09-14 04:50 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-14 04:50 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-09-14 04:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3rc6-xmr7-v8j2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  15. 2026-09-13 16:23 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-09-13 16:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3rc6-xmr7-v8j2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  17. 2026-09-13 03:56 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-13 03:56 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-09-13 03:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3rc6-xmr7-v8j2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  20. 2026-09-12 10:25 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-12 10:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3rc6-xmr7-v8j2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  22. 2026-09-11 20:33 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-11 20:33 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-11 20:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3rc6-xmr7-v8j2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  25. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  26. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  27. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  28. 2026-09-07 23:45 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-07 23:45 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-09-07 23:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3rc6-xmr7-v8j2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  31. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  32. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  33. 2026-09-06 13:16 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-09-06 13:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3rc6-xmr7-v8j2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  35. 2026-09-05 20:16 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-05 20:16 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-09-05 20:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3rc6-xmr7-v8j2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  38. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  39. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  40. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  41. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  42. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  43. 2026-08-31 04:26 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-31 04:26 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-31 04:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3rc6-xmr7-v8j2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  46. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  47. 2026-08-30 15:43 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-30 15:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3rc6-xmr7-v8j2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  49. 2026-08-30 03:03 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-08-30 03:03 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-30 03:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3rc6-xmr7-v8j2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  52. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  53. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  54. 2026-08-28 01:45 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-28 01:45 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-28 01:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3rc6-xmr7-v8j2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  57. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  58. 2026-08-27 11:58 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-27 11:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3rc6-xmr7-v8j2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  60. 2026-08-26 22:29 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-08-26 22:29 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-08-26 22:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3rc6-xmr7-v8j2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  63. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  64. 2026-08-26 09:00 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-26 09:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3rc6-xmr7-v8j2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  66. 2026-08-25 20:21 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-08-25 20:21 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-25 20:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3rc6-xmr7-v8j2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  69. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  70. 2026-08-25 07:38 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-25 07:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3rc6-xmr7-v8j2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  72. 2026-08-24 19:11 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-08-24 19:11 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-24 19:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3rc6-xmr7-v8j2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  75. 2026-08-24 03:44 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-63806?
CVE-2026-63806 is a high vulnerability published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: Replace guest-triggerable BUGON() in ioeventfd datamatch with getunaligned() Drop a BUG_ON() that has been reachable since it was first added, way back in 2009, and instead use get_unaligned() to perform potentially-unaligned…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-63806 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-63806 was published on July 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-63806 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-63806 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (4th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63806?
CVE-2026-63806 has a CVSS base score of 7.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63806?
A fix for CVE-2026-63806 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-63806 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-63806

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63806?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.